On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 21:17 +1000, flebber wrote:
> Hi
>
> This is my first post to the list so if i have done anything untoward
> please let me know.
>
> I am on debian etch using gnome I have been trying to get emacs or
> emacs21 as it seems to be called to work properly.
>
> It is not render
On 2007-03-14, Charles Blair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I recently installed the testing (etch) incarnation of debian,
> and have added emacs (emacs21). I would like to add gnumeric
> and a number of other packages, but aptitude warns me that, to
> do so, I have to downgrade some things (libc
Hi,
I am sorry for jumping in this thread a bit late. I hope that this is
still relevant.
On May 08 2006, Carl D. Blake wrote:
> I've been trying to install emacs21 on unstable for the last few days
> and aptitude keeps reporting that emacs21-bin-common package is
> broken.
If you are an Emacs u
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 02:42, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 17:49:57 -0700, kruton wrote:
> > > OK, I'll ask a stupid question. How do you setup
> > > the sources.list file
> > > so you can use unstable, but install emacs from
> > > testing at the same
> > > time?
> >
> > i don't
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 17:49:57 -0700, kruton wrote:
> > OK, I'll ask a stupid question. How do you setup
> > the sources.list file
> > so you can use unstable, but install emacs from
> > testing at the same
> > time?
>
> i don't think even testing is working... both testing
> and unstable have
On 5/9/06, Matthew R. Dempsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:06:59PM -0400, Michael Marsh wrote:
> The OP didn't say he wanted/needed GNU Emacs, he said he was trying to
> install emacs21.
I would have thought the latter implied the former.
> He can get essentially the sa
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:06:59PM -0400, Michael Marsh wrote:
> The OP didn't say he wanted/needed GNU Emacs, he said he was trying to
> install emacs21.
I would have thought the latter implied the former.
> He can get essentially the same functionality with xemacs21 while
> waiting for emacs2
On 5/9/06, Matthew R. Dempsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 07:41:35PM -0400, Michael Marsh wrote:
> You can also install xemacs21, which can live happily alongside
> emacs21, and has no dependencies on emacs21 (that I can see).
..., and is also not GNU Emacs.
And vim is n
> OK, I'll ask a stupid question. How do you setup
> the sources.list file
> so you can use unstable, but install emacs from
> testing at the same
> time?
i don't think even testing is working... both testing
and unstable have the same version number.. so wait
till the bug is fixed. (or use xemac
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 07:41:35PM -0400, Michael Marsh wrote:
> You can also install xemacs21, which can live happily alongside
> emacs21, and has no dependencies on emacs21 (that I can see).
..., and is also not GNU Emacs.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
On 5/9/06, Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you need emacs you can install the version from testing and forbid
further upgrades of these packages until this dependency issue is fixed.
You can also install xemacs21, which can live happily alongside
emacs21, and has no dependencies on
On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 02:17, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 15:32:38 -0700, kruton wrote:
> > --- "Carl D. Blake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I've been trying to install emacs21 on unstable for
> > > the last few days
> > > and aptitude keeps reporting that emacs21-bin-co
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 15:32:38 -0700, kruton wrote:
> --- "Carl D. Blake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've been trying to install emacs21 on unstable for
> > the last few days
> > and aptitude keeps reporting that emacs21-bin-common
> > package is broken.
> > I keep waiting thinking that t
On 5/8/06, Carl D. Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been trying to install emacs21 on unstable for the last few days
and aptitude keeps reporting that emacs21-bin-common package is broken.
I keep waiting thinking that the problem will be resolved, but nothing
has been done about it. aptitud
kruton wrote:
> couple of days back, when I was upgrading to v7.0.16
> of xorg, these emacs packages were "removed". i am
> hoping that the dependency issues are fixed before i
> need to use emacs again..
> --kruton
>
I had noticed that xfs-xtt has some dependency issues with xorg v7.0.16.
I ev
--- "Carl D. Blake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been trying to install emacs21 on unstable for
> the last few days
> and aptitude keeps reporting that emacs21-bin-common
> package is broken.
> I keep waiting thinking that the problem will be
> resolved, but nothing
> has been done about it.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 09:40:37AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello:
>
> TIA, while upgrading from woody to sarge emacs would not properly install.
> Error info
>
> Setting up emacs21 (21.4a-1) ...
> emacs-install emacs21
> install/auctex: Setting up for emacs21... emacs-install:
> /usr/li
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 01:13:37PM +0100, Joerg Johannes wrote:
> Hi list
>
> I have just installed emacs21 for being able to use the preview-latex
> package. I really hate this menu bar with Icons (they make me think of
> Word...).
> Can I disable this Icon menu bar, and get back to my old text
Joerg
> I have just installed emacs21 for being able to use the preview-latex
> package. I really hate this menu bar with Icons
> Can I disable this Icon menu bar, and get back to my old text-mode
I think what you are looking for is
(tool-bar-mode 0)
--
___
Shyamal Prasad writes:
> Does Emacs 21 do this consistently? Or do you get this error only the
> first time?
Consistently.
>
> I'd suggest searching the bug reports to see if it has not been
> reported. If that is the case, and you can reproduced this problem
> consistenly, it is always w
"markus" == markus hoenicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
markus> If I run vm as a mail client in Emacs 20, I have no
markus> problem accessing my pop3 and smtp servers. If I try the
markus> same in Emacs 21, I get a message:
markus> Temporary nameserver resolution problem
add dependency on dpkg (>= 1.9.0) for new install-info.
>
> But trying to install I get dependency errors. Emacs21 depends on dpkg
>>=1.9.0 and potato comes with 1.6.15. I guess nothing in emacs21
> really depends on dpkg except for maybe the install/remove scripts?
> Then I thought, okay I'll po
On Sun, 03 Mar 2002 20:31:55 -0800, Harry Putnam wrote:
>Gary Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> If you can't get an answer there, then the
>> only answer is "42"
>
>Oh, thanks, I didn't know about that list. But your reference to "42"
>sailed right over my head...
"42" is the answer; the
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 08:31:55PM -0800, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Gary Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi Harry, try here [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've seen all
> > kinds of discussions on just this type of question. Some serious emacs
> > dev types hang out there. If you can't get an answer t
Gary Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Harry, try here [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've seen all
> kinds of discussions on just this type of question. Some serious emacs
> dev types hang out there. If you can't get an answer there, then the
> only answer is "42"
Oh, thanks, I didn't know about t
On Sun, 03 Mar 2002 08:29:04 -0800, Harry Putnam wrote:
>A fairly long-time emacs user, I'm accustomed to using a site-start.el
>
>Probably good reasons for all this, I'm just curious what they are?
Hi Harry, try here [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've seen all
kinds of discussions on just this type of
On 03-Mar-2002 Harry Putnam wrote:
> A fairly long-time emacs user, I'm accustomed to using a site-start.el
> file as a place to do general things. In my single user system it can be
> quite a lot since no one else is stuck with it.
>
> Having installed the emac21 package, it seems my site-start.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 06:43:20PM +0100, Dominique Deleris wrote:
> Does anybody know when emacs21 will hit Woody?
As there's just been a low priority upload, a minimum of 10 days,
provided that the maintainer doesn't upload another version between now
and then. Even in 10 days it's not guarantee
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 11:01:00PM -0200, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
> > Built it last night, the install uses texinfo 4.0b which you can build
> > from the unstable sources, it also depends on dpkg 1.9.17 from unstable
> > which you can just build from the unstable sources again, the install
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>
>> Has anyone got Emacs21 up and running on stable?
> Built it last night, the install uses texinfo 4.0b which you can build
> from the unstable sources, it also depends on dpkg 1.9.17 from unstable
> which you can just build from the unstable sources again, the in
> Built it last night, the install uses texinfo 4.0b which you can build
> from the unstable sources, it also depends on dpkg 1.9.17 from unstable
> which you can just build from the unstable sources again, the install
> for dpkg 1.9.17 will also need debiandoc-sgml (version from stable OK)
> in
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 08:14:58AM +0100, Glyn Millington wrote:
>
> Before I do the big download. (well, on this modem it's big
> enough).
>
> Has anyone got Emacs21 up and running on stable? I was considering
> building with the source from unstable, but could just as easily get the
>
On 01 Apr 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I was delighted to find an unofficial set of debs for Emacs21, having
> drooled over screenshots for a while ! Alas the debs require something
> more than my almost virgin potato set up. Newer versions of libc6 etc.
>
> I'm quite prepared to download
33 matches
Mail list logo
