On 9/5/2013 10:32 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On 9/5/13, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 9/5/2013 5:36 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On 9/5/13, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
I have Debian 3.0.4 (via uname -r) on an ARM processor (after
update/upgrade) and am trying to get the kernel headers to compile a
module
On 9/5/2013 12:16 PM, Dom wrote:
On 05/09/13 16:45, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
I have Debian 3.0.4 (via uname -r) on an ARM processor (after
update/upgrade) and am trying to get the kernel headers to compile a
module for it.
aptitude shows the only headers available are for versions 2.6 and
3.2.0.4
On 9/5/2013 12:17 PM, Luther Blissett wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 23:33 -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
Hi, all,
I'm still pretty new to Debian, so this may be a *very* stupid question,
but here goes.
I have Debian 3.0.4 (via uname -r) on an ARM processor (after
update/upgrade) and am trying to g
On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 23:33 -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> I'm still pretty new to Debian, so this may be a *very* stupid question,
> but here goes.
>
> I have Debian 3.0.4 (via uname -r) on an ARM processor (after
> update/upgrade) and am trying to get the kernel headers to compil
On 05/09/13 16:45, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
I have Debian 3.0.4 (via uname -r) on an ARM processor (after
update/upgrade) and am trying to get the kernel headers to compile a
module for it.
aptitude shows the only headers available are for versions 2.6 and
3.2.0.4.
You might be better off asking
On 9/5/13, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 9/5/2013 5:36 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> On 9/5/13, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>> I have Debian 3.0.4 (via uname -r) on an ARM processor (after
>>> update/upgrade) and am trying to get the kernel headers to compile a
>>> module for it.
>>> aptitude shows the o
On 9/5/2013 5:36 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On 9/5/13, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
I'm still pretty new to Debian, so this may be a *very* stupid question,
but here goes.
I have Debian 3.0.4 (via uname -r) on an ARM processor (after
update/upgrade) and am trying to get the kernel headers to compile a
On 9/5/13, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> I'm still pretty new to Debian, so this may be a *very* stupid question,
> but here goes.
>
> I have Debian 3.0.4 (via uname -r) on an ARM processor (after
> update/upgrade) and am trying to get the kernel headers to compile a
> module for it.
uname -r has very s
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 06:56:31PM +0100, Richard Kimber wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:41:01 -0700
> Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What probably happened is they hit Reply-All and sent it as the
> > unsubscribe. So a message came here and one came to you directly from
> >
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002 02:10:26 +0200
Carel Fellinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you using standard mbox format? Could it be that it's just the end
> of another email that just happened to have a proper "From " header in
> its *body* ?
It's all MH and Sylpheed.
- Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On 0, Carel Fellinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 01:34:09PM +0100, Richard Kimber wrote:
> > I've just received a message from the list with no reference in the
> > headers to debian. Since I sort my mail on the basis of headers, the
> > message went into the wrong box.
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 01:34:09PM +0100, Richard Kimber wrote:
> I've just received a message from the list with no reference in the
> headers to debian. Since I sort my mail on the basis of headers, the
> message went into the wrong box. Has there been some change in how the
> list is administ
* Jens Grivolla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-10-2002 00:02]:
> If you reply could you confirm that this message is visible on the
> mailing list?
It is.
Bob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard Kimber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would advise filtering on the X-Mailing-List: header, not To: or Cc:,
> > if the latter is what you're doing. This should be reliable.
>
> Thanks, but there wasn't such a header in the message. No referen
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 17:36:02 -0400
Andy Saxena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It had the above To UNSUBSCRIBE stuff at the bottom. I assumed that
> > meant that it did.
> >
> > - Richard.
> >
>
> What did the "From: " header say?
From: Dale Hair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Richard.
--
To UNSUBS
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 06:11:24PM +0100, Richard Kimber wrote:
>
> It had the above To UNSUBSCRIBE stuff at the bottom. I assumed that meant
> that it did.
>
> - Richard.
>
What did the "From: " header say?
-Andy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:41:01 -0700
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What probably happened is they hit Reply-All and sent it as the
> unsubscribe. So a message came here and one came to you directly from
> some other message you sent.
>
> If it did not have a list header it did n
On Thursday 03 October 2002 08:54, Richard Kimber wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:17:57 +0100
>
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would advise filtering on the X-Mailing-List: header, not To: or Cc:,
> > if the latter is what you're doing. This should be reliable.
>
> Thanks, but ther
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 17:36:36 +0200
Robert Ian Smit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Richard Kimber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03-10-2002 15:07]:
> > I've just received a message from the list with no reference in the
> > headers to debian.
>
> How do you know that the message came from this list then?
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:17:57 +0100
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would advise filtering on the X-Mailing-List: header, not To: or Cc:,
> if the latter is what you're doing. This should be reliable.
Thanks, but there wasn't such a header in the message. No reference to
the list at a
This one time, at band camp, Richard Kimber said:
> I've just received a message from the list with no reference in the
> headers to debian. Since I sort my mail on the basis of headers, the
> message went into the wrong box. Has there been some change in how the
> list is administered?
>
> - R
* Richard Kimber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03-10-2002 15:07]:
> I've just received a message from the list with no reference in the
> headers to debian.
How do you know that the message came from this list then?
Bob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 01:34:09PM +0100, Richard Kimber wrote:
> I've just received a message from the list with no reference in the
> headers to debian. Since I sort my mail on the basis of headers, the
> message went into the wrong box. Has there been some change in how the
> list is administ
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 07:40:52PM -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am using mutt. When I read a message sometimes appears a lot of stuff in
> the
> header. I want only the "From:", "To:" and "Subject:" fields. How can I do
> that?
> Using the option ignore in the muttrc file seems
On [26-06-01 19:40], Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
> Using the option ignore in the muttrc file seems to be endless, because there
> is a lot of things to be ignored. I think that is better to tell mutt what to
> keep instead...
'ignore all' and 'unignore what-you-want-to-see':
ignore *
unignore
* Marcelo Chiapparini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I am using mutt. When I read a message sometimes appears a lot of stuff in
> the
> header. I want only the "From:", "To:" and "Subject:" fields. How can I do
> that?
> Using the option ignore in the muttrc file seems to be endless, because there
> i
Hi!
Thank you! it worked fine!
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 03:53:41PM -0700, Mark Wagnon wrote:
> On 06/26/01 19:40:52 -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
> > I am using mutt. When I read a message sometimes appears a lot of stuff in
> > the
> > header. I want only the "From:", "To:" and "Subject:" f
On 06/26/01 19:40:52 -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
> I am using mutt. When I read a message sometimes appears a lot of stuff in
> the
> header. I want only the "From:", "To:" and "Subject:" fields. How can I do
> that?
> Using the option ignore in the muttrc file seems to be endless, because
Pere Camps writes:
> I was just wondering if the .deb made the correct symlinks within the
>filesystem.
No, the deb correctly does not make the symlinks. Debian doesn't use them.
This is a FAQ. See /usr/doc/libc6/FAQ.Debian.gz.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
E
David,
> Were you unaware that kernel source provides kernel headers?
No, I was not unaware of that. I was just wondering if the .deb
made the correct symlinks within the filesystem. Like /usr/include/linux
or /urs/include/asm...
> > Should /usr/include/linux point to anywhere?
> Do you
Hi,
Ignore the directive about symlinks in /usr/include. The
Debian infrastructure should take care of that for you. In case
people are curious, the details of Debians kernel header handling can
be found in the document attached below.
manoj
$Id: README.headers,v 1.7 1998/
31 matches
Mail list logo
