Re: Unable to handle Kernel paging request

2007-07-29 Thread Brad B
Hey, thanks for the reply. I have two harddrives; one is never in the computer, and was blank. I bought it awhile ago and meant to put debian on it then, but never did. The other one has Windows XP on it, and it isn't in the computer right now. So put simply, I only have one computer, and the only

Re: Unable to handle Kernel paging request

2007-07-29 Thread Douglas Allan Tutty
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 03:56:26PM -0500, Brad B wrote: > I recently did the network installation of Debian to a spare HD, and tried > running it by itself in my PC, which usually runs windows. It boots into > grub, but I get serveral different error messages at different times. I'm > never able to

Re: Unable to handle kernel paging request...

2004-07-06 Thread Luke A. Kanies
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Thomas Adam wrote: So install 'ksymoops' and use that to run the callback trace through (I assume syslog logs it). Then look on the LKML for more detailed information. I've installed it and am trying to use it right now, but it doesn't appear to really be set up for 2.6 kernels

Re: Unable to handle kernel paging request...

2004-07-06 Thread Thomas Adam
--- "Luke A. Kanies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > at virtual address ", along with a dump of some extra info like a > Call Trace, finally ending in a Segmentation fault (I'm assuming it's > modprobe or insmod that's getting the segfault). I'm running debian > unstable. So install 'ksymoops'

Re: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address...

2002-02-12 Thread Tom Cook
Xeno Campanoli wrote: > > Thomas Cook wrote: > > > > I fixed an identical problem recently by getting new RAM - my old stuff > > had gone bad. > > > > apt-get install memtest86 > > I'm using potato, and I can't do the above command successfully. There > is something called hwtools, but the only

Re: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address...

2002-02-12 Thread Xeno Campanoli
Thomas Cook wrote: > > I fixed an identical problem recently by getting new RAM - my old stuff > had gone bad. > > apt-get install memtest86 I'm using potato, and I can't do the above command successfully. There is something called hwtools, but the only binary looks like it's for MS: inneal:~#

Re: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address...

2002-02-12 Thread Thomas Cook
I fixed an identical problem recently by getting new RAM - my old stuff had gone bad. apt-get install memtest86 Run this over your memory and see if it comes up with any errors. Be warned that it takes a while (I let mine run for an hour or so before giving up because it had topped 1000 errors).

Re: Unable to handle kernel paging request

2002-01-26 Thread Ramin Motakef
"Ralf G. R. Bergs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > H, you're making me nervous... :-( Sorry. > I can hardly believe it's a HW problem since the machine in question is a > server > machine that's running 24 hrs./day, and it's been VERY reliable so far. It's > performing it's service since s

Re: Unable to handle kernel paging request

2002-01-26 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
On 26 Jan 2002 11:52:19 +0100, Ramin Motakef wrote: [...] >> Jan 26 10:05:07 MyMachine kernel: <1>Unable to handle kernel paging request >> at virtual address 16534fc1 [...] >You should give memtest86 a try, also checking for bad blocks on the >swap partition might be a good idea. H, you're

Re: Unable to handle kernel paging request

2002-01-26 Thread Ramin Motakef
"Ralf G. R. Bergs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi there, > > since a few hours I'm getting messages like the following in my syslog. The > strange thing is that they only seem to pertain to processes doing SNMP (mrtg > and snmpget.) I don't think it's an "out of memory" issue since there is

Re: Unable to handle kernel paging

2000-02-16 Thread Dan Melomedman
No, just simply overwrite that kernel with a fresh one. Also, check your lilo.conf for any boot time options that shouldn't be there due to changed hardware e.t.c.. -- Get the truth or risk frying your brains! --> www.truthinlabeling.org <--

Re: Unable to handle kernel paging

2000-02-16 Thread dan
On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 02:56:42PM -0500, Bob Brown generated a stream of 1s and 0s: > I just received this message while booting up. I had removed an sdram chip, > ( going from 128 to 64m pc100) and turned the box on. What does this mean? > ... > VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly. >