Re: runlevel

2021-10-12 Thread Felix Miata
Pierre Frenkiel composed on 2021-10-12 13:05 (UTC-0400): > I found today that my runlevel is set to 5, but I have no idea where it > comes from. > in /etc/inittab, it is set to 2, but I saw that this file is no more used. > So, can anybody tell where it is set?

Re: runlevel

2021-10-12 Thread Georgi Naplatanov
On 10/12/21 20:05, Pierre Frenkiel wrote: > hi, > I found today that my runlevel is set to 5, but I have no idea where it > comes from. > in /etc/inittab, it is set to 2, but I saw that this file is no more used. > So, can anybody tell where it is set? > In systemd. Kind regards Georgi

Re: runlevel

2021-10-12 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 07:05:31PM +0200, Pierre Frenkiel wrote: > hi, > I found today that my runlevel is set to 5, but I have no idea where it > comes from. > in /etc/inittab, it is set to 2, but I saw that this file is no more used. > So, can anybody tell where it is set? What version of Debian

Re: Runlevel for textmode

2007-05-14 Thread Celejar
On Sun, 13 May 2007 23:29:53 -0500 "Mumia W.." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 05/13/2007 10:51 AM, Tim Johnson wrote: > > On Sunday 13 May 2007 22:13, Nelson Castillo wrote: > >> On 5/13/07, Tim Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> In Debian you use runlevel 2 for everything. > >> (I'd b

Re: Runlevel for textmode

2007-05-13 Thread Mumia W..
On 05/13/2007 10:51 AM, Tim Johnson wrote: On Sunday 13 May 2007 22:13, Nelson Castillo wrote: On 5/13/07, Tim Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In Debian you use runlevel 2 for everything. (I'd better say there's no need to use another runlevel). You'll run on 2 by default whether you use

Re: Runlevel for textmode

2007-05-13 Thread Tim Johnson
On Sunday 13 May 2007 22:13, Nelson Castillo wrote: > On 5/13/07, Tim Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In Debian you use runlevel 2 for everything. > (I'd better say there's no need to use another runlevel). > You'll run on 2 by default whether you use X or not. understood. > I'd rm /etc/rc

Re: Runlevel for textmode

2007-05-13 Thread Liam O'Toole
On Sun, 13 May 2007 14:12:36 + Tim Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi ; > I want to start in textmode. > In /etc/inittab > I commented out the following line > id:2:initdefault: > as follows: > # id:2:initdefault: > and added the following: > id:3:initdefault: > but etch continues to boot

Re: Runlevel for textmode

2007-05-13 Thread Nelson Castillo
On 5/13/07, Tim Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi ; Hi. I want to start in textmode. In /etc/inittab I commented out the following line id:2:initdefault: as follows: # id:2:initdefault: and added the following: id:3:initdefault: but etch continues to boot up to an X login. What runlevel n

Re: runlevel policy

2005-09-19 Thread Ron Peterson
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 01:45:19PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote: > > "Paul E Condon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:11:55AM -0400, Ron Peterson wrote: > >>On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:40:46AM -0400, Ron Peterson wrote: > >> > >>> Can anyone exp

Re: runlevel policy

2005-09-19 Thread Joe Smith
"Paul E Condon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:11:55AM -0400, Ron Peterson wrote: On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:40:46AM -0400, Ron Peterson wrote: > Can anyone explain why Debian's runlevel policy seems to have strayed > so far from traditi

Re: runlevel policy

2005-09-19 Thread Paul E Condon
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:11:55AM -0400, Ron Peterson wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:40:46AM -0400, Ron Peterson wrote: > > > Can anyone explain why Debian's runlevel policy seems to have strayed > > so far from traditional System V? Why is xdm/gdm/kdm etc. in runlevel > > three, for exampl

Re: runlevel policy

2005-09-19 Thread Ron Peterson
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:40:46AM -0400, Ron Peterson wrote: > Can anyone explain why Debian's runlevel policy seems to have strayed > so far from traditional System V? Why is xdm/gdm/kdm etc. in runlevel > three, for example? I realize the concept of 'traditional' System V runlevel policy is d

Re: runlevel 2 vs 3 vs 5 deprecated in sarge?

2004-11-26 Thread Micha Feigin
At Fri, 26 Nov 2004 12:55:15 +, Joao Clemente wrote: > > I was testing some stuff that needed rebooting my sarge installation an > I tought to myself that it was a waste of time to startup X at every > boot > So I headed to /etc/inittab to change it to runlevel 3... but I was > amazed t

Re: runlevel 2 vs 3 vs 5 deprecated in sarge?

2004-11-26 Thread Joao Clemente
Martin Fluch wrote: On Fri, 26 Nov 2004, newbin shang wrote: On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 12:55:15 +, Joao Clemente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I was testing some stuff that needed rebooting my sarge installation an I tought to myself that it was a waste of time to startup X at every boot So I head

Re: runlevel 2 vs 3 vs 5 deprecated in sarge?

2004-11-26 Thread Marc Wilson
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 12:55:15PM +, Joao Clemente wrote: > So, do those standarts of 5 = multiuser + X, 3 = multiuser - X, ... > stoped being used in sarge? Why? They couldn't have stopped, because they had never started. The default run-level for Debian is two, and has been so since pre-P

Re: runlevel 2 vs 3 vs 5 deprecated in sarge?

2004-11-26 Thread Martin Fluch
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004, newbin shang wrote: On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 12:55:15 +, Joao Clemente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I was testing some stuff that needed rebooting my sarge installation an I tought to myself that it was a waste of time to startup X at every boot So I headed to /etc/inittab to

Re: runlevel 2 vs 3 vs 5 deprecated in sarge?

2004-11-26 Thread newbin shang
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 12:55:15 +, Joao Clemente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was testing some stuff that needed rebooting my sarge installation an > I tought to myself that it was a waste of time to startup X at every > boot > So I headed to /etc/inittab to change it to runlevel 3... but I

Re: runlevel 2 vs 3 vs 5 deprecated in sarge?

2004-11-26 Thread Frank Gevaerts
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 12:55:15PM +, Joao Clemente wrote: > I was testing some stuff that needed rebooting my sarge installation an > I tought to myself that it was a waste of time to startup X at every > boot > So I headed to /etc/inittab to change it to runlevel 3... but I was > amaze

Re: runlevel 2 vs 3 vs 5 deprecated in sarge?

2004-11-26 Thread Stephan Seitz
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 12:55:15PM +, Joao Clemente wrote: So I headed to /etc/inittab to change it to runlevel 3... but I was amazed to see that the value there was 2 So, do those standarts of 5 = multiuser + X, 3 = multiuser - X, ... stoped being used in sarge? Why? Are you sure those

Re: Runlevel links?

2001-02-09 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 08:10:22AM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote: > on Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 10:47:41AM -0500, Noah L. Meyerhans ([EMAIL > PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 07:22:47AM -0800, Tom Schuetz wrote: > > > Could someone suggest some links where I can learn the concept of

Re: Runlevel links?

2001-02-09 Thread kmself
on Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 10:47:41AM -0500, Noah L. Meyerhans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 07:22:47AM -0800, Tom Schuetz wrote: > > Could someone suggest some links where I can learn the concept of > > runlevels? I'm not seeing it in any glossaries, and I don't think I > >

Re: Runlevel links?

2001-02-09 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 07:22:47AM -0800, Tom Schuetz wrote: > Could someone suggest some links where I can learn the concept of > runlevels? I'm not seeing it in any glossaries, and I don't think I > found it in the manual. See /usr/share/doc/sysvinit. noah -- __

Re: runlevel + Serverstart at bootup

2000-10-29 Thread Timo Benk
Hi, On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Hanno Böttcher wrote: > A friend of mine told me, that serverstartups are configured with the > runleves under etc/r.. I used Suse before and there was a central file > named rc.config where you could set the server starts. Is there a > similar file in Debian? Or do I real

Re: runlevel + Serverstart at bootup

2000-10-27 Thread Juergen Fiedler
It should be noted, though, that you don't actually put the startup files in each of the folders: you create one file for each daemon or set of daemons in /etc/init.d and link to that (symbolically) from the individual folders. The name you give the links represents whether you want to start a

RE: runlevel + Serverstart at bootup

2000-10-27 Thread Todd_La_Pittus
leh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Hanno Böttcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org (Todd La Pittus/HQ/3Com) Subject: RE: runlevel + Serverstart at bootup On 27-Oct-2000 Hanno B?ttcher wrote: > Hi all! > > A friend of mine told me, that ser

RE: runlevel + Serverstart at bootup

2000-10-27 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 27-Oct-2000 Hanno Böttcher wrote: > Hi all! > > A friend of mine told me, that serverstartups are configured with the > runleves under etc/r.. I used Suse before and there was a central file > named rc.config where you could set the server starts. Is there a > similar file in Debian? Or do I r

Re: runlevel management and netbase

1999-10-19 Thread Brad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Ethan Benson wrote: > I have found and RTFM on update-rcd but it does not seem to be really > equivalent to chkconfig (only works to add a symlink not change > existing ones nor list the status of a service for a specified > runlevel...)

RE: runlevel management and netbase

1999-10-19 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 19-Oct-99 Ethan Benson wrote: > hello, > > I am switching to debian from redhat land and have come across a > couple things that I have not been able to find complete answers to: > welcome aboard (-: > I have found and RTFM on update-rcd but it does not seem to be really > equivalent to c