"Liam Ward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I decided to see if asking APT to install the libc5 package in
> simulate mode would suggest the removal of libc6 and it doesn't,
> which suggests I could simply install the libc5 package. However, I'm
> too scared to do it without checking that I'm not
On Wed, Jun 23, 1999 at 17:59:13 +0200, Nikolaus A Siegfried wrote:
> libg++.so.27 => /usr/lib/libg++.so.27 (0x40125000)
This is from the libg++272 package; for use with libc6. Install the
libg++27 package which has this library for use with libc5.
HTH,
Ray
--
LEADERSHIP A form of self-
On Tue, Jan 12, 1999 at 03:33:13PM -0700, Scott Scriven wrote:
> Hello..
>
> I'm using Debian 2.0 i386 (hamm), and can't get libc5 programs to run.
>
> The libc5 package is installed, and I've tried upgrading to the most
> recent frozen version. It hasn't helped.
>
> Every libc5 program gets a
On Mon, Aug 10, 1998 at 03:05:26PM +0200, Yves Van de Weyer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I installed Debian Linux 2.0.29 and wanted to add support for ppp.
2.0.29 is NOT a "debian version" it is the version of the Linux
kernel itself. However...if your kernel version is 2.0.29
and you havn't upgraded it o
Brian Morgan wrote:
>
> I'm having trouble setting up xwindows in debian 2.0. I install
> Xwindows as an option when installing debian 2.0 (kernel 2.0.33), but
> get error messages all over the place about missing libraries when I
> type xdm or startx. In running dselect, I see that I have libc6
> "Noah" == Noah L Meyerhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Tor" == Tor Slettnes wrote:
Tor> It seems that if I have /usr/X11R6/lib in my
Tor> $LD_LIBRARY_PATH, libc5 applications such as Netscape,
Tor> StarOffice 4.0 and WordPerfect causes segmentation fault
Tor> right awa
On Tue, Jun 02, 1998 at 03:34:20AM -0700, Tor Slettnes wrote:
> Again, the problem goes away without /usr/X11R6/lib in
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
Why do you need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH anyway?
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Debian packages at ft
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 2 Jun 1998, Tor Slettnes wrote:
>
> It seems that if I have /usr/X11R6/lib in my $LD_LIBRARY_PATH,
> libc5 applications such as Netscape, StarOffice 4.0 and WordPerfect
> causes segmentation fault right away.
Here's my best attempt at an explanation of all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tue, 02 Jun 1998, Tor Slettnes wrote:
>> "Christian" == Christian Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> It seems that if I have /usr/X11R6/lib in my $LD_LIBRARY_PATH,
>>> libc5 applications such as Netscape, StarOffice 4.0 and
>>> WordPerfec
> "Christian" == Christian Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It seems that if I have /usr/X11R6/lib in my $LD_LIBRARY_PATH,
>> libc5 applications such as Netscape, StarOffice 4.0 and
>> WordPerfect causes segmentation fault right away.
>>
>> I then tried the glibc2 (li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tue, 02 Jun 1998, Tor Slettnes wrote:
>It seems that if I have /usr/X11R6/lib in my $LD_LIBRARY_PATH,
>libc5 applications such as Netscape, StarOffice 4.0 and WordPerfect
>causes segmentation fault right away.
>
>I then tried the glibc2 (libc6) version of Nets
Nuno Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When I try to install libc6 I get messages of dependencies with libc5!
> :-(
> I can't remove the libc5 package!
>
> How should I install libc6 ?
The way I did it was to upgrade my libc5 to the latest package version
(i.e. from hamm) first. (libc6
Nuno Carvalho wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to install KDE, and some others things, but it needs libc6.
> When I try to install libc6 I get messages of dependencies with libc5!
>:-(
> I can't remove the libc5 package!
No, you must first upgrade libc5.
The full instructions are in the
On Tue, 10 Feb 1998, Alex Yukhimets wrote:
> > I just tried installing the RedHat CDE package into a Debian unstable
> > system. It was compiled with an oldish version of libc5 and not libc6
> > which the unstable release is based on. I was successful in
> > converting the rpm files to deb files
Alex Yukhimets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm sure there is not the problem that the package is not *.deb.
> The problem here is that it was not linked with specific major version
> of libc. If you try to do "ldd /path/to/some/CDE/executable/or/library"
> I bet that you'll get dependence on lib
On Mon, 19 Jan 1998, Tom Ed White wrote:
> Is it possible to use libc5 and libc6 together? There are a couple of
> programs in "hamm" that I would like to try, but I heard somewhere that
> the two libs can't both be installed.
http://www.gate.net/~storm/FAQ/
--
Scott K. Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Mon, 12 Jan 1998, Ian & Gill Watkins wrote:
> I want to upgrade one or two of the packages on my system beyond the
> stable distribution. The newer packages are all requiring libc6, but
> that conflicts (in DSELECT) with libc5 which is a dependence to a _very_
> large number of programs. =:
Nils Rennebarth wrote:
> I tried to be clear but... anyway, my /etc/nsswitch.conf looks like this:
>
> #---cut here to damage your monitor--
> # /etc/nsswitch.conf
> #
> # Example configuration of GNU Name Service Switch functionality.
> #
>
> passwd: c
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Nils Rennebarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>As for documentation try the command
> info libc
>then look at the section
>* Name Service Switch
Well you could also just read the /usr/doc/nis/nis.debian.howto.gz
file which explains everything in detail.
Mike.
--
On Wed, Jan 14, 1998 at 09:18:55AM -0800, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote:
> Nils Rennebarth wrote:
> > > passwd: db files
> > > group: db files
> > > shadow: db files
> > For these three replace "db files" with "compat" and you should be done.
> How should it read? The HOW
On Wed, 14 Jan 1998, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote:
> Also, I am in Panic Mode now.
> * If I am unable to log in as root, how do I fix what I did to
> nsswitch.conf? I was sensible enough to backup the old file before
> making the changes. I am unable to locate my emergency disk (or
> whatev
Nils Rennebarth wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 1998 at 09:26:27PM -0800, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote:
> > After the upgrade, I am unable to log into my machine with a username in
> > YP.
> > $ cat /etc/nsswitch.conf
> > passwd: db files
> > group: db files
> > shadow: db files
On Tue, Jan 13, 1998 at 09:26:27PM -0800, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote:
> After the upgrade, I am unable to log into my machine with a username in
> YP.
>
> $ cat /etc/passwd
>
> ...some stuff...
>
> +::0:0:::
OK
> $ cat /etc/nsswitch.conf
> passwd: db files
> group: db files
On Tue, 13 Jan 1998, Scott Ellis wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 1998, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote:
>
> > * I am downloading the entire hamm binary-i386, contrib and non-free
> > tree to a directory (actually, my home directory) on an NFS server. Is
> > there a possibility that NFS might stop working
On Tue, 13 Jan 1998, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote:
> I read the mini HOWTO and reports in this mailing list about unstable
> being "stable enough". My machine is kind of a production server. The
> world would not end if it goes down for a day or so. But still it is
> important to have it up a
On Tue, 13 Jan 1998, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote:
> * I am downloading the entire hamm binary-i386, contrib and non-free
> tree to a directory (actually, my home directory) on an NFS server. Is
> there a possibility that NFS might stop working during the upgrade
> process?
Why don't you just u
On Mon, 12 Jan 1998, Ian & Gill Watkins wrote:
> I want to upgrade one or two of the packages on my system beyond the stable
> distribution. The newer packages are all requiring libc6, but that conflicts
> (in DSELECT) with libc5 which is a dependence to a _very_ large number of
> programs.
Igor Grobman wrote:
>
>
> This version should be close to good enough. The major change since the last
> one that was posted is the ability to upgrade from files in the current dir
> instead of a local mirror requirement.
llug.sep.bnl.gov is a public nfs mount for debian. You can point the s
On Fri, 9 Jan 1998, Lindsay Allen wrote:
> I hope this is the final version for a while. The script works here on a
> freshly installed bo.
>
> Watch out for line folding.
>
> # sanity check that we are in the right place
> [ -f base/libc6_* ] || exit 9
9 is already used for perl_base failure.
I hope this is the final version for a while. The script works here on a
freshly installed bo.
Watch out for line folding.
--- cut here ---
#! /bin/sh
# upgrade a libc5 (bo) machine to libc6 (hamm).
# based on Scott Ellis' excellent "Debian libc5 to libc6 Mini-HOWTO"
# document at http://www
> > >
> > > Your libc5-libc6-Mini-HOWTO.txt saves many people from ruinning their
> > > operating systems. A few changes could save a few more people. When a
> > > person
> > > ruins zher operating system by badly adding packages from hamm, zhe
> > > consumes
> > > weeks of time. You might
On Tue, 23 Dec 1997, Jameson Burt wrote:
> This seems the correct approach. So, the libc5-libc6-Mini-HOWTO should say
> not just
>The minimum list of packages to install to be able to run unstable-
>branch packages is below. Install these packages one at a time in
>exactly the order
G. Kapetanios hat gesagt: // G. Kapetanios wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> A friend wants to upadate from libc5 to 6 . I have done that some time ago
> and can't rember the exact order . Can somebody let me know of the http
> address for libc5 tp libc6 HOWTO ?
>
- From the Howto: -
1.2. Finding update
On Sun, 16 Nov 1997, George Bonser wrote:
> Didn't save me. I followd the instructions on an old test system here and
> STILL managed to blow it up. I was tired and cranky ... got to the part where
> I
> manuall did a dpkg on libc6 ... but it conflicts with libc5 ... (dpkg -i
> libc6_2.0.4-1.i38
Maybe I have an old version ... at the very end it finally mentiones the
conflict. the last item in the howto. I think it should be moved up to
where the lists of packages you need are mentioned.
On 16-Nov-97 joost witteveen wrote:
>
> I'm sure that is mentioned in the libc5-libc6-mini-ho
Þann 16-Nov-97 skrifar Jameson Burt:
>
> Your libc5-libc6-Mini-HOWTO.txt saves many people from ruinning their
> operating systems. A few changes could save a few more people. When a
> person
> ruins zher operating system by badly adding packages from hamm, zhe consumes
> weeks of time. You
> >
> > Your libc5-libc6-Mini-HOWTO.txt saves many people from ruinning their
> > operating systems. A few changes could save a few more people. When a
> > person
> > ruins zher operating system by badly adding packages from hamm, zhe
> > consumes
> > weeks of time. You might save tens of p
>
> Your libc5-libc6-Mini-HOWTO.txt saves many people from ruinning their
> operating systems. A few changes could save a few more people. When a
> person
> ruins zher operating system by badly adding packages from hamm, zhe consumes
> weeks of time. You might save tens of people a hundred w
Phil Nitschke wrote:
>
> I'm trying to delete older version(s) of tcl and Tk and install Tcl8.0
> and Tk8.0 using dselect (kernel rev. 2.0.30).
>
> The problem is that Tk8 requires libc6 which conflicts with libc5
> which is required by half the other applications I've got installed.
This is kno
Phil Nitschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm trying to delete older version(s) of tcl and Tk and install Tcl8.0
> and Tk8.0 using dselect (kernel rev. 2.0.30).
>
> The problem is that Tk8 requires libc6 which conflicts with libc5
> which is required by half the other applications I've got insta
On Tue, Oct 07, 1997 at 12:44:28AM -0400, Eloy A. Paris wrote:
: 8.8.5 is broken if you use maps. I applied the following patch that I found
: in www.sendmail.org and now my Sendmail 8.8.5 works fine. I'll start
: fighting Spam right now!!! (Yah :-)
Welcome to the battle!
I see what the p
At 06:16 PM 10/6/97 -0400, Jason Costomiris wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 06, 1997 at 01:45:52AM +, Eloy A. Paris wrote:
>
>: I do need some of the anti-spam features present in Sendmail 8.8.7
>: (8.8.5, the latest libc5 version, should have these anti-spam
>: features but they seem to be broken).
>
>8.
Michael Bravo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> I have the stable 1.3.1 installed. However, as I look at unstable on
> the ftp, I see lots of much more up-to-date and needed
> packages built with libc6. I have browsed through the mailing
> list archives, and found bits and pieces conc
On Fri, 25 Jul 1997, K.Y.Lo wrote:
: I have the basic debian 1.2, installed Libc5 and Binutils but it was an
error.
:
: install Libc5.deb then what happened?
:
: ldconfig: warning: can't open /usr/local/lib (no such file or directory),
: skipping.
:
: i know that, but i dont know what
On Tue, 22 Jul 1997, Bruno O. M. Simoes wrote:
> Hi all
> I have to install libc5-dev, but a dependency problem occurs with my
> libc5
> version. While I have 5.4.23-6, dpkg askes 5.4.33-3 libc5. How can I get a
> newer version of libc5.deb, for easy installation? Or can I force dpkg to
> i
>
>
> > You almost certainly can compile them
>
> OK. libc6 was one of the suspects when trying to compile lyx.
> ultimately I had to do a clean install (we hadn't found out about the
> hardware problems yet, either).
Note, BTW (just realise this) that if lynx has non-POSIX stuff in it
(forget
> You almost certainly can compile them
OK. libc6 was one of the suspects when trying to compile lyx.
ultimately I had to do a clean install (we hadn't found out about the
hardware problems yet, either).
> You shouldn't use programmes that use xforms anyway, as it's non-free
> software. Thi
>
> The burning quesiton on my mind is with regard to mixed applications.
> Lyx, in particular, relies on xpm and xforms, which are compiled with
> libc5. Can I stil compile lyx with libc6?
You almost certainly can compile them
You probably will not run into problems using the resulting binary,
The burning quesiton on my mind is with regard to mixed applications.
Lyx, in particular, relies on xpm and xforms, which are compiled with
libc5. Can I stil compile lyx with libc6?
rick
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e
> "Paul" == Paul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Paul> How can I install *BOTH* libc5 and libc6?? Can't we all just
Paul> get along? -Paul
As people have said, you can install them both--the packages named
'libc5' and 'libc6'. The complications are in the '-dev' packages and
the
On Wed, 16 Jul 1997 23:17:08 -0400, Paul Miller wrote:
>How can I install *BOTH* libc5 and libc6?? Can't we all just get along?
dpkg -i libc6 ; >
They coexsist fine, and I'm happy to say I'm now running apache 1.2.0 (a
libc6 compile)
-
> How can I install *BOTH* libc5 and libc6?? Can't we all just get along?
Just install them. There's no problem.
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PR
Hi Jesse,
I think the reason for this might be that the 'real' C library in
unstable is glibc-2, aka libc-6. It's the latest GNU C library with many
new things I don't have the slightest idea of ;-)
Fun,
Andree
--
| Institute of Geophysics phone: +49 40 4123 4389
> I'm not sure what the sequence was but I somehow have managed to get
> a version 5.4.23-6 of libc5 installed. Running dselect using the ftp
> method from ftp.debian.org and with the distributions as
> frozen unstable hamm/contrib hamm/non-free
> shows version 5.4.23-4 of libc5 as the available
>> kayak2 /home/bradshaw/dnload # dpkg -i libc5_5.4.23-6.deb
>> ldconfig: warning: can't open /usr/lib/libc.so (No such file or
>> directory), skipping
>> ldconfig: warning: can't open /usr/lib/libm.so (No such file or
>> directory), skipping
>>
>> Afterwards,
>>
>> /usr/lib/libc.so -> /lib/libc.so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Thu, 5 Jun 1997, Lee Bradshaw wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I was following the readme on the ftp site for upgrading. ldso upgraded
> with no warnings, but I got the following messages when upgrading libc5.
>
>
> kayak2 /home/bradshaw/dnload # dpkg -i libc5_5
Hi,
>>"Thomas" == Thomas Gebhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thomas> Hello, How do the include files in /usr/include/linux relate
Thomas> to the files in /usr/src/kernel-source-/include/linux ?
Thomas> Most of the include files are identical, others are
Thomas> different. Isn't this a possib
On Thu, 20 Feb 1997, Franck LE GALL - STAGIAIRE A FT.CNET/LAB/FCI/PIH wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have got Debian 1.2 installed on my system. I tried to
> install the non-free package scilab using dpkg. dpkg complains
> about libc_5.4.17-1 or more. I have libc5_5.4.13-1 installed on my
>
On Thu, 7 Nov 1996, Bruce Perens wrote:
> Look at some of the environment variables that are set when root logs in.
> Look especially at $SHELL and $PATH. Type "alias" and see if any well-known
> programs are aliased. These would be set by files like /root/.profile .
You were right. Ron Murray
Look at some of the environment variables that are set when root logs in.
Look especially at $SHELL and $PATH. Type "alias" and see if any well-known
programs are aliased. These would be set by files like /root/.profile .
Bruce
--
Bruce Perens K6BP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FR
Arrigo Triulzi writes:
> I know that it is intended that kenel header files come with
> libc5-dev and are not symlinks to the kernel source tree. Ok, this
> said let us come to my humble request: I would dearly like to use the
> symlink to my current kernel source on all boxes, this is becaus
61 matches
Mail list logo
