Re: ipmasqadm question

1999-03-05 Thread Bob Nielsen
Bill, Yes, the thread was cut a bit. I didn't see the part about 2.2.1, sorry. I am not running ppp on my machine with 2.2.2, but Documentation/Changes says: As of 2.1.102, the IP firewalling code has been replaced; ipfwadm will no longer work. You need to obtain "ipchains," available from

Re: ipmasqadm question

1999-03-05 Thread wtopa
Subject: ipmasqadm question Date: Thu, Mar 04, 1999 at 01:25:07PM -0600 In reply to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Hello all, > > I seem to be lost on this issue, but here goes. I am running a mostly slink > system with a 2.2.1 kernel. Ho

Re: ipmasqadm question

1999-03-05 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
On Thu, 04 Mar 1999 19:52:34 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I checked with dselect and found I have ipmasq 3.3.1 installed already. >There is NO sign of ipmasqadm on my system anywhere. > >I have run 'find / -name ipmasqadm' with no hits. > >I do appreciate your help. Please don't stop now, but

Re: ipmasqadm question

1999-03-05 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
On Thu, 04 Mar 1999 20:24:38 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I believe ipfwadm only works with kernels < 2.1.90 or so. The reading >I get from the kernel source with 2.2.1 is that ipmasqadm is required. You're right. ipfwadm is obsolete for 2.2.x kernels. Ralf -- Ralf G. R. Bergs * Welkenra

Re: ipmasqadm question

1999-03-05 Thread whbell
Quoting Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Are you sure you don't mean ipfwadm (which is part of netbase)? > > Bob > > On Thu, 4 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I checked with dselect and found I have ipmasq 3.3.1 installed already. > > There is NO sign of ipmasqadm on my system anywher

Re: ipmasqadm question

1999-03-05 Thread Bob Nielsen
Are you sure you don't mean ipfwadm (which is part of netbase)? Bob On Thu, 4 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I checked with dselect and found I have ipmasq 3.3.1 installed already. > There is NO sign of ipmasqadm on my system anywhere. > > I have run 'find / -name ipmasqadm' with no hits.

Re: ipmasqadm question

1999-03-05 Thread whbell
Quoting "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, 04 Mar 1999 15:51:51 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >Please help me find this beast :-) > > I *think* it's > > http://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary- > i386/net/ipmasq_3.3.1.deb > > Unfortunately I'm still

Re: ipmasqadm question

1999-03-04 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
On Thu, 04 Mar 1999 15:51:51 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Please help me find this beast :-) I *think* it's http://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary- i386/net/ipmasq_3.3.1.deb Unfortunately I'm still under NT (:-) and I can't easily boot into the Debian system I have

Re: ipmasqadm question

1999-03-04 Thread whbell
Quoting "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, 04 Mar 1999 13:25:07 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >1- Am I on the right track with the ipmasqadm? > > Yes. YOu invoke it like this: > > ipmasqadm portfw ... > > >2- Is there a .deb out there for ipmasqadm? > > Yes. I'm pretty

Re: ipmasqadm question

1999-03-04 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
On Thu, 04 Mar 1999 13:25:07 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >1- Am I on the right track with the ipmasqadm? Yes. YOu invoke it like this: ipmasqadm portfw ... >2- Is there a .deb out there for ipmasqadm? Yes. I'm pretty sure that I did NOT compile it myself. I think I fetched the "unstable