On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 09:34:26 -0400, Jack Dodds wrote:
> Thanks to those who commented.
>
> I tried/etc/init.d/networking stop . When this is done, programs
> launch without delay. Of course, this makes it impossible for any
> program to access the Internet so it's not a solution!
Nope, n
On 2011-06-04, Jack Dodds wrote:
> This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
> --enig8C3A295D8BAF91ED98A88B02
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>
> Thanks to those who commented.
>
> I tried/etc/init.d/ne
On 06/04/2011 08:34 AM, Jack Dodds wrote:
Thanks to those who commented.
I tried/etc/init.d/networking stop . When this is done, programs
launch without delay. Of course, this makes it impossible for any
program to access the Internet so it's not a solution!
However, taking gedit as an
Thanks to those who commented.
I tried/etc/init.d/networking stop . When this is done, programs
launch without delay. Of course, this makes it impossible for any
program to access the Internet so it's not a solution!
However, taking gedit as an example,
Normal operation - Internet acces
On 06/03/11 at 10:17pm, Camaleón wrote:
> El 2011-06-03 a las 12:53 -0400, Thomas Milne escribió:
>
> (resending to the list)
>
> > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 05:38:23 -0400, Jack Dodds wrote:
> > >
> > > > I am running Lenny. The system is c
El 2011-06-03 a las 12:53 -0400, Thomas Milne escribió:
(resending to the list)
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 05:38:23 -0400, Jack Dodds wrote:
> >
> > > I am running Lenny. The system is connected to the Internet via a
> > > Linksys BEFSR81router
On 06/03/11 at 05:38am, Jack Dodds wrote:
>
> If the Internet is inaccessible - e.g. if the Ethernet cable is
> disconnected from the computer, or the cable modem power is
> disconnected, or if there are problems on the provider network - many
> GUI programs take a long time (about 60 seconds) to
On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 05:38:23 -0400, Jack Dodds wrote:
> I am running Lenny. The system is connected to the Internet via a
> Linksys BEFSR81router and a cable modem. My desktop is Gnome.
>
> If the Internet is inaccessible - e.g. if the Ethernet cable is
> disconnected from the computer, or the
On 4/26/06, Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rob Benton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The thing about KDE that I've never been a big fan of is their DCOP
> system. It takes time to get those processes started. That's not such
> a big deal if you use KDE as your environment because that's
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:16:16 +0100
Adam Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cool. Do you launch them just by kicking off kdesktop and gnome-panel
> somewhere in the openbox config?
I run fluxbox and start just about everything extra from my .xsession
file and have the option for the fluxbox panel
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 07:08:18PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 11:59 -0500, Rob Benton wrote:
> > Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 15:43 -0700, Bill Thompson wrote:
> > >
> > >>On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 15:01:39 -0700
> > >>Curtis Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 11:59 -0500, Rob Benton wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 15:43 -0700, Bill Thompson wrote:
> >
> >>On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 15:01:39 -0700
> >>Curtis Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >>I just switched to KDE from Gnome on Sid. In
Rob Benton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The thing about KDE that I've never been a big fan of is their DCOP
> system. It takes time to get those processes started. That's not such
> a big deal if you use KDE as your environment because that's loaded once
> on startup. But if you use Gnome and w
On 04/26/2006 02:20 PM, Christopher Nelson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 01:16:16PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
>
>>> Bill Thompson on 25/04/06 23:43, wrote:
>>
>I have also been playing with running openbox with Gnome and KDE
>components (for example, openbox using gnome-panel with kdes
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 01:16:16PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
> Bill Thompson on 25/04/06 23:43, wrote:
> >I have also been playing with running openbox with Gnome and KDE
> >components (for example, openbox using gnome-panel with kdesktop) which
> >uses less resources than any of them, but still has
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:16:16 +0100
Adam Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill Thompson on 25/04/06 23:43, wrote:
> > I have also been playing with running openbox with Gnome and KDE
> > components (for example, openbox using gnome-panel with kdesktop)
> > which uses less resources than any of th
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 15:43 -0700, Bill Thompson wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 15:01:39 -0700
Curtis Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
I just switched to KDE from Gnome on Sid. In my subjective opinion,
Gnome 2.14 runs much faster and with less resources than KDE 5.
Ron Johnson wrote:
I suppose that should've been version 2.8
Gotcha. What branch is that, Stable? Sid is at 2.14, and 2.8 is
old enough that I didn't believe that anyone is still using it...
Uhm yes that's stable (though I don't use gnome myself)
(Chances of breakage still make me feel I
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 12:05 +0200, Joris Huizer wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 16:15 -0600, Cameron Matheson wrote:
> >>Both desktops have been making huge strides lately in performance and
> >>what not. I hadn't used GNOME/KDE in about a year, but I have given the
> >>1.8 r
Bill Thompson on 25/04/06 23:43, wrote:
I have also been playing with running openbox with Gnome and KDE
components (for example, openbox using gnome-panel with kdesktop) which
uses less resources than any of them, but still has that "Desktop
Environment" convenience.
Cool. Do you launch them
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 16:15 -0600, Cameron Matheson wrote:
Both desktops have been making huge strides lately in performance and
what not. I hadn't used GNOME/KDE in about a year, but I have given the
1.8 release a whirl and it does seem a lot snappier.
Version 1.8? Am I
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 15:43 -0700, Bill Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 15:01:39 -0700
> Curtis Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> I just switched to KDE from Gnome on Sid. In my subjective opinion,
> Gnome 2.14 runs much faster and with less resources than KDE 5.4.
>
> Howeve
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 16:15 -0600, Cameron Matheson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 15:01 -0700, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
> > I remember sometime at the end of last year reading that KDE uses
> > less resources than Gnome. After reading that I had to install linux
> > on an older machine f
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 04:15:39PM -0600, Cameron Matheson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I still think GNOME/KDE (despite their improvements) are a little bit
> too fat for older systems w/out much ram... it's certainly not very
> groovy on my old 256M laptop. I generally use openbox, but if you're
> looking
Curtis Vaughan wrote:
I remember sometime at the end of last year reading that KDE uses less
resources than Gnome. After reading that I had to install linux on an
older machine for someone, so I put KDE on it. It worked OK.
Now I get the latest Linux Journal and they say in there than Gnome
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 03:14:20PM -0700, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
>
> On 25.04.2006, at 15:11, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
> >Curtis Vaughan wrote:
> >>I remember sometime at the end of last year reading that KDE uses
> >>less
> >>resources than Gnome. After reading that I had to install l
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 15:01:39 -0700
Curtis Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I remember sometime at the end of last year reading that KDE uses
> less resources than Gnome. After reading that I had to install linux
> on an older machine for someone, so I put KDE on it. It worked OK.
>
> Now
Curtis Vaughan wrote:
>
> On 25.04.2006, at 15:11, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
>>
>> If you are looking for low resource usage, then you want Window Maker
>> (my favorite), or fluxbox, or Enlightenment, or XFCE, or IceWM, or any
>> of the many other lightweight WMs.
>>
>> -Roberto
>
>
> No
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 15:01 -0700, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
> I remember sometime at the end of last year reading that KDE uses
> less resources than Gnome. After reading that I had to install linux
> on an older machine for someone, so I put KDE on it. It worked OK.
>
> Now I get the latest
On 25.04.2006, at 15:11, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
Curtis Vaughan wrote:
I remember sometime at the end of last year reading that KDE uses
less
resources than Gnome. After reading that I had to install linux
on an
older machine for someone, so I put KDE on it. It worked OK.
Now
Curtis Vaughan wrote:
> I remember sometime at the end of last year reading that KDE uses less
> resources than Gnome. After reading that I had to install linux on an
> older machine for someone, so I put KDE on it. It worked OK.
>
> Now I get the latest Linux Journal and they say in there than
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 03:45:33PM +0200, David Mat wrote:
> > Just installed sarge, the installer is great. Tthere is an option to
> > autodetect your video hardware, so it'll work right away for some harware.
>
> Hm, that's what I wanted to know. With Woody, installing X didn't
> autodetect
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 03:45:33PM +0200, David Mat wrote:
> Just installed sarge, the installer is great. Tthere is an option to
> autodetect your video hardware, so it'll work right away for some harware.
Hm, that's what I wanted to know. With Woody, installing X didn't
autodetect things prope
On 6/8/05, Jeronimo Pellegrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello.I have to install Linux on one box that I will admin remotely.A few users there will want to use GNOME (or maybe KDE, but it would befine if I install just GNOME). I'll have to make a short trip to install
the OS, and would like to do
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 09:18:53AM -0300, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have to install Linux on one box that I will admin remotely.
> A few users there will want to use GNOME (or maybe KDE, but it would be
> fine if I install just GNOME). I'll have to make a short trip to install
> th
Kent West wrote:
[snip]
I've seen this sort of behavior, but didn't find the answer 'till after
I no longer needed it. I've also seen postings about this sort of thing,
and the answers provided have been to add a line to /etc/X11/XXF86Config
something to the effect of "swcursor" "on". I don't r
SJ wrote:
I have a weird problem that is driving both me and my sysadmi roomie
to distraction.
Periodically, but on a very erratic basis, while in either
gnome-sawfish or kde where the mouse cursor shows to be is not where
the system thinks it is when I click on something.
For example (ascii
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 09:49:27AM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
> So you're saying that we will have KDE 2 and KDE 3.1 in sid (and,
> subsequently, sarge) at the same time?
No, we won't. However, the original transition plan [1] specified that
the libqt2 dependency chain would remain with the old C
J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> The gcc 3.2 transition (which was announced on debian-devel-announce) isn't
> complete yet; KDE2 apparently hasn't been rebuilt against the updated
> libraries yet or not all of its dependencies have made the transition
> themselves.
>
> > and is anyone working on it?
Colin Watson wrote:
> They have libfam in common too, and that's having problems with the g++
> 3.2 transition: GNOME 2 uses the g++ 3.2 version (libfam0c102) while KDE
> 2 uses (and needs to continue using) the g++ 2.95 version (libfam0), and
> the two need to conflict. I'm not sure what's being
Bart J. Himel wrote:
> I know this has probably already been answered, but I can't find it
> anywhere. I installed Debian Unstable on my computer a couple of weeks ago,
> but instead of installing Gnome2 it installed 1.4. When I try to use apt to
> install nautilus 2, it tells me it needs to rem
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 11:22:37 -0500, Bart J. Himel wrote:
> I know this has probably already been answered, but I can't find it
> anywhere. I installed Debian Unstable on my computer a couple of weeks ago,
If you're running unstable and not following the debian-devel-announce and
debian-devel
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 11:22:37AM -0500, Bart J. Himel wrote:
> I know this has probably already been answered, but I can't find it
> anywhere. I installed Debian Unstable on my computer a couple of weeks ago,
> but instead of installing Gnome2 it installed 1.4. When I try to use apt to
> instal
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 11:29:02AM +0200, DSC Siltec wrote:
>Does anybody have an idea about what is destabilizing my system, and
> -- more importantly how to reset these things back to "working"? Or are
> there files that I can simply transfer from another user's directory to
> my own, to re
Bruce Park wrote:
Hello debian users,
Can anyone tell me which one of these two desktop is better? I've been
using gnome eversince I've been using linux and I am told that KDE is a
better desktop by people yet they can't give me a solid reason as to why
it is better.
bp
_
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 08:09:57PM -0400, Bruce Park spake thusly:
> Hello debian users,
>
> Can anyone tell me which one of these two desktop is better? I've been
> using gnome eversince I've been using linux and I am told that KDE is a
> better desktop by people yet they can't give me a solid
On Sat, 2002-10-19 at 20:09, Bruce Park wrote:
> Hello debian users,
>
> Can anyone tell me which one of these two desktop is better? I've been using
> gnome eversince I've been using linux and I am told that KDE is a better
> desktop by people yet they can't give me a solid reason as to why it
On Saturday, 19 October 2002 10:09 AM Bruce Park said:
>Hello debian users,
>
>Can anyone tell me which one of these two desktop is better? I've been
using
>gnome eversince I've been using linux and I am told that KDE is a better
>desktop by people yet they can't give me a solid reason as to why
On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, Phillip Deackes wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jun 2001 01:16:40 -0400
> "Margarete Hans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What are the advantages/disadvantages of gnome and KDE? Basically,
> > which one should I install?
>
> Depends. We all have our favourite window manager (although KDE
On Sunday 10 June 2001 10:22, Phillip Deackes wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jun 2001 01:16:40 -0400
>
> "Margarete Hans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What are the advantages/disadvantages of gnome and KDE? Basically,
> > which one should I install?
> Obviously, these are personal observations and you will
On Sun, 10 Jun 2001 01:16:40 -0400
"Margarete Hans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What are the advantages/disadvantages of gnome and KDE? Basically,
> which one should I install?
Depends. We all have our favourite window manager (although KDE and Gnome
are more than window managers, they are more
From: "Margarete Hans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Subject: gnome/KDE
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 01:16:40 -0400
What are the advantages/disadvantages of gnome and KDE? Basically,
which one should I install?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
I personally dont like kde :-)
in my box kde app, the graphic is not good, it has a
black or color strips on the window title bar and
unstable. Kongquerer crashes with sig 11 ...
--- Margarete Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What are
the advantages/disadvantages of gnome and
> KDE? Basically,
Oh, as a postscript to what I just said, nothing prevents you from switching
later. I was happily in one environment and switched to the other about a
month ago. I still like to go and use blackbox every so often too.
Flexibility is good :-)
- David Nusinow
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Saturday 09 June 2001 10:16 pm, Margarete Hans wrote:
> What are the advantages/disadvantages of gnome and KDE? Basically,
> which one should I install?
Oh man... opening the doors to the furnace here...
I'd recommend downloading and trying both and deciding which you like then.
There are als
55 matches
Mail list logo
