On 9/7/17, Ben Finney wrote:
> Urs Thuermann writes:
>
>> I see that some new versions of packages are installed without the old
>> versions being removed, although they are marked as automatically
>> installed, e.g. Linux kernel, clang, llvm, and some others. For
>> example
>>
>> # aptitude s
Urs Thuermann writes:
> I see that some new versions of packages are installed without the old
> versions being removed, although they are marked as automatically
> installed, e.g. Linux kernel, clang, llvm, and some others. For
> example
>
> # aptitude search "~i clang"
> i clang
On 2017-09-07 17:07 +0200, Urs Thuermann wrote:
> After fully updating my jessie system using
>
> aptitude update; aptitude full-upgrade
>
> I edited sources.list to dist-upgrade to strech. A folloing aptitude
> upgrade wants to install additional 1.5 GB on my system which is
> currently
Dejan Jocic writes:
> Can you check what happens if you use apt-get update && apt-get upgrade
> followed by apt-get dist-upgrade? Aptitude is not really best tool for
> upgrades between distribution releases.
I changed to aptitude quite some time ago, because it seems to better
remove unused aut
On 07-09-17, Urs Thuermann wrote:
> After fully updating my jessie system using
>
> aptitude update; aptitude full-upgrade
>
> I edited sources.list to dist-upgrade to strech. A folloing aptitude
> upgrade wants to install additional 1.5 GB on my system which is
> currently ~5 GB, i.e. a
5 matches
Mail list logo
