Re: Year 2000 compliance

1998-07-30 Thread sjc
On Wed, Jul 29, 1998 at 08:18:36AM -0700, Alexander wrote: > Hi... > > Linux has no Y2K issues aside from the BIOS. It's that simple. However, > sometime in the 2030s, it will have some time_t problems if not fixed by > then. They should be, although you will probably need to upgrade your > embedd

Re: Year 2000 compliance

1998-07-29 Thread Alexander
Hi... Linux has no Y2K issues aside from the BIOS. It's that simple. However, sometime in the 2030s, it will have some time_t problems if not fixed by then. They should be, although you will probably need to upgrade your embedded system if you want it to keep running after then. Alex On Thu, 23

Re: Year 2000 compliance

1998-07-26 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sat, Jul 25, 1998 at 09:17:51PM -0700, Alexander wrote: > Any and all UNIX systems are fully Y2K compliant, as long as the hardware I think this statement is naive. Although the kernel may represent all time values as time_t, you cannot guarantee that all applications do, and since there are ra

Re: Year 2000 compliance

1998-07-26 Thread Alexander
o: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: Year 2000 compliance > Resent-Date: 23 Jul 1998 18:04:54 - > Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ; > > *-Rick Fadler (23 Jul) > | > | Does anyone have any

Re: Year 2000 compliance

1998-07-23 Thread servis
*-Rick Fadler (23 Jul) | | Does anyone have any information on this? | http://www.debian.org/news#19980104 -- Brian Mechanical Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED] Purdue University http://www.ecn.purdue.edu/~servis -- Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubsc