On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 06:41:44PM +0100, Robert Land wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 03:55:06PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> > BTW scratch MAILPATH advice. I've just experimented with it and mutt's
> > ignoring it. Seems it only recognises it as a compiled-in default.
>
> Could you put the first sente
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 01:43:16PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
| On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 01:26:57PM +0100, Robert Land wrote:
| > Derrick, please forgive me if this question sounds stupid ( I know
| > I have to reread a lot of network stuff), but I have the impression
| > that the high-availability
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 03:55:06PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 06:42:46PM +0100, Robert Land wrote:
> > Good idea, found the setting in login.defs. I did a:
> >
> > MAIL_DIR/var/spool/mail
> > #MAIL_FILE .mail
> > MAILFILE/home/rland/muttmail/inbox
> >
> >
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 06:42:46PM +0100, Robert Land wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 08:07:13PM +, Pigeon wrote:
>
> > Without knowing the details of your setup, I don't know if you've
> > configured it so that nothing ever ends up in /var/spool/mail/rland. I
> > think the safest thing to do
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 01:26:57PM +0100, Robert Land wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 04:04:32PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> > Note that the data stream looks the same, except there is no response
> > from the server. The "batched" comes from the intent that the data
> > stream will be
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 04:04:32PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> Note that the data stream looks the same, except there is no response
> from the server. The "batched" comes from the intent that the data
> stream will be saved and then later fed into an MTA. An example
> usage, as Colin
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 05:12:16PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
| On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 09:49:41PM +0100, Robert Land wrote:
| > On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 02:02:10PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
| > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:56:08PM +0100, Robert Land wrote:
| > > | What I'm realy unsure ab
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 07:36:54PM +0100, Robert Land wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 05:12:16PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Batched SMTP is a slightly more specialized technique, used when you're
> > getting a group of messages from some source other than normal SMTP and
> > injecting them int
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 05:12:16PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> Batched SMTP is a slightly more specialized technique, used when you're
> getting a group of messages from some source other than normal SMTP and
> injecting them into the mail system all at once. The basic idea is that
> you save (i.
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 08:07:13PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> Without knowing the details of your setup, I don't know if you've
> configured it so that nothing ever ends up in /var/spool/mail/rland. I
> think the safest thing to do is to set MAILPATH to include both
> /var/spool/mail and whatever dire
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 09:49:41PM +0100, Robert Land wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 02:02:10PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:56:08PM +0100, Robert Land wrote:
> > | What I'm realy unsure about is if _all_ mail, even the one
> > | sent by the lowlevel 'mail' p
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 02:02:10PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:56:08PM +0100, Robert Land wrote:
> | What I'm realy unsure about is if _all_ mail, even the one
> | sent by the lowlevel 'mail' program goes through port 25.
>
> No. Many unix programs use a local
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 07:10:19PM +0100, Robert Land wrote:
> Kind thanks for the help.
> Sending mail to root imediatly showed up in my mailbox. Yet one thing
> puzzles me here:
>
> The mail to root was in the inbox I had defined in my ~/.forward file.
> Contrary to this I have a spool file in /
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 06:27:04PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 07:10:19PM +0100, Robert Land wrote:
> > By the way, does Mutt 1.4 enable to jump up to previous messages
> > (whilest in the pager). The version 1.0.1i only allows me to 'space'
> > me downwards in a thread.
>
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:56:08PM +0100, Robert Land wrote:
> I'm not very experienced with unix/linux and would
> appreciate some information on the mail topic.
>
> I have this one box system, using my general account
> 'rland' and sometimes root for system configuration.
>
> What I would like
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:56:08PM +0100, Robert Land wrote:
| I'm not very experienced with unix/linux and would
| appreciate some information on the mail topic.
|
| I have this one box system, using my general account
| 'rland' and sometimes root for system configuration.
|
| What I would like
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 07:10:19PM +0100, Robert Land wrote:
> By the way, does Mutt 1.4 enable to jump up to previous messages
> (whilest in the pager). The version 1.0.1i only allows me to 'space'
> me downwards in a thread.
Cursor keys, or vi-style j (down) or k (up).
--
Colin Watson
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 11:47:41AM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Your understanding is correct. All system mail is sent through port 25,
> even stuff generated by the low level programs. In fact, it's more
> likely to be the high level stuff (like mozilla mail) that can operate
> independently of
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:56:08PM +0100, Robert Land wrote:
> What I'm realy unsure about is if _all_ mail, even the one
> sent by the lowlevel 'mail' program goes through port 25.
Might not literally be a TCP connection to port 25, but if not that then
it'll be /usr/sbin/sendmail (a link to exim
This one time, at band camp, Robert Land said:
> I'm not very experienced with unix/linux and would appreciate some
> information on the mail topic.
>
> I have this one box system, using my general account 'rland' and
> sometimes root for system configuration.
>
> What I would like to know is if/
Robert Land declaimed:
> I'm not very experienced with unix/linux and would
> appreciate some information on the mail topic.
>
> I have this one box system, using my general account
> 'rland' and sometimes root for system configuration.
>
> What I would like to know is if/how rland recieves mail
21 matches
Mail list logo