Thanks Gérard, Ron, and José.
I'll look into your suggstions. Running sudo apt-get
install -t unstable libgphoto2-2 tells me that I have
the latest version. I'll have to read up on the
backports a little more. Otherwise, I am going to get
the source files and attempt to compile and install
them.
--- Gregory Bushta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greets,
> I am wondering how broken Sarge would become if I
> allowed an unstable install of libgphoto2-2 to
> complete.
> I changed the apt sources list from stable to
> unstable. Then ran apt-get update. That took a
> while. Then I ran apt-g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/26/06 20:04, Gregory Bushta wrote:
> Greets,
> I am wondering how broken Sarge would become if I
> allowed an unstable install of libgphoto2-2 to
> complete.
> I changed the apt sources list from stable to
> unstable. Then ran apt-get update.
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 06:04:45PM -0700, Gregory Bushta wrote:
From: Gregory Bushta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: libgphoto2-2 (sarge->sid)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on murphy.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 re
Gregory Bushta wrote:
Greets,
I am wondering how broken Sarge would become if I
allowed an unstable install of libgphoto2-2 to
complete.
I changed the apt sources list from stable to
unstable. Then ran apt-get update. That took a
while. Then I ran apt-get install libgphoto2-2. It
spit out t
5 matches
Mail list logo
