Re: US Taxpayers: America's Army for Linux cancelled

2006-04-25 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Steve Lamb wrote: > Hal Vaughan wrote: > >>Interesting dilemma for any Quakers (or members of any "peace churches") >>who are FOSS advocates. Does one take the chance to advocate for open >>source or suggest that the entire program should be dropped? > > > Scrap the whole thing unless I'm

Re: US Taxpayers: America's Army for Linux cancelled

2006-04-25 Thread Paul Johnson
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 09:50, Steve Lamb wrote: > Scrap the whole thing unless I'm missing the "make video games" clause in > the Constitution. I tend to agree. I was only lukewarm to the game to start, got really into it, then the port was dropped. -- Paul Johnson Email and IM (XMPP & Googl

Re: US Taxpayers: America's Army for Linux cancelled

2006-04-25 Thread Steve Lamb
Hal Vaughan wrote: > Interesting dilemma for any Quakers (or members of any "peace churches") > who are FOSS advocates. Does one take the chance to advocate for open > source or suggest that the entire program should be dropped? Scrap the whole thing unless I'm missing the "make video games

Re: US Taxpayers: America's Army for Linux cancelled

2006-04-24 Thread Hal Vaughan
On Monday 24 April 2006 23:14, Paul Johnson wrote: > http://www.linuxgames.com/news/feedback.php?identiferID=8364&action=f >latview > > Write your congress critter paper letter and ask them to bring back > the Linux version or cancel America's Army for Windows, too. Interesting dilemma for any Qua

Re: US Taxpayers: America's Army for Linux cancelled

2006-04-24 Thread Ron Johnson
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 20:14 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > http://www.linuxgames.com/news/feedback.php?identiferID=8364&action=flatview > > Write your congress critter paper letter and ask them to bring back the Linux > version or cancel America's Army for Windows, too. You're smoking crack again,