on Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 09:35:01AM -0600, Alex Malinovich ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Galeon should work with no problems on a Potato system. I had it running
> for a couple of weeks on my desktop before I upgraded to sid. I've run
> it on a P133 with 40 megs of RAM with no major problems. And Ga
Lo, on Sunday, February 17, will trillich did write:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 09:35:01AM -0600, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> > Galeon should work with no problems on a Potato system. I had it running
> > for a couple of weeks on my desktop before I upgraded to sid. I've run
> > it on a P133 with 40 m
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 09:35:01AM -0600, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> Galeon should work with no problems on a Potato system. I had it running
> for a couple of weeks on my desktop before I upgraded to sid. I've run
> it on a P133 with 40 megs of RAM with no major problems. And Galeon is,
> by far, th
Galeon should work with no problems on a Potato system. I had it running
for a couple of weeks on my desktop before I upgraded to sid. I've run
it on a P133 with 40 megs of RAM with no major problems. And Galeon is,
by far, the most superior browser I've had the pleasure of EVER using.
There are re
on Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 11:05:52PM -0600, will trillich ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> i know that somewhere out there someone has concocted a list of
> potato-friendly x-window-system web browsers. nice comparison
> table. relative functionality and speed. utility. bugginess.
I've reviewed browser
> > mozilla seems slow, konq i havent had much experience with,
>
> It's almost unusable here, but I attributed that to the machine -- on a
> Pentium Classic 166MHz, _everything's_ slow, even with 96MB. ;) Once I
As I said before, I'm with a Pentium 100, 32MB, Opera 6, WindowMaker, a
tweaked ke
> > Opera6 is woody-hostile?? Since when? I use O6tp3 with GNOME
> > & Sawfish, and it works really smooth.
I use Woody and WindowMaker in a Pentium 100, 32mb ram. I Tried Opera 5 and it
just segfaults when I invoke it. Opera 6 runs very fast and never crashed. I
love these mouse gestures too.
> to try it. Could you elaborate on what you mean by v6 being
> "hostile"? What sort of behavior have you observed? And were you
> able to get the Sun JRE working with it?
see my other mails in the thread, i explained the problems..
haven't tried the sun JRE..
>
> You know, I bought into Oper
On 8 Feb 2002 1:13AM, nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> so, what browsers are available as potato-friendly *.deb for X?
>
> Opera 5 and Opera 6 are potato friendly. in my experience
> opera 6 is woody-hostile though. opera 5 works good in woody.
Hmm, I didn't know Opera was available as a
> Opera6 is woody-hostile?? Since when? I use O6tp3 with GNOME
> & Sawfish, and it works really smooth.
for me, since the beginning (TP1). My laptop at home
runs woody and TP1, TP2 and now TP3 all segfault instantly
on startup, on my desktop at work which runs woody, it starts
but the "back" f
On Fri, 2002-02-08 at 06:12, nate wrote:
>
> > so, what browsers are available as potato-friendly *.deb for X?
> Opera 5 and Opera 6 are potato friendly. in my experience
> opera 6 is woody-hostile though. opera 5 works good in woody.
Opera 6 is working fine for me in woody, and I've found it to
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 22:12:51 -0800 (PST) "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
[snip]
> Opera 5 and Opera 6 are potato friendly. in my experience
> opera 6 is woody-hostile though. opera 5 works good in woody.
[big snip]
Opera6 is woody-hostile?? Since when? I use O6tp3 with GNOME
& Sawfish, and i
> i know that somewhere out there someone has concocted a list of
> potato-friendly x-window-system web browsers. nice comparison
> table. relative functionality and speed. utility. bugginess.
>
> searching at google finds wy too many not-even-close pages.
>
> so, what browsers are available a
13 matches
Mail list logo
