On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Colin Watson wrote:
> Nope. See my earlier message about the different effects using dselect
> and using apt have on the status file.
>
Thanks Gary and Colin. I stand corrected. Since I haven't used dselect
for over a year, my status file must be completely out of sync with
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 01:45:19PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Hereward Cooper wrote:
> > But once I installed the -dev via apt-get, "dpkg -l *xml2*"
> > _did_ list the file.
>
> Sorry I didn't make that clear did I? dpkg -l only accepts *installed*
> package names.
Nope.
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 01:45:19PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Hereward Cooper wrote:
>
> > But once I installed the -dev via apt-get, "dpkg -l *xml2*"
> > _did_ list the file.
> >
>
> Sorry I didn't make that clear did I? dpkg -l only accepts *installed*
> package names.
"Jaldhar H. Vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Hereward Cooper wrote:
>
> > But once I installed the -dev via apt-get, "dpkg -l *xml2*"
> > _did_ list the file.
> >
>
> Sorry I didn't make that clear did I? dpkg -l only accepts *installed*
> package names.
Yep. You can't u
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Hereward Cooper wrote:
> But once I installed the -dev via apt-get, "dpkg -l *xml2*"
> _did_ list the file.
>
Sorry I didn't make that clear did I? dpkg -l only accepts *installed*
package names.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cool that works! But now comes the question, why didn't
> DPKG
> > tell me I had -dev, it didn't reported libxml2-dev when I
> did a
> > "dpkg -l *xml2*, only libxml2?
>
> dpkg -l doesn't work that way, it only accepts package names.
> What you
> want to do is
>
> $ dpkg -l | grep xml2
But
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 12:48:31PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Hereward Cooper wrote:
> > Cool that works! But now comes the question, why didn't DPKG
> > tell me I had -dev, it didn't reported libxml2-dev when I did a
> > "dpkg -l *xml2*, only libxml2?
>
> dpkg -l doesn't
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Hereward Cooper wrote:
> Cool that works! But now comes the question, why didn't DPKG
> tell me I had -dev, it didn't reported libxml2-dev when I did a
> "dpkg -l *xml2*, only libxml2?
dpkg -l doesn't work that way, it only accepts package names. What you
want to do is
$ dpk
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Hereward Cooper wrote:
>
> > So how do I get libxml2 to be reconized
> > correctly with xml2-config installed?
> >
>
> # apt-get install libxml2-dev
Cool that works! But now comes the question, why didn't DPKG
tell me I had -dev, it didn't reported libxml2-dev when I did a
My guess would be you have the libxml-dev package install'd
and need to install the libxml2-dev package if you plan on compiling
code that depends on libxml2... Also if it is an already packaged
app that you are just trying to recompile you should be able to do
a 'apt-get build-dep ' and ge
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Hereward Cooper wrote:
> So how do I get libxml2 to be reconized
> correctly with xml2-config installed?
>
# apt-get install libxml2-dev
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11 matches
Mail list logo
