Re: Re: question about apt upgrade facing locally build packages

2024-11-22 Thread Tim Woodall
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024, Patrice Duroux wrote: That's why I ended up with the suffix and letting the sysadmin (often me, with a different hat on ;-) making that preference explicit in the APT machinery. But could it be the a nice feature for apt to have a list apart on the upgrading (I would say

Re: question about apt upgrade facing locally build packages

2024-11-20 Thread tomas
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 12:04:42PM +, Tim Woodall wrote: > That's what I do too. > > +~tjw12r1 > if I've patched the current version. > ~tjw12r1 if I've backported a higher version. > > I scan for newer versions in debian and auto-rebase my changes (unless > the rebase fails) so I'm rarely mo

Re: question about apt upgrade facing locally build packages

2024-11-20 Thread Tim Woodall
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 11:53:25AM -0600, David Wright wrote: On Sat 16 Nov 2024 at 15:54:17 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote: On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 03:11:37PM +0100, Patrice Duroux wrote: On Sid, building and installing locally modified packages

Re: question about apt upgrade facing locally build packages

2024-11-20 Thread Anssi Saari
Patrice Duroux writes: > But could it be the a nice feature for apt to have a list apart on the > upgrading > (I would say then 'replacing') of such cases? > User can be alerted more easily during apt upgrade that some packages with a > same version could be replaced by the Debian archive ones.

Re: Re: question about apt upgrade facing locally build packages

2024-11-17 Thread tomas
On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 08:41:24PM +0100, Patrice Duroux wrote: > > > That's why I ended up with the suffix and letting the sysadmin > > (often me, with a different hat on ;-) making that preference > > explicit in the APT machinery. > > But could it be the a nice feature for apt to have a list a

Re: Re: question about apt upgrade facing locally build packages

2024-11-16 Thread Patrice Duroux
> That's why I ended up with the suffix and letting the sysadmin > (often me, with a different hat on ;-) making that preference > explicit in the APT machinery. But could it be the a nice feature for apt to have a list apart on the upgrading (I would say then 'replacing') of such cases? User ca

Re: question about apt upgrade facing locally build packages

2024-11-16 Thread tomas
On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 11:53:25AM -0600, David Wright wrote: > On Sat 16 Nov 2024 at 15:54:17 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 03:11:37PM +0100, Patrice Duroux wrote: > > > > > > On Sid, building and installing locally modified packages for testing > > > at the same ve

Re: question about apt upgrade facing locally build packages

2024-11-16 Thread David Wright
On Sat 16 Nov 2024 at 15:54:17 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 03:11:37PM +0100, Patrice Duroux wrote: > > > > On Sid, building and installing locally modified packages for testing > > at the same version as in the archive, I am surprised that apt upgrade > > will reinst

Re: question about apt upgrade facing locally build packages

2024-11-16 Thread tomas
On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 03:11:37PM +0100, Patrice Duroux wrote: > Hi, > > On Sid, building and installing locally modified packages for testing > at the same version as in the archive, I am surprised that apt upgrade > will reinstall any of those installed by the one from the archive. I > did not