On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 06:58:41AM -0500, Keith & Cecile Schooley wrote:
> After compiling a kernel (2.2.17) for the first time, I received a startup
> message indicating that I was using kerneld and almost certainly didn't want
> to. I don't know how I turned it on, so I don't know how to turn it
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 11:51:22PM +0100, Moritz Schulte wrote:
> Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Am I supposed to continue running kerneld or not? When it does run
> > it says I don't want to run it with 2.2.x but everytime a fixed
> > modutils deb is released it readds it to rc2.d
Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am I supposed to continue running kerneld or not? When it does run
> it says I don't want to run it with 2.2.x but everytime a fixed
> modutils deb is released it readds it to rc2.d
$ head -9 /etc/init.d/kerneld
#!/bin/sh
#
# Start kerneld (on-demand loa
On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, brian moore wrote:
> > > Perhaps you should file a bug on it?
> >
> > Don't be that fast.
>
> Why not? A bug is a bug. 'man kerneld' is quite clear that kerneld
> should -not- be run on a 2.2 kernel. Yet /etc/init.d/kerneld is quite
> happy to run it on a 2.2 kernel bec
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 01:05:42PM +0300, Pavel M. Penev wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, brian moore wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 11:51:06AM +0100, Jonathan Heaney wrote:
> > > David Wright wrote:
> > > > The scripts /etc/init.d/{kerneld,modutils} have to be able to handle
> > > > both
Quoting brian moore ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 11:51:06AM +0100, Jonathan Heaney wrote:
> > David Wright wrote:
> > > The scripts /etc/init.d/{kerneld,modutils} have to be able to handle
> > > both 2.0 and 2.2 kernels with kerneld or kmod. You will see they do
> > > this by test
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, brian moore wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 11:51:06AM +0100, Jonathan Heaney wrote:
> > David Wright wrote:
> > > The scripts /etc/init.d/{kerneld,modutils} have to be able to handle
> > > both 2.0 and 2.2 kernels with kerneld or kmod. You will see they do
> > > this by te
On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 11:51:06AM +0100, Jonathan Heaney wrote:
> David Wright wrote:
> > The scripts /etc/init.d/{kerneld,modutils} have to be able to handle
> > both 2.0 and 2.2 kernels with kerneld or kmod. You will see they do
> > this by testing for the presence of /proc/sys/kernel/modprobe w
Quoting Jonathan Heaney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> David Wright wrote:
> > The scripts /etc/init.d/{kerneld,modutils} have to be able to handle
> > both 2.0 and 2.2 kernels with kerneld or kmod. You will see they do
> > this by testing for the presence of /proc/sys/kernel/modprobe which
> > only exists
David Wright wrote:
> The scripts /etc/init.d/{kerneld,modutils} have to be able to handle
> both 2.0 and 2.2 kernels with kerneld or kmod. You will see they do
> this by testing for the presence of /proc/sys/kernel/modprobe which
> only exists under 2.2.
>
> Perhaps you have a problem with your /
Quoting Erik van der Meulen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > After the reboot all seems well, except a message during boot:
> > kerneld: you almost certainly don't want to be running kerneld
> >with >= 2.2.x
>
> Thanks a lot for the various responses. I did a: mv kerneld kerneld.old
> in
On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 23:41:42 +0200, Erik van der Meulen wrote:
> After the reboot all seems well, except a message during boot:
>
> kerneld: you almost certainly don't want to be running kerneld
>with >= 2.2.x
>
Thanks a lot for the various responses. I did a: mv kerneld kerne
> You should check your startup scripts. Somewhere, you have enabled
> starting kerneld, you need to find that place and disable it.
cd /etc/init.d
mv kerneld kerneld.old
reboot
Jonathan
Ragga Muffin wrote:
>
> Erik van der Meulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>
> > I have just compiled my first kernel (!) on my Debian frozen box. It is
> > 2.2.15
> > After the reboot all seems well, except a message during boot:
> >
> > kerneld: you almost certainly don't want to be running kernel
Erik van der Meulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> I have just compiled my first kernel (!) on my Debian frozen box. It is
> 2.2.15
> After the reboot all seems well, except a message during boot:
>
> kerneld: you almost certainly don't want to be running kerneld
>with >= 2.2.x
>
> I
On Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 01:55:06PM -0500, Marc Sherman wrote:
> From: "Eric G . Miller"
> > >
> > There's no guarantee that an update of modutils won't wipe out those
> > changes. Better to change the links in the runlevels.
> >
> > $ update-rc.d -f kerneld remove
> > $ update-rc.d kerneld stop
On Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 03:02:30AM -0500, Marc Sherman wrote:
> What's the recommended way to remove kerneld? I
> didn't want to go mucking about in the rdN.d
> directories, so I just modified /etc/init.d/kerneld
> (which is what the links in the rcN.d directories
> point to) to add an
> echo
On Mon, Nov 22, 1999 at 10:25:13AM -0600, Oleg Krivosheev wrote:
>
> just out of curiousity, why are you trying to kill kerneld?
>
> are you trying to set kmod properly?
>
> if yes, could someone provide sample docs/configuration
> for kmod? The only info i was able to find is
> 1K file in kerne
Oleg Krivosheev wrote:
>
> just out of curiousity, why are you trying to kill kerneld?
I'm trying to kill kerneld just because I get the message "you almost
certainly don't want to be running kerneld with 2.2 kernels". So I'm
assuming that I don't want to be running kerneld. Maybe I am doing it
w
just out of curiousity, why are you trying to kill kerneld?
are you trying to set kmod properly?
if yes, could someone provide sample docs/configuration
for kmod? The only info i was able to find is
1K file in kernel sources
thank you
OK
On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Brendon Baumgartner wrote:
> I
On Sat, Nov 20, 1999 at 09:57:20PM +, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> Why is it that, even after religiously running update-rc.d -f kerneld
> remove and /etc/init.d/kerneld stop, kerneld keeps coming back every
> time the modutils package is upgraded?
>
Leave at least one kill link behind.
So... 'upda
I added a line "noauto" in /etc/modules file
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Stuart Ballard
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 1999 1:57 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: kerneld won't go away!
Why is it that, even after religiously run
Damn, C-x and C-c are to near to each other on the keyboard.
I solved it with help from #debian: kerneld 2.1.121 is broken.
Downgrading to modutils 2.1.85-11 solved the problem.
Sorry for the inconviniencee.
Jens
Jens Ritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hallo all,
>
> I have a strange probl
On Wed, 28 May 1997, Brian N. Borg wrote:
> I don't know that any low level drivers need to explicitly specified
> in /etc/modules. My ethernet card, scsi hostadapter, filesystems,
> etc. all load and unload on demand, as long as the right aliases
> are set in /etc/conf.modules.
>
You are cor
I don't know that any low level drivers need to explicitly specified
in /etc/modules. My ethernet card, scsi hostadapter, filesystems,
etc. all load and unload on demand, as long as the right aliases
are set in /etc/conf.modules.
--Brian Borg
Dale Scheetz wrote:
>
> On Tue, 27 May 1997, Har
On Tue, 27 May 1997, Harmon Sequoya Nine wrote:
>
> To use all of your modules, do you need only to put "auto" in your
> /etc/modules file, or do you need to put all of the modules that you
> want loaded on demand as well?
>
Not at all! If the comment is removed from auto then modules will be
lo
On Tue, 27 May 1997, Maarten Boekhold wrote:
> Do you have a line in /etc/conf.modules at the beginning that says:
>
> alias binfmt-332 iBCS
>
> If not, try adding this by hand and see what happens. I think this ought
> to fix your problems.
I tried that and it didn't help. However, I did figur
> However, when I don't load the iBCS module by hand, I find the following
> message in /var/log/daemon.log:
> May 27 14:10:24 terrapin modprobe: can't locate module binfmt-332
>
> Is there perhaps a bug in /etc/conf.modules? Any idea where else I could
> start looking to track this down? Cheers,
On Tue, 27 May 1997, Paul Seelig wrote:
> I never touched "/etc/conf.modules" in any case. Make sure that
> 'kerneld' gets actually started in "/etc/modules":
auto is all that is listed in my /etc/modules also and kerneld works fine
with my sound, floppy, vfat modules. From lsmod,
terrapin:~#
On Tue, 27 May 1997, Colin Telmer wrote:
> works perfectly. However, I have one more question: how do I get kerneld
> to automatically load and unload the iBCS module? I assume it has
> something to do with /etc/conf.modules, but looking through the
> mini-kerneld-HOWTO, it seems like it should do
Hi,
I don't use NFS with Linux, so I am not sure about that ...
As to compiling your own kernel, and the modules you have,
well, you configure a kernel by running make menuconfig (or xconfig
or config; the same basic configuration, the user interface is
nacurses, X, or the stan
I am sorry I did not mention in my previous email that Ioannis Tambouras
send me a suggestion about my problem. He suggested using the kdstat
program to see if I could find anything useful Unfortunately, I could not
get far with his suggestion. The kdstat program whn run produces the
following out
TECTED]>
To: "G. Kapetanios" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 02:39:30 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: kerneld activity
<<<<<<<<
>I am trying again because I think that this might be a bug.
> Some days ago I noticed
> after mounting an nfs
Just make a batch file with a ping command in it and call the file
'startinet.bat' Just ping your providers domain.
--
Stephen Pitts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux 1.1 on an Intel Pentium 150
Send a message with "Send PGP Key" in the subject to
Hi John, You wrote:
John>
John> Adam Heath writes: > I setup /sbin/request-route to run pppd...
John>
John> Where can I find documentation on request-route? I never heard
John> of it before this, and now I find that I have it.
/usr/doc/modules/README.ppp-slip
borik
--
Boris D. Beletsky [
Adam Heath writes:
> I setup /sbin/request-route to run pppd...
Where can I find documentation on request-route? I never heard of it
before this, and now I find that I have it.
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST:
--
> On Sat, 17 Nov 2096, Adam Heath wrote:
>
> > I have set kerneld to automatically run pppd through
/sbin/request-route
> > whenever I need the internet. The only problem is that I still get a
> > timeout(or I just need to re-request the connection) from the kernel.
I
> > run FTP, the
On Sat, 17 Nov 2096 16:03:16 EST "Adam Heath" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
g) wrote:
> I have set kerneld to automatically run pppd through /sbin/request-route
> whenever I need the internet. The only problem is that I still get a
> timeout(or I just need to re-request the connection) from the kernel. I
38 matches
Mail list logo
