Re: exim4 maybe too complex to remain useful

2007-09-11 Thread Jude DaShiell
What I meant was that if postfix had the capability to do smarthost authentication I didn't know about the syntax for it or where any such syntax would have been stored in configuration files. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E

Re: exim4 maybe too complex to remain useful

2007-09-11 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/11/07 18:23, Jude DaShiell wrote: > I used postfix for a very short time with a smarthost that at that time > didn't require authentication so had no need to check out what > capabilities postfix might or might not have had at that time with > re

Re: exim4 maybe too complex to remain useful

2007-09-11 Thread Jude DaShiell
I used postfix for a very short time with a smarthost that at that time didn't require authentication so had no need to check out what capabilities postfix might or might not have had at that time with respect to smarthost authentication. On Mon, 10 Sep 2007, Ron Johnson wrote: -BEGIN

Re: exim4 maybe too complex to remain useful

2007-09-10 Thread David
> > At some point I suppose I should write a script that will check which > network I'm on and invoke dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config with the right > options, but I'm not sure how to do that yet - any hints welcome! > whereami [1] and expect [2] [1] http://packages.debian.org/stable/net/whereami [

Re: exim4 maybe too complex to remain useful

2007-09-10 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 12:19:51PM +, Tyler Smith wrote: > On 2007-09-10, Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 06:42:32AM +, Jude DaShiell wrote: > >> If using exim4 and it's necessary to use a smarthoast where can that be > >> configured? I find sendmail l

Re: exim4 maybe too complex to remain useful

2007-09-10 Thread Tyler Smith
On 2007-09-10, Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 06:42:32AM +, Jude DaShiell wrote: >> If using exim4 and it's necessary to use a smarthoast where can that be >> configured? I find sendmail less complex than exim4 and all other mail >> transport agents I've t

Re: exim4 maybe too complex to remain useful

2007-09-10 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/10/07 04:27, Jude DaShiell wrote: > Thanks for the exim4 smart host help. I would almost go with postfix > except the smart host requires authentication but doesn't support any > encryption for doing authentication on their end. Maybe I just h

Re: exim4 maybe too complex to remain useful

2007-09-10 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/10/07 02:26, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 06:42:32AM +, Jude DaShiell wrote: >> If using exim4 and it's necessary to use a smarthoast where can that be >> configured? I find sendmail less complex than exim4 and all other m

Re: exim4 maybe too complex to remain useful

2007-09-10 Thread Jude DaShiell
Thanks for the exim4 smart host help. I would almost go with postfix except the smart host requires authentication but doesn't support any encryption for doing authentication on their end. It's probably what most internet service providers are now doing since ssl and cram md5 and tls are a ha

Re: exim4 maybe too complex to remain useful

2007-09-10 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 06:42:32AM +, Jude DaShiell wrote: > If using exim4 and it's necessary to use a smarthoast where can that be > configured? I find sendmail less complex than exim4 and all other mail > transport agents I've tried less complex than the pair of them. sudo dpkg-reconfigu