Re: SpamAssassin rules problems (was Re: SpamBouncer)

2002-02-09 Thread Blars Blarson
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> It only seems to catch about 60% of the spam that gets past my other >> filters. (ordb, osirusoft, blarsbl, valid rDNS of relay, valid domain >> in envelope from) (These catch about 90% of the spam, and an occasional >> valid email.) > >T

Re: SpamAssassin rules problems (was Re: SpamBouncer)

2002-02-08 Thread dman
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 12:48:55AM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: | In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | [spamassassin] | >| The default rule scoring seems pretty far off to me though. | >Can you expand on this? | | (These comments are based on the few dozen mainly spam messages

Re: SpamAssassin rules problems (was Re: SpamBouncer)

2002-02-08 Thread stan
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 12:48:55AM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > [spamassassin] > >| The default rule scoring seems pretty far off to me though. > >Can you expand on this? > > (These comments are based on the few dozen mainly spam messages