Re: kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast

2004-05-29 Thread Ramiro Aceves
Uwe Dippel escribió: Having read around 100 posts on this list, I am still confused. I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far so good. I did change the link /dev/cdrom to /dev/hdb, consequentially. In order to have access to the drive, I also had to chgrp cdrom /dev/hdb.

Re: kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast

2004-04-25 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 09:48:54 +0100, stephen parkinson wrote: > actually xcdroast works quite nicely, in 2.6 with hdc=cdrom hdd=cdrom > and no ide-scsi anywhere in sight You *think* so; or it *does* ?? Then tell us your secret. I tried ... root=/dev/hda5 hdb=cdrom and re-detected the drive, etc.,

Re: kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast

2004-04-25 Thread Kenneth Macdoald Karlsen
On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 10:00, Uwe Dippel wrote: > On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 07:30:05 +0200, Mike Chandler wrote: > > > I give up. What is wrong with k3b? > > Everything. Especially the 'k'. Because it means you run KDE. Look at the > dependencies ! > That is one of the great things of xcdroast: You can

Re: kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast

2004-04-25 Thread stephen parkinson
Marc Wilson wrote: On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 07:49:20PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far so good. Whatwhatwhat? This changed? I upgraded from 2.4 to 2.6 and didn't lose my burner..

Re: kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast

2004-04-25 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 07:30:05 +0200, Mike Chandler wrote: > I give up. What is wrong with k3b? Everything. Especially the 'k'. Because it means you run KDE. Look at the dependencies ! That is one of the great things of xcdroast: You can run it from any desktop environment. Non-bloated ones, e.g.:

Re: kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast

2004-04-24 Thread Mike Chandler
On Saturday 24 April 2004 09:21 pm, Paul Johnson wrote: > Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 07:49:20PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > >> Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far > >> > so good.

Re: kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast

2004-04-24 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 07:49:20PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: >> Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far so >> > good. >> >> Whatwh

Re: kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast

2004-04-24 Thread Adam Aube
Marc Wilson wrote: > It's true that ide-scsi is depreciated, but I can't think of a > single front-end to cdrecord that supports ATAPI device specifications > other than k3b, and who wants to use *that*? > > Anyone want to put forward a front-end that does? I use CDR Toaster without problems. A

Re: kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast

2004-04-24 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 05:10:07 +0200, Marc Wilson wrote: > Ide-scsi will continue to work for some time. It, actually, doesn't. At least, not in all occasions. It is considered broken. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast

2004-04-24 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 04:50:07 +0200, Paul Johnson wrote: > Whatwhatwhat? This changed? I upgraded from 2.4 to 2.6 and didn't > lose my burner...I'm now confused and surprised I didn't. Because you left the scsi-emulation as boot parameter. But it is badly broken in 2.6.X and Linus fully recommen

Re: kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast

2004-04-24 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Sat, 24 Apr 2004 23:00:08 +0200, Adam Aube wrote: > In your case, since your CD-ROM is /dev/hdb, that should be "hdb=cdrom", not > "hdc=cdrom". Ah, sure. Typo. Question is: *do* I need this boot parameter ?? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr

Re: kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast

2004-04-24 Thread Marc Wilson
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 07:49:20PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far so > > good. > > Whatwhatwhat? This changed? I upgraded from 2.4 to 2.6 and didn't > lose my burner...I'm now confuse

Re: kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast

2004-04-24 Thread Paul Johnson
Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far so > good. Whatwhatwhat? This changed? I upgraded from 2.4 to 2.6 and didn't lose my burner...I'm now confused and surprised I didn't. -- Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Linux. You

Re: kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast

2004-04-24 Thread Adam Aube
Uwe Dippel wrote: > I did change the link /dev/cdrom to /dev/hdb, consequentially. > In order to have access to the drive, I also had to chgrp cdrom /dev/hdb. > > Some posters say that you need to add hdc=cdrom to your boot > parameters. Is this correct ? Anything needed at all ? In your case, s