Re: running "apt-get update" locally

2009-11-26 Thread Nuno Magalhães
>From a q quick search: http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/237 So apt-mirror maybe. HTH. -- () ascii-rubanda kampajno - kontraŭ html-a retpoŝto /\ ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsub

Re: running "apt-get update" locally

2009-11-26 Thread Celejar
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:34:08 + Avi Greenbury wrote: > Albretch Mueller wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Jochen Schulz > > wrote: > > > From what I guess, you actually just want to: > > > > > # apt-get update > > > # apt-get -d upgrade > > > > > This stores all upgradeable pac

Re: running "apt-get update" locally

2009-11-26 Thread Avi Greenbury
Albretch Mueller wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Jochen Schulz > wrote: > > From what I guess, you actually just want to: > > > # apt-get update > > # apt-get -d upgrade > > > This stores all upgradeable package files > > in /var/cache/apt/archives, > > what about the case in which

Re: running "apt-get update" locally

2009-11-26 Thread Albretch Mueller
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Jochen Schulz wrote: > From what I guess, you actually just want to: > # apt-get update > # apt-get -d upgrade > This stores all upgradeable package files in /var/cache/apt/archives, what about the case in which you want to stash the downloaded files somewhere

Re: running "apt-get update" locally

2009-11-26 Thread Jochen Schulz
Albretch Mueller: > ~ > How do you make "apt-get update" save all files downloaded for an > update in a certain directory You don't. The 'update' operation is not designed to do that. > and then what changes do you make in > your source.list in order to get those files from your local > director