Remco Blaakmeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And what about the kind of transparency that is used by programs such as
> xeyes?
I believe this is not transparency, but shaped windows.
These are real "holes". They are not part of the windows, so you can't
write text on them.
"blast" is a nice dem
On Thu, 16 Apr 1998, Jonas Bofjall wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Apr 1998, Klas Lindberg wrote:
>
> > > Last I heard, transparent backgrounds were not possible (but this may or
> > > may not be true now, as I'm using X less and less...) But RxVT, which is
> >
> > Take a look at the enlightenment wm (www.e
On Tue, 14 Apr 1998, Klas Lindberg wrote:
> > Last I heard, transparent backgrounds were not possible (but this may or
> > may not be true now, as I'm using X less and less...) But RxVT, which is
>
> Take a look at the enlightenment wm (www.enlightenment.org if I'm not
> mistaken). It implements
> > Some people once told me that they saw a "xterm" window in X that had a
> >transparent -background so you could easily see the wallpaper in the back.
> Last I heard, transparent backgrounds were not possible (but this may or
> may not be true now, as I'm using X less and less...) But RxVT,
G'day,
> Some people once told me that they saw a "xterm" window in X that had a
>transparent -background so you could easily see the wallpaper in the back.
How
>is this possible? (So basically it is like me calling an xterm window and
>seeing my nice background and I will look like I am t
On Sun, Apr 12, 1998 at 12:57:00PM -0400, Carroll Kong wrote:
> Some people once told me that they saw a "xterm" window in X that had a
> transparent -background so you could easily see the wallpaper in the back.
> How
> is this possible? (So basically it is like me calling an xterm window
6 matches
Mail list logo
