Re: Slow mailing list (41 min. for internal process)

2002-03-18 Thread timothy bauscher
> Typical !! I just got this back in minutes, guess somebody fixed > something > last night... > > Simon Hepburn wrote: > > > You are doing well, I'm getting a lag of about 3 hours here in the > UK. It > > used to take minutes. I don't think this difference can be accounted > for by > > the recent

Re: Slow mailing list (41 min. for internal process)

2002-03-18 Thread Martin Wuertele
Hi Simon! On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Simon Hepburn wrote: > You are doing well, I'm getting a lag of about 3 hours here in the UK. It > used to take minutes. I don't think this difference can be accounted for by > the recent extensive thread on racism as some have suggested. it appears that murphy i

Re: Slow mailing list (41 min. for internal process)

2002-03-18 Thread Simon Hepburn
Typical !! I just got this back in minutes, guess somebody fixed something last night... Simon Hepburn wrote: > You are doing well, I'm getting a lag of about 3 hours here in the UK. It > used to take minutes. I don't think this difference can be accounted for by > the recent extensive thread on

Re: Slow mailing list (41 min. for internal process)

2002-03-18 Thread Simon Hepburn
You are doing well, I'm getting a lag of about 3 hours here in the UK. It used to take minutes. I don't think this difference can be accounted for by the recent extensive thread on racism as some have suggested. Osamu Aoki wrote: > Mailing list is slow now. > > For example: > Delivery-date: Sun