Cal Paterson wrote:
> It's grammAr. Fool. A spelling and grammAr checker in your email
> client would have empowered you and (more importantly) prevented you
> from looking like a complete idiot. See the use now?
Yeah, and? It's email. It's rough drafy and ship. Don't like it, your
probl
On 11/13/05, Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These are precisely the people who shouldn't be using grammer software and
> should use spelling software with care. It is because just these people might
> not know there is a mistake in the words their software approves because
> they're s
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 02:38:02 -0500
Mark Grieveson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A function of computers is to help people to communicate, and become
> empowered. Some computer users are recent immigrants, for whom English
> is not their first language. Some computer users did not have a
> chance
On 2005/11/13, Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Mark Grieveson wrote:
>
> > It was very good. It would not only point out
> > grammar errors, but gave thorough explanations as
> > well (for example: "This sentence is in the
> > /passive voice, /ie, 'The ball was thrown by John'.
> > Consi
Mark Grieveson wrote:
> It was very good. It would not only point out grammar errors, but gave
> thorough explanations as well (for example: "This sentence is in the
> /passive voice, /ie, 'The ball was thrown by John'. Consider rewording
> to the /active voice,/ ie, 'John threw the ball'").
5 matches
Mail list logo
