On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:12:09 +, Tixy wrote:
>> > ;; ANSWER SECTION:
>> > maroon. 0 IN A 127.0.0.1
>> >
>> > ;; Query time: 0 msec
>> > ;; SERVER: 192.168.0.100#53(192.168.0.100) ;; WHEN: Sun Feb 6
>> > 23:20:41 2011
>> > ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 40
>>
>> This is t
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 04:44 +, T o n g wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 04:27:06 +, T o n g wrote:
>
> > $ dig maroon @maroon
> >
> > ; <<>> DiG 9.7.1-P2 <<>> maroon @maroon ;; global options: +cmd
> > ;; Got answer:
> > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 53975 ;; flags: qr
>
On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 11:12:37 +, Tixy wrote:
> I also had another thought, Is kvm1 a virtual machine? If so, does it
> even get to talk directly to the dnsmasq server or is the host doing NAT
> and it's own configuration for the guest?
See my blog,
http://sfxpt.wordpress.com/2011/02/06/provi
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 10:58 +, T o n g wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 07:23:33 +, Tixy wrote:
>
> > Had kvm1 got it's ip address by DHCP at this point? Dnsmasq doesn't
> > return results for machines until after its served out an address. . .
>
> Ahh... no wonder.
> Thanks -- what a good r
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 03:15 +, T o n g wrote:
> On second though, if I dedicate a box for dnsmasq as both dhcp and dns ow
> this could be arranged.
> server, can I use a dhcp client on the very box to obtain the fixed IP
> address configured in dnsmasq?
>
> I know this is kind of chicken-egg
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 04:27 +, T o n g wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Feb 2011 20:19:43 +, Tixy wrote:
>
> > . . . adding a dhcp-host line in dnsmasq.conf for each NIC. E.g. the
> > entry for the machine I'm typing on is
> >
> > dhcp-host=00:28:58:3A:EB:A1,192.168.2.20,computer2,infinite
> >
On Sat, 05 Feb 2011 20:19:43 +, Tixy wrote:
> . . . adding a dhcp-host line in dnsmasq.conf for each NIC. E.g. the
> entry for the machine I'm typing on is
>
> dhcp-host=00:28:58:3A:EB:A1,192.168.2.20,computer2,infinite
> ^ ^^ ^ MAC
On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 04:07 +, T o n g wrote:
> In that case, I assume that the dnsmasq server need to be configured to
> be on a static IP, correct? Any I need to manually set up everything
> else, like route, etc, correct?
Yes, in /etc/network/interfaces I have:
allow-hotplug eth0
ifa
On Sat, 05 Feb 2011 20:19:43 +, Tixy wrote:
> You'll have to disable DHCP on your router so only your new box responds
> to DHCP requests. . .
Thanks for your answer, Tixy.
In that case, I assume that the dnsmasq server need to be configured to
be on a static IP, correct? Any I need to man
On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 15:34 +, T o n g wrote:
[...]
> - The dnsmasq can be used as both dhchp and dns server. This is
> ideal for a home network. My question is, my router is
> currently acting as both dhchp and dns server for the moment,
> if I dedicate a box for dnsmasq as both dhchp an
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 09:11:54PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > pump does not obey the RFC and has been known to not work on all networks.
> > Debian is moving away from it.
>
> This is no longer the case. pump is now useing AF_PACKET to send d
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> pump does not obey the RFC and has been known to not work on all networks.
> Debian is moving away from it.
This is no longer the case. pump is now useing AF_PACKET to send discover
packets.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.or
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 03:12:04PM -0600, Elizabeth Barham wrote:
>
> In /etc/init.d/networking, you'll see:
>
>
> if ! [ -x /sbin/ifup ]; then
> exit 0
> fi
>
> -x == -x FILETrue if the file is executable by you.
>
> The file must exist and whoever
Martin Wuertele posts :
> modify /etc/network/interfaces and add the auto line
This is already there in my /etc/network/interfaces file. It fails to
work. Only if I run udhcpc as root, does the eth0 device come up. How
does one bring up the eth0 interface automatically upon boot ?
--
/(__ _
"Sridhar M.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> All these are there [/etc/networking/interfaces]. But, when I give
> the command:
>
> /etc/init.d/networking start|restart
>
> nothing happens.
~~~ ~~~
In /etc/init.d/networking, you'll see:
if ! [ -x /sbin/ifup ]; then
exit 0
fi
-
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 10:23:48AM +0100, Martin Wuertele wrote:
>
> modify /etc/network/interfaces and add the auto line:
>
> eg
> auto eth0
>
> will when booting fire up eth0. and if your configuration is something
> like
> eth0 inet dhcp
> it will when booting a
Hi Raghavendra!
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
> I start udhcpc manually. What is the best way to start udhcpc while
> booting up ? Is it OK to create a symlink farm using update-rc.d ? How
> are you doing this ?
modify /etc/network/interfaces and add the auto line:
eg
auto
Adam Majer posts :
> like udhcpc since it is very small and seems to work quite reliably.
I start udhcpc manually. What is the best way to start udhcpc while
booting up ? Is it OK to create a symlink farm using update-rc.d ? How
are you doing this ?
TIA.
--
/(__ __|\ ragOO, VU2RGU<->h
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 08:26:42PM -0600, hanasaki wrote:
> What about these lines in the example config? Woudl you be kind and
> send your interfaces and dhclient.conf ?
>
> Thank you
>
> #alias {
> # interface "eth0";
> # fixed-address 192.5.5.213;
> # option subnet-mask 255.255.255.255;
>
What about these lines in the example config? Woudl you be kind and
send your interfaces and dhclient.conf ?
Thank you
#alias {
# interface "eth0";
# fixed-address 192.5.5.213;
# option subnet-mask 255.255.255.255;
#}
#lease {
# interface "eth0";
# fixed-address 192.33.137.200;
Adam M
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 10:27:24AM -0600, hanasaki wrote:
> I have both installed.
> - is there a way to tell ifup/down which to use?
> dhclient seems to need entries for each interface, that will get a
> lease, in /etc/dhclient.conf. Pump is nice in that it only requireds on
> place to sp
On 12-Mar-2002 hanasaki wrote:
> I have both installed.
> - is there a way to tell ifup/down which to use?
> dhclient seems to need entries for each interface, that will get a
> lease, in /etc/dhclient.conf. Pump is nice in that it only requireds on
> place to specifiy that the interface
[Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 02:38:46AM -0400] Shaya:
> while the parent eventually quits (when I get the IP) the child keeps
> on pumping away
Do a 'ps auwx' and see whether the parent process has become a zombie
process. Is the child process still active ? It would be better if you
switch to 'dh
I take it that is your own network? Try and have the dhcp server supply
the proper domain to your clients. That may or may not clean this up.
I'm not sure about how pump cleans and restores the resolv.conf or why
you get a zombie.
--mike
On 08 Aug 2001 20:07:47 +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> Mi
Michael Heldebrant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmmm. I have a pump.conf to not clobber my resolv.conf on address
> allocation. Just checking if you did. Perhaps this is a sleeping
> process waiting for you to let go of the address so it can restore your
> resolv.conf. I'm not sure otherwise
Hmmm. I have a pump.conf to not clobber my resolv.conf on address
allocation. Just checking if you did. Perhaps this is a sleeping
process waiting for you to let go of the address so it can restore your
resolv.conf. I'm not sure otherwise what would do that. What does the
syslog say about pump
What kernel version and what is your /etc/pump.conf look like?
--mike
> On 08 Aug 2001 18:30:14 +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> hi,
>
> i've got a strange behavior of pump here on my box. when i use it to
> configure my interaces, i get strange kernelthreads:
>
> |10562 pts/2S 0:00 pump
Once a week my ATT cablemodem lease expires. Pump has never auto-released.
I have a cronjob that runs monday at 5:00am, and thursday also. This covers
the spread incase a cable outage actually drops my line and isn't on the sunday
list for some reason.
It's not just you Carl, I hve the same p
Guy Geens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alan> Hmmm... it shouldn't happen every week, but if your IP changes,
> Alan> pump will _not_ try to get a new lease...
>
> It might be an ISP policy.
It's not. I have the same ISP. 8^) They do renumber on occasion,
so maybe Carl got unlucky
--
A
> "Alan" == Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Carl" == Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Carl> periodically (perhaps every other week) my Internet connection
Carl> via Optimum Online (Cablevision) freezes
Alan> Hmmm... it shouldn't happen every week, but if your IP changes,
A
Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> periodically (perhaps every other week) my Internet connection via
> Optimum Online (Cablevision) freezes, and I have to kill and restart
> pump in order to get everything freed up. Yes, kill, pump -R does
> not work.
Hmmm... it shouldn't happen every week
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 06:32:47AM +, Jim Breton wrote:
> In /var/log/daemon.log I see the following:
>
> cardmgr[163]: + /sbin/pump -i eth0 > /dev/null
> cardmgr[163]: + pump: no extra parameters are expected
> cardmgr[163]: start cmd exited with status 1
Well... I found the problem.
I had
Please ignore, I was unaware of the debian-laptop list until just now;
will re-post there. Thanks.
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 06:22:12AM -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 01:30:27AM -0600, Benjamin Pharr wrote:
> > I finally found the right kernel options for my ethernet card, so now the
> > kernel recognizes it, but I need to setup dhcp support to configure eth0
> > at boot time
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 01:30:27AM -0600, Benjamin Pharr wrote:
> I finally found the right kernel options for my ethernet card, so now the
> kernel recognizes it, but I need to setup dhcp support to configure eth0
> at boot time. pump is already installed, but it doesn't seem to be doing
> an
Quoting Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 05:04:41PM -0600, Bill Bell wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I have a box which is using mostly woody and I have a quesiton
> > about using pump as a DHCP client. Documentation for pump is
> > scarce, perhaps because functionali
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 05:04:41PM -0600, Bill Bell wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have a box which is using mostly woody and I have a quesiton about using
> pump
> as a DHCP client. Documentation for pump is scarce, perhaps because
> functionality is limited.
>
> How do I run a script each time p
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 11:01:39PM +0200, Esko Lehtonen wrote:
> I have a problem configuring my debian potato to use dhcp. I'm
> connected to the Internet via cable modem. The network card is
> configured to irq=10 and io=0x300. The module is smc-ultra. The card
> should be ok.
>
> When I start
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Why was pump made the default DHCP client ? I have been unable to get
> > pump working with my @Home setup. dhcp-client, however, works very
> > well.
> >
>
> dunno, apparently it was small or something. Plus if it worked for Red Hat
Ju
>
> Why was pump made the default DHCP client ? I have been unable to get
> pump working with my @Home setup. dhcp-client, however, works very
> well.
>
dunno, apparently it was small or something. Plus if it worked for Red Hat
..
> -Original Message-
> From: Bryan K. Walton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 6:23 PM
> To: Debian-User Mailing List
> Subject: pump replacing dhcpcd?
>
>
> When I go to the debian web site and look up info on the pump
> package, one of the things that the
On 13-Sep-2000 Bryan K. Walton wrote:
> When I go to the debian web site and look up info on the pump package, one of
> the things that the page tells me is:
>
> "This is the DHCP/BOOTP client written by RedHat. This replaces the dhcpcd
> package."
>
> I take this to mean that the dhcpcd client
42 matches
Mail list logo
