Re: Simple HTTP Server Recommendation

2002-10-18 Thread Chris Kenrick
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 02:41:55PM +, Doug MacFarlane wrote: > > Team: > > I need to put up a simple, HTML-only site. No database/CGI/anything. > > Apache looks like overkill. > > Can you recommend a nice, compact, efficient alternative? IIRC there is a Linux kernel based webserver, whi

Re: Simple HTTP Server Recommendation

2002-10-16 Thread Mike Thompson
Boa - Small footprint, easy setup. On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 02:41:55PM +, Doug MacFarlane wrote: > Team: > > I need to put up a simple, HTML-only site. No database/CGI/anything. > > Apache looks like overkill. > > Can you recommend a nice, compact, efficient alternative? > > TIA > > ma

Re: Simple HTTP Server Recommendation

2002-10-16 Thread Jens Kubieziel
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 02:41:55PM +, Doug MacFarlane wrote: > I need to put up a simple, HTML-only site. No database/CGI/anything. > Apache looks like overkill. > Can you recommend a nice, compact, efficient alternative? Try fnord. It small, secure and very fast. You can find it on http:/

Re: Simple HTTP Server Recommendation

2002-10-16 Thread Claudio Bley
On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 16:41, Doug MacFarlane wrote: > > Team: > > I need to put up a simple, HTML-only site. No database/CGI/anything. > > Apache looks like overkill. > > Can you recommend a nice, compact, efficient alternative? I'm using thttpd. It's secure, simple to configure and its me

Re: Simple HTTP Server Recommendation

2002-10-16 Thread Jeff
Doug MacFarlane, 2002-Oct-16 14:41 +: > > Team: > > I need to put up a simple, HTML-only site. No database/CGI/anything. > > Apache looks like overkill. > > Can you recommend a nice, compact, efficient alternative? > > TIA > > madmac I use apache for HTML-only. It may be overkill, b