On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 07:30:44PM -0500, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> The ipmasq rules files assume a ppp connection. I have a static ip so I
> need to use SNAT instead of MASQUERADE.
Congraturations.
FYI: For this kind of simple gateway machine, you can simply install
"ipmasq" package and foreget abou
The ipmasq rules files assume a ppp connection. I have a static ip so I
need to use SNAT instead of MASQUERADE.
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 03:27:38PM -0500, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 03:05:14PM -0500, Wayne wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 02:29:05PM -0500, Rick Pasotto wrote:
>
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 03:05:14PM -0500, Wayne wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 02:29:05PM -0500, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> > I'm running a 2.4.16 kernel and the default ipmasq from woody. The
> > primary machine 192.168.0.1 (with 2 nics) talks to the internet just
> > fine. The secondary machine 192.
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 02:29:05PM -0500, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> I'm running a 2.4.16 kernel and the default ipmasq from woody. The
> primary machine 192.168.0.1 (with 2 nics) talks to the internet just
> fine. The secondary machine 192.168.0.5 (running windows 98) can access
> the primary machine b
The problem apparently was that I had finally updated my configuration
/from etc/init.d/network to the newer /etc/init.d/networking and ran
'update-rc.d networking defaults', which caused networking to be run
after ipmasq. A look at netbase.postinst was illuminating.
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 11:2
5 matches
Mail list logo