Re: ipfwadm question.

2000-02-24 Thread Marc-Adrian Napoli
Hi there, > Just a thought. Do you other machines have 192.168.20.254 > shown as your gateway? Yes they were coming. I've realised my problem and solved it anyhow. Quick rundown: > : eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:E8:74:32:FD > : inet addr:192.168.20.254 Bcast:192.168.2

Re: ipfwadm question.

2000-02-23 Thread W. Paul Mills
Just a thought. Do you other machines have 192.168.20.254 shown as your gateway? Marc-Adrian Napoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : hi all, : quick ipfwadm question. : ethernet cards are as so: : eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:E8:74:32:FD : inet addr:192.168.20.254 Bcast:1

Re: ipfwadm question

1997-08-27 Thread Michele Dalla Silvestra
On Tue, 26 Aug 1997, Mario Olimpio de Menezes wrote: > My linux box acts as a ip-masq for the internal sub-net of > Windows machines. It has 3 cards: one for output to Internet, with a > valid IP address and 2 for the internal sub-net. > IP-Masq is working OK; all machines can telnet,