Re: SPAM fiiltering - spam breakdown

2002-11-01 Thread Alvin Oga
hi david On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, David Z Maze wrote: > Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > if i was gonna tagg an email ( spam ) for later processing ... > > i might as well have spent the 1 second to check it the first > > time and hit the "D" key ... instead of looking at that email twice

Re: SPAM fiiltering - spam breakdown

2002-11-01 Thread David Z Maze
Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > if i was gonna tagg an email ( spam ) for later processing ... > i might as well have spent the 1 second to check it the first > time and hit the "D" key ... instead of looking at that email twice Does your MUA have some concept of folders? What I do is h

Re: SPAM fiiltering - spam breakdown

2002-11-01 Thread Alvin Oga
hi ya jesus On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Jesus Climent wrote: > > From my experience i would say: Do not use RBLs to reject mail, but to > tag it. a good reason against rbl's http://www.ifn.net/rblstory.htm and i agree... and i also disagree if i was gonna tagg an email ( spam ) for later