Re: lm-sensors build, sanity check

2001-12-12 Thread David Z Maze
Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MW> On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:06:13AM -0500, David Z Maze wrote: DZM> If you're using an older kernel or want the updated i2c drivers, DZM> you can also install them from the i2c-source package (in which DZM> case you should completely disable i2c in the

Re: lm-sensors build, sanity check

2001-12-11 Thread Marc Wilson
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:06:13AM -0500, David Z Maze wrote: > If you're using an older kernel or want the updated i2c drivers, you can > also install them from the i2c-source package (in which case you should > completely disable i2c in the kernel). Doesn't the documentation say different? I'm

Re: lm-sensors build, sanity check

2001-12-11 Thread David Z Maze
Stan Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: SB> OK, I'm trying to get lm-ensors working. Several people have pointed me to SB> the lm-sensors source, and i2c source packages, and the kernel-package SB> package. SB> SB> I'm already building kernels using the kernel-package tools. One of the SB> nice thi

Re: lm-sensors build, sanity check

2001-12-10 Thread Marc Wilson
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:54:17PM -0500, Stan Brown wrote: > I'm already building kernels using the kernel-package tools. One of the > nice things about this is that I can place the kernel sources in arbitrary > places, such as ~/kernel_build/. If I am reading the lm-sensrs > source README corectl