Re: best way to correct (possibly) outdated information on wiki.debian.org

2019-05-18 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Sb, 18 mai 19, 19:46:07, Brian wrote: > On Sat 18 May 2019 at 20:22:54 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > I cannot find anything referring to this deprecation. Indeed, we see I meant the 'close' control command, not special address. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-refcard and search for

Re: best way to correct (possibly) outdated information on wiki.debian.org

2019-05-18 Thread Brian
On Sat 18 May 2019 at 20:22:54 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Du, 30 dec 18, 17:30:24, Andrea Borgia wrote: > > Il 30/12/18 17:09, Brian ha scritto: > > > > > > > I am unfamiliar with the bts (?) method so cannot offer advice. > > > > I suspect the isse was the empty subject line but that er

Re: best way to correct (possibly) outdated information on wiki.debian.org

2019-05-18 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Du, 30 dec 18, 17:30:24, Andrea Borgia wrote: > Il 30/12/18 17:09, Brian ha scritto: > > > > I am unfamiliar with the bts (?) method so cannot offer advice. > > I suspect the isse was the empty subject line but that error message was > a hell of a convoluted way to say so :) Just for the arc

Re: best way to correct (possibly) outdated information on wiki.debian.org

2018-12-30 Thread Andrea Borgia
Il 30/12/18 17:09, Brian ha scritto: I am unfamiliar with the bts (?) method so cannot offer advice. I suspect the isse was the empty subject line but that error message was a hell of a convoluted way to say so :) Should I write to 916733-d...@bugs.debian.org, perhaps? This is the what I

Re: best way to correct (possibly) outdated information on wiki.debian.org

2018-12-30 Thread Brian
On Sun 30 Dec 2018 at 16:54:19 +0100, Andrea Borgia wrote: > Il 30/12/18 16:23, Brian ha scritto: > > > > There is probably no need for an example file now that #889668 is closed. > > Incidentally - you opened the report, so you can close it; especially if > > you think it will save someone some

Re: best way to correct (possibly) outdated information on wiki.debian.org

2018-12-30 Thread Andrea Borgia
Il 30/12/18 16:23, Brian ha scritto: There is probably no need for an example file now that #889668 is closed. Incidentally - you opened the report, so you can close it; especially if you think it will save someone some work. Yes, that was my goal. I sent the following text to 916...@bugs.d

Re: best way to correct (possibly) outdated information on wiki.debian.org

2018-12-30 Thread Brian
On Sun 30 Dec 2018 at 16:02:17 +0100, Andrea Borgia wrote: > Il 30/12/18 15:48, Roberto C. Sánchez ha scritto: > > > > I would leave the bug report open. If it is a problem, the maintainer > > may add the example back to the package. If it was removed by upstream > > or there was some other in

Re: best way to correct (possibly) outdated information on wiki.debian.org

2018-12-30 Thread Andrea Borgia
Il 30/12/18 15:48, Roberto C. Sánchez ha scritto: I would leave the bug report open. If it is a problem, the maintainer may add the example back to the package. If it was removed by upstream or there was some other intentional reason for the removal, he is likely to comment on it and close th

Re: best way to correct (possibly) outdated information on wiki.debian.org

2018-12-30 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
Hi Andrea, On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 03:44:00PM +0100, Andrea Borgia wrote: > Hi. > > With respect to https://wiki.debian.org/SSDOptimization I see there is a > minor issue with the weekly trim suggestion: in the current testing branch, > those files are not present under /usr/share/doc/util-linux/