deloptes writes:
> fxkl47BF wrote:
>
>> no offense taken
>> i use expect_mkpasswd to generate passwords
>> decades ago i got tired of trying to come up with user names
>> i just use expect_mkpasswd to make a short unique name
>> today everyone is trying to glean all of the personal info they can
On Du, 10 oct 21, 10:31:58, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > In general, the circumstances which would require one to use a tool like
> > protonmail are not commonly observed in connection with a list like
> > debian-user.
>
> While protonmail might be used for such situations, in my experience
> most pr
On Du, 10 oct 21, 17:18:13, fxkl47BF wrote:
> just one more thing
>
> posteo was mentioned as an alternative
> i have a posteo account i will drop in a few months
> their spam policy is to bounce it back to the sender
> the account own has no say
>
> i also have a mailfence account i will drop
>
On Du, 10 oct 21, 13:41:33, fxkl47BF wrote:
>
> once again i totally agree and disagree
> gmail, yahoo, gmx, etc. state that they scan mail going through their service
They are free to scan all my postings to a publicly archived list, same
as the rest of the internet ;)
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
fxkl47BF wrote:
> no offense taken
> i use expect_mkpasswd to generate passwords
> decades ago i got tired of trying to come up with user names
> i just use expect_mkpasswd to make a short unique name
> today everyone is trying to glean all of the personal info they can
> i try not give out any mo
On Sun 10 Oct 2021 at 19:46:39 +, fxkl47BF wrote:
[Mangled quoted text deleted]
> > You have a link to a statement of this policy?
> >
> > -
> >
> > Brian.
>
> i do not
> only a personal email from supp...@posteo.de
I tend to take such mails f
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, October 10th, 2021 at 1:46 PM, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 10 Oct 2021 at 17:18:13 +, fxkl47BF wrote:
>
> > just one more thing
> >
> > posteo was mentioned as an alternative
> >
> > i have a posteo account i will drop in a few months
> >
> > their spam
On Sun 10 Oct 2021 at 17:18:13 +, fxkl47BF wrote:
> just one more thing
>
> posteo was mentioned as an alternative
> i have a posteo account i will drop in a few months
> their spam policy is to bounce it back to the sender
> the account own has no say
You have a link to a statement of this
> In general, the circumstances which would require one to use a tool like
> protonmail are not commonly observed in connection with a list like
> debian-user.
While protonmail might be used for such situations, in my experience
most protonmail users I've seen are just people that are sufficiently
just one more thing
posteo was mentioned as an alternative
i have a posteo account i will drop in a few months
their spam policy is to bounce it back to the sender
the account own has no say
i also have a mailfence account i will drop
a while back i stopped getting mail from my bank
i investigate
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, October 10th, 2021 at 9:31 AM, Stefan Monnier
wrote:
> > In general, the circumstances which would require one to use a tool like
> >
> > protonmail are not commonly observed in connection with a list like
> >
> > debian-user.
>
> While protonmail mig
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, October 10th, 2021 at 9:30 AM, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 01:44:50PM +, fxkl47BF wrote:
>
> > but on another mailing list i used this same address
> >
> > i was banned
> >
> > the admin apologized and explained later my add
Hi.
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 01:44:50PM +, fxkl47BF wrote:
> but on another mailing list i used this same address
> i was banned
> the admin apologized and explained later my address looked suspicious
Here they do not ban users based on e-mail domain alone.
You have to do something wor
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, October 10th, 2021 at 8:23 AM, Greg Wooledge
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 09:32:55AM +, fxkl47BF wrote:
>
> > in a different mailing list it was implied that if a person uses protonmail
> > they must be up to no good
> >
> > i've used protonm
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, October 10th, 2021 at 8:16 AM, Roberto C. Sánchez
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 01:09:03PM +, fxkl47BF wrote:
>
> > i understand and respect what you are saying
> >
> > i also reject it
> >
> > we have no way of knowing you are roberto
> >
> >
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 09:32:55AM +, fxkl47BF wrote:
>
> in a different mailing list it was implied that if a person uses protonmail
> they must be up to no good
> i've used protonmail for about 6 months now and been satisfied
> what am i missing
I suspect I know which mailing list you're t
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 01:09:03PM +, fxkl47BF wrote:
>
> i understand and respect what you are saying
> i also reject it
> we have no way of knowing you are roberto
> following what you say it would make people feel warm and fuzzy if i called
> myself george washinton
> it's just judging a b
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, October 10th, 2021 at 7:17 AM, Roberto C. Sánchez
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 09:32:55AM +, fxkl47BF wrote:
>
> > in a different mailing list it was implied that if a person uses protonmail
> > they must be up to no good
> >
> > i've used pr
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 09:32:55AM +, fxkl47BF wrote:
>
> in a different mailing list it was implied that if a person uses protonmail
> they must be up to no good
> i've used protonmail for about 6 months now and been satisfied
> what am i missing
>
Services like protonmail have an importan
19 matches
Mail list logo