Re: lm_sensors does not support my board with w83627ehf

Patrick Zaloum wrote: Final Thought - Addendum to step 6... DO remove lm-sensors package, or change the Makefile to install to /usr. It will otherwise install to /usr/local and you will have duplicates. On Feb 12, 2008 11:26 PM, Patrick Zaloum <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wr

Re: lm_sensors does not support my board with w83627ehf

Final Thought - Addendum to step 6... DO remove lm-sensors package, or change the Makefile to install to /usr. It will otherwise install to /usr/local and you will have duplicates. On Feb 12, 2008 11:26 PM, Patrick Zaloum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Problem SOLVED! > So for anyone using a new mo

Re: lm_sensors does not support my board with w83627ehf

Problem SOLVED! So for anyone using a new motherboard with Etch facing the same error many people were: FATAL: Error inserting w83627ehf (/lib/modules/2.6.18-6-686/kernel/drivers/hwmon/w83627ehf.ko): No such device The steps i took to successfully get it to work: 1. Upgrade to kernel 2.6.22 fro

Re: lm_sensors does not support my board with w83627ehf

On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:00:24 -0500 "Patrick Zaloum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually that's precicely what I just did, i'm running 2.6.22-3 from > backports now, but so far i'm not any better for trying. Now when i run > sensors i get the following error: > > > w83627dhg-i2c-9191-290 > ERR

Re: lm_sensors does not support my board with w83627ehf

Actually that's precicely what I just did, i'm running 2.6.22-3 from backports now, but so far i'm not any better for trying. Now when i run sensors i get the following error: w83627dhg-i2c-9191-290 ERROR: Can't get adapter or algorithm?!? So new question: What do i do now? :/ On Feb 12, 2

Re: lm_sensors does not support my board with w83627ehf

On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 08:21:26PM -0500, Patrick Zaloum wrote: > I have a modern motherboard (Asus p5kc) running Etch-r2. I know it has the > devices necessary to provide sensor data but the kernel version that etch is > built on (2.6.18) is not recent enough for the required module (w83627ehf) >

Re: lm_sensors shows wrong values

I am having the same problem that you have/had. I have 127C for all of my temp values and can't find the error. By any chance have you figured anything out? Thanks, Shawn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: lm_sensors procfs/sysfs problem

Lubos Vrbka wrote: > > #cut here > # I2C adapter drivers > i2c-i801 > # I2C chip drivers > # no driver for Smart Battery Charger yet > #cut here It seems your card is not supported by lm-sensors. Check http://www.lm-sensors.nu, specifically the supported devices sect

Re: lm_sensors procfs/sysfs problem

hi, sorry for a delay, i couldn't access my computer during the weekend. See how sensors-detect told me I needed the w83627hf and eeprom modules, as well as the i2c-isa module. The i2c-* modules are just the communication layer which must be used in conjuction with (in my case) w83627hf and eepr

Re: lm_sensors procfs/sysfs problem

Lubos Vrbka wrote: > Felipe Sateler wrote: >> This happens on my system when I unload w83627hf (which is the module I >> need for my chipset). Have you loaded the modules sensors-detect said you >> should load? Adding the lines in /etc/modules doesn't automatically load >> them (actually, yes, the

Re: lm_sensors procfs/sysfs problem

Felipe Sateler wrote: This happens on my system when I unload w83627hf (which is the module I need for my chipset). Have you loaded the modules sensors-detect said you should load? Adding the lines in /etc/modules doesn't automatically load them (actually, yes, they are loaded automatically, but

Re: lm_sensors procfs/sysfs problem

Lubos Vrbka wrote: > $ sensors > Can't access procfs/sysfs file > Unable to find i2c bus information; > For 2.6 kernels, make sure you have mounted sysfs and libsensors > was compiled with sysfs support! > For older kernels, make sure you have done 'modprobe i2c-proc'! This happens on my system w

Re: lm_sensors in 2.6.12

phyrster on 31/07/05 11:45, wrote: On 19:38 Sat 30 Jul 2005, Adam Hardy wrote: When I installed the new kernel with the debian package, I configured it with make xconfig, but I didn't see any choices for i2c_i801 in the i2c section. Now I see it, but it is greyed out and I cannot select it.

Re: lm_sensors

On 19:38 Sat 30 Jul 2005, Adam Hardy wrote: > When I installed the new kernel with the debian package, I configured it > with make xconfig, but I didn't see any choices for i2c_i801 in the i2c > section. Now I see it, but it is greyed out and I cannot select it. Not sure what's wrong. try 'make

Re: Packaging system and non-Debian packages [was: Re: lm_sensors]

On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 05:05:27AM +, Pigeon wrote: > On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 02:09:04AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 03:49:57PM +, Pigeon wrote: > > > It would be useful to know how to do this in the more general case, > > > where there isn't a convenient comma

Re: Packaging system and non-Debian packages [was: Re: lm_sensors]

On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 07:52:18PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote: > > 3) get the woody backport of X4.2 from >http://people.debian.org/~blade/woody/ :) Nah, just looked there. His is the testing version (4.2.1), I have 4.2.0. But thanks anyway. Pigeon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: lm_sensors

...snip... Thanks to all and George,David,Jsen and Hugo Let me explain somewhat better what's my pb: My MB is a ASUS P4T533-R with an ASB100 - Bach chip ( w83781d ??) And have kernels 2.4.20-bf24, 2.4.18-bf24, 2.4.686 and my own 2.4.20 installed. Yes by old-way I mean bzImage, etc... ( all manu

Re: Packaging system and non-Debian packages [was: Re: lm_sensors]

On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 02:09:04AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 03:49:57PM +, Pigeon wrote: > > It would be useful to know how to do this in the more general case, > > where there isn't a convenient command like make-kpkg. > > > > My particular case is X 4.2.0, which

Re: Packaging system and non-Debian packages [was: Re: lm_sensors]

On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 02:09:04AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 03:49:57PM +, Pigeon wrote: > > It would be useful to know how to do this in the more general case, > > where there isn't a convenient command like make-kpkg. > > > > My particular case is X 4.2.0, which

Re: Packaging system and non-Debian packages [was: Re: lm_sensors]

On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 03:49:57PM +, Pigeon wrote: > It would be useful to know how to do this in the more general case, > where there isn't a convenient command like make-kpkg. > > My particular case is X 4.2.0, which I downloaded the source of and > compiled for slink, then for woody when I

Re: lm_sensors

George Georgalis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Since you (mess-mate) probably have your own reasons and desires to > continue to use your own kernel, another alternative is to make a > 'dummy' deb info entry. The 'equivs' package can do this. But, really, there are better options. Foremost is us

Packaging system and non-Debian packages [was: Re: lm_sensors]

On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 08:01:25PM -0700, Hugo Graumann wrote: > * On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:00:17AM +0100, mess-mate ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Sorry, this error messages appaers on the install of this i2c package : > > dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of i2c-2.4.20: > > i2c-2

Re: lm_sensors

On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 11:42:38AM +0800, Jsen wrote: >* Hugo Graumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> * On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:00:17AM +0100, mess-mate ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> > Sorry, this error messages appaers on the install of this i2c package : >> > dpkg: dependency problems prevent

Re: lm_sensors

* Hugo Graumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > * On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:00:17AM +0100, mess-mate ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 09:42:11 -0700 > > Hugo Graumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > | * On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 02:19:45PM -0500, karrottop ([EMAIL PROT

Re: lm_sensors

* On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:00:17AM +0100, mess-mate ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 09:42:11 -0700 > Hugo Graumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > | * On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 02:19:45PM -0500, karrottop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > | > > | > I am re-posting this because

Re: lm_sensors

Hi, On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 09:42:11 -0700 Hugo Graumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | * On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 02:19:45PM -0500, karrottop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: | > | > I am re-posting this because I was made aware I sent it as a reply to | > another post. Sorry about that, so without further

Re: lm_sensors

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:42:11AM -0700, Hugo Graumann wrote: > > Got hardware sensors working on a few motherboards here and even > took notes on how it was done. Perhaps these notes might be useful to you. Thanks Hugo! Johann -- Johann Spies Telefoon: 021-808 4036 Informasietegnolog

Re: lm_sensors

worked like a charm, thanks a bunch. On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 11:42, Hugo Graumann wrote: > * On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 02:19:45PM -0500, karrottop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > I am re-posting this because I was made aware I sent it as a reply to > > another post. Sorry about that, so without f

Re: lm_sensors

* On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 02:19:45PM -0500, karrottop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > I am re-posting this because I was made aware I sent it as a reply to > another post. Sorry about that, so without further adue here is my > intended post now... > > > I am having a great deal of trouble gettin

Re: lm_sensors

karrottop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Although I am sure I have about 75% of what I need to do complete, could > somebody give me a walkthrough of getting lm-sensors up and running on > debian? The goal being getting some sort of information with the > command sensors or with gkrellm's sensor pl

Re: lm_sensors

Mirek Dobsicek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've just recompiled kernel 2.4.18 a inserted all i2c* as modules. > Then installed lm_sensors deb package. > It wants i2c-viapro (my mother board is MSI Turbo with this chip) > but this module is not in kernel tree. Where can I get it a and > how to com

Re: lm_sensors with 2.4.9

Julio Merino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JM> On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 09:25:54AM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: RB> This sounds about right; it's what I did. I used the debian RB> source packages (i2c-source and lm-sensors-source, as I recall). RB> RB> You do need to disable i2c in the main kernel

Re: lm_sensors with 2.4.9

On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 09:25:54AM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: > This sounds about right; it's what I did. I used the debian source > packages (i2c-source and lm-sensors-source, as I recall). > > You do need to disable i2c in the main kernel build. > > I'm not sure what you mean by the phrase "ou

Re: lm_sensors with 2.4.9

This sounds about right; it's what I did. I used the debian source packages (i2c-source and lm-sensors-source, as I recall). You do need to disable i2c in the main kernel build. I'm not sure what you mean by the phrase "outside the kernel". If you use kernel-package it's all set up to build

Re: lm_sensors with 2.4.9

Julio Merino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JM> I want to compile lm_sensors. I'm using kernel 2.4.9 on woody. JM> JM> I've got my kernel and disable its i2c and bttv support. Why? Oh, they JM> say that i2c is needed to be updated, and I guess that bttv should also JM> be updated... JM> JM> So, I've

Re: lm_sensors with 2.4.9

Julio Merino wrote: > > Hi all, > > I want to compile lm_sensors. I'm using kernel 2.4.9 on woody. > > I've got my kernel and disable its i2c and bttv support. Why? Oh, they > say that i2c is needed to be updated, and I guess that bttv should also > be updated... > > So, I've got the i2c packag

Re: lm_sensors temp readings only 8C

On Thursday 17 May 2001 09:16, mikepolniak wrote: > Just installed lm_sensors for via-pro chipset VT82c596 and ran sensors: > > max1617-i2c-0-18 > Adapter: SMBus vt82c596 adapter at 5000 > Algorithm: Non-I2C SMBus adapter > temp: +8.0°C (min = +4°C, max = +0°C) > > In /proc/sys/dev/sensors/

Re: lm_sensors and ABit KT7A

On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Damon Muller wrote: > Hi folks, > > I recently upgraded up system from a K6-2 350, to a K7 900, running on > an ABit KT7A Motherboard. This is all well and good and works fine and > is very stable... > > Anyway, I was reading recently about using lm_sensors to display things