Re: e2fslibsg conflicts with e2fsprogs (hamm) | APT

1998-05-03 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Sat, 2 May 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I did an 'apt-get upgrade', and apt went ahead and removed e2fslibsg > in > favour of e2fsprogs without any messages or warnings. So now I have no > e2fslibsg, but everything seems to be fine, what will happen if I have to > reboot? Everyth

Re: e2fslibsg conflicts with e2fsprogs (hamm) | APT

1998-05-02 Thread hospedales
I did an 'apt-get upgrade', and apt went ahead and removed e2fslibsg in favour of e2fsprogs without any messages or warnings. So now I have no e2fslibsg, but everything seems to be fine, what will happen if I have to reboot? Thanks, Timothy PS, for the developers: apt-get upgrade is real

Re: e2fslibsg conflicts with e2fsprogs (hamm)

1998-05-02 Thread Torsten Hilbrich
Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dselect won't install e2fslibsg because of a conflict with > e2fsprogs, but it won't remove e2fsprogs because it is an essential > package. How do I resolve this dilemma? I did it using the --force-remove-essential flag to dpkg while removing. Make sure