Bob Proulx grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> David Guntner wrote:
>> Brian grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
Would it be possible to also pipe outgoing mail through procmail or
similar, on its way to the MTA/SMTP server?
>>> ...
>>> There is a Debian package of proxsmtp. This program can proxy
David Guntner wrote:
> Brian grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> > > Would it be possible to also pipe outgoing mail through procmail or
> > > similar, on its way to the MTA/SMTP server?
> > ...
> > There is a Debian package of proxsmtp. This program can proxy mail to a
> > local or remote MTA. More to
Brian grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> On Sun 10 Mar 2013 at 15:00:29 +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>
>> Would it be possible to also pipe outgoing mail through procmail or
>> similar, on its way to the MTA/SMTP server?
>
> When I initially looked at this I thought "maybe", but it did not seem
> p
On Sun 10 Mar 2013 at 00:37:59 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> >
> > Cool :)
> >
> > Thanks for sharing. Appreciated.
>
> +1. I also think that is pretty cool. Since Message-Id is one of the
> few that would be passed through. However many clients do not do
> this. I hav
On Sun 10 Mar 2013 at 15:00:29 +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Would it be possible to also pipe outgoing mail through procmail or
> similar, on its way to the MTA/SMTP server?
When I initially looked at this I thought "maybe", but it did not seem
particularly friendly to do. More to the point, I
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Brian wrote:
> > Fortunately, Mutt users have the opportunity to take advantage of its
> > ability to construct a custom Message-ID: header for a mail sent to
> > debian-user. Like so:
> >
> > send-hook . 'unmy_hdr Message-ID:'
> > send-hook 'debian-user@lists\.debian\.org'
On 3/10/13, Brian wrote:
> On Fri 08 Mar 2013 at 23:19:06 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
>> But I am a pedantic sort and so must say that every message does have
>
> To continue with the pedantry :) and to return to the issue raised in
> this subthread, a CC is not a duplicate of a list mail. Put them
On Fri 08 Mar 2013 at 23:19:06 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> But I am a pedantic sort and so must say that every message does have
To continue with the pedantry :) and to return to the issue raised in
this subthread, a CC is not a duplicate of a list mail. Put them side by
side and the difference is
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> In case anyone wishes to point out to Bob that this information is
> on the end of every email, it was not at the end of Bob's email, so
> give him the benefit of the doubt and spare him - please?
I know what you meant and I agree. Confusingly there are also two
Bobs in that t
On Friday 08 March 2013 16:40:50 Robert McKittrick wrote:
> Somehow, I got on the debian help list. Pleas get me (mckitt1...@gmail.com)
> off. I think my problems were due to bad sectors on my hard drive. I will
> try again when I get a new one. I have the debian 1-8 i386 iso's burned to
> dvds.
W
Somehow, I got on the debian help list. Pleas get me (mckitt1...@gmail.com)
off. I think my problems were due to bad sectors on my hard drive. I will
try again when I get a new one. I have the debian 1-8 i386 iso's burned to
dvds.
best of luck
bob
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Bob Proulx wrote
David Guntner wrote:
> Bob Proulx grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> > For one I use the mailing list headers List-Id and List-Post. Those
> > are the standard headers and those are the best ones to use for filing
> > mailing list messages. Smart MUAs use those to know how to do a
> > list-reply. T
Richard Hector grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> On 03/03/13 10:30, David Guntner wrote:
>> I've worked at places where the attitude of management was along the
>> lines of, "If you're going to come to me with a complaint about the way
>> something is being done, provide a possible solution. Otherwi
On 03/03/13 10:30, David Guntner wrote:
> Actually, I am seeking no such thing. What I *am* saying, however, is
> that if you (again, in the general sense, not necessarily specifically
> you) are going to come at someone with a "that solution is no good for
> reason X," then it's only polite to p
Brian grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> On Sat 02 Mar 2013 at 09:20:14 -0800, David Guntner wrote:
>
>> Brian grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>>
>> And face it, the scenario you describe above is not one I (or a number
>> of other people) are likely to run into all that often. Possible, sure.
>> Prob
On Sat 02 Mar 2013 at 09:20:14 -0800, David Guntner wrote:
> Brian grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> >
> > "Be strict in what you send and generous in what you receive" is still a
> > good maxim to follow.
>
> I agree. And when I'm setting up a mail *server* (which typically
> services the needs
Brian grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> On Fri 01 Mar 2013 at 00:35:35 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
>> David Guntner wrote:
>>> Anyway, the recipe is dirt simple.
>>> ...
>>> # Duplicate Suppression.
>>> :0Whc: $MAILDIR/.msgid.cache.lock
>>> | $FORMAIL -D 8192 $MAILDIR/.msgid.cache
>>>
>>> # T
On Fri 01 Mar 2013 at 00:35:35 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> David Guntner wrote:
> > Anyway, the recipe is dirt simple.
> > ...
> > # Duplicate Suppression.
> > :0Whc: $MAILDIR/.msgid.cache.lock
> > | $FORMAIL -D 8192 $MAILDIR/.msgid.cache
> >
> > # Take out the Trash.
> > :0 a:
> >
Bob Proulx grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> David Guntner wrote:
>> Anyway, the recipe is dirt simple.
>> ...
>> # Duplicate Suppression.
>> :0Whc: $MAILDIR/.msgid.cache.lock
>> | $FORMAIL -D 8192 $MAILDIR/.msgid.cache
>>
>> # Take out the Trash.
>> :0 a:
>> /dev/null
>>
>> T
Bob Proulx wrote:
David Guntner wrote:
Anyway, the recipe is dirt simple.
...
# Duplicate Suppression.
:0Whc: $MAILDIR/.msgid.cache.lock
| $FORMAIL -D 8192 $MAILDIR/.msgid.cache
# Take out the Trash.
:0 a:
/dev/null
For one I use the mailing list headers List-Id an
David Guntner wrote:
> Anyway, the recipe is dirt simple.
> ...
> # Duplicate Suppression.
> :0Whc: $MAILDIR/.msgid.cache.lock
> | $FORMAIL -D 8192 $MAILDIR/.msgid.cache
>
> # Take out the Trash.
> :0 a:
> /dev/null
>
> That's all there is to it. The formail program is us
Alois Mahdal wrote:
Hi Miles, hi everybody!
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 19:56:40 -0500
Miles Fidelman wrote:
Sure... thanks! Still, it's a good thing to train folks to
reply appropriately :-)
Holy ravioli! Training a troll? Gimme a break!
BTW, I'd prefer good old Delete key. I use it a LOT, but it
David Guntner wrote:
Miles Fidelman grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
David Guntner wrote:
If you're using Procmail to filter your E-Mail, I can send you a recipe
that deletes the duplicate when things like that happen... :-)
Anyway, the recipe is dirt simple. The bit of code below assumes that
Hi Miles, hi everybody!
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 19:56:40 -0500
Miles Fidelman wrote:
>
> Sure... thanks! Still, it's a good thing to train folks to
> reply appropriately :-)
Holy ravioli! Training a troll? Gimme a break!
BTW, I'd prefer good old Delete key. I use it a LOT, but it's
still working
Miles Fidelman grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> David Guntner wrote:
>> Miles Fidelman grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>>> AND PLEASE STOP HITTING REPLY ALL - I DON'T NEED TWO COPIES OF EVERY ONE
>>> OF YOUR POSTINGS - REPLY TO THE LIST, ONLY
>> If you're using Procmail to filter your E-Mail, I can se
David Guntner wrote:
Miles Fidelman grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
AND PLEASE STOP HITTING REPLY ALL - I DON'T NEED TWO COPIES OF EVERY ONE
OF YOUR POSTINGS - REPLY TO THE LIST, ONLY
If you're using Procmail to filter your E-Mail, I can send you a recipe
that deletes the duplicate when things li
26 matches
Mail list logo
