On 20141026_2314-0400, Gary Dale wrote:
> On 26/10/14 09:33 PM, Paul E Condon wrote:
> >I found today that I don't have a scsi driver on my Jessie install.
> >I search for 'scsi' in aptitude and see several competing packages.
> >Which one is most likely to enable burning a new debian netinst CD
>
On 26/10/14 09:33 PM, Paul E Condon wrote:
I found today that I don't have a scsi driver on my Jessie install.
I search for 'scsi' in aptitude and see several competing packages.
Which one is most likely to enable burning a new debian netinst CD
today or tomorrow? I need to reinstall Jessie on a
On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 08:20:08 -0700, cletusjenkins wrote:
(...)
> scsi host0: error: init_state 0x1f, warn 0xfffe, error 0x0 firmware:
> requisting advansys/mcode.bin Failed to load image "advansys/mcode.bin"
> err -2 scsi 0:0:0:0: SCSI bus reset started...
>
> The internet seems to say this is a
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 08:20:08AM -0700, cletusjenkins wrote:
> I am trying to reinstall an older machine with an Advansys SCSI host adapter
> and not having much luck. I have two of the same model adapters and both have
> the same issues. When I boot without either in the machine, it gets well
Camaleón wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:06:40 +0100, Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
>> In the latter case, which package should I report against?
> I'd say "libsane".
I think I'll go for udev. Once the scanner is attached to to a
scsi device file, then the appropriate module should be loaded
and th
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:06:40 +0100, Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
> My scanner suddenly stopped working. It is connected through firewire
> and when I turn it on, the firewire devices are created:
(...)
> My Epson scanner is thus recognized. However, the scanner is also being
> attached to a scsi de
On 2010-07-15 03:35 +0200, bri...@aracnet.com wrote:
> Looks like the latest kernel is -5, is that correct ?
Yes.
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.o
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 09:09:10 +0200
Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-07-14 04:31 +0200, bri...@aracnet.com wrote:
>
> > The question is , submit to Debian or to LKML ?
>
> Report a bug in Debian, they will likely instruct how to report
> upstream. But first of all, boot a newer kernel because your
On 2010-07-14 04:31 +0200, bri...@aracnet.com wrote:
> The question is , submit to Debian or to LKML ?
Report a bug in Debian, they will likely instruct how to report
upstream. But first of all, boot a newer kernel because your current
one…
> [24128.816259] Pid: 716, comm: scsi_eh_10 Tainted: P
Mirco Piccin put forth on 4/9/2010 6:48 PM:
> Hi, thanks for replies.
>
it's possible to manage a SCSI tape library (IBM 3581) with ISCSI?
I need to use that library attached to a server into another server...
>>>
>>> well, the aim is to share the tape library across the network..
>>> Is
Hi, thanks for replies.
>>> it's possible to manage a SCSI tape library (IBM 3581) with ISCSI?
>>> I need to use that library attached to a server into another server...
>>
>> well, the aim is to share the tape library across the network..
>> Is there a way (iscsi or other) to do the job?
> What
Mirco Piccin put forth on 4/9/2010 9:39 AM:
> Hi,
>
>> it's possible to manage a SCSI tape library (IBM 3581) with ISCSI?
>> I need to use that library attached to a server into another server...
>
> well, the aim is to share the tape library across the network..
> Is there a way (iscsi or other)
On 4/9/2010 10:39 AM, Mirco Piccin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > it's possible to manage a SCSI tape library (IBM 3581) with ISCSI?
> > I need to use that library attached to a server into another server...
>
> well, the aim is to share the tape library across the network..
> Is there a way (iscsi or other) t
Hi,
> it's possible to manage a SCSI tape library (IBM 3581) with ISCSI?
> I need to use that library attached to a server into another server...
well, the aim is to share the tape library across the network..
Is there a way (iscsi or other) to do the job?
Regards
M
Stephen Powell wrote, on 25/03/10 02:47:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:05:13 -0400 (EDT), Arthur Marsh wrote:
Why shouldn't the eata driver be loaded once the PCI bus has been
scanned and a device that the eata driver knows about [1044:a400] in
this case is detected?
00:08.0 SCSI storage controller
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:05:13 -0400 (EDT), Arthur Marsh wrote:
> Why shouldn't the eata driver be loaded once the PCI bus has been
> scanned and a device that the eata driver knows about [1044:a400] in
> this case is detected?
>
> 00:08.0 SCSI storage controller [0100]: Adaptec (formerly DPT)
>
Stephen Powell wrote, on 24/03/10 01:29:
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 04:56:05 -0400 (EDT), Arthur Marsh wrote:
Stephen Powell wrote, on 2010-03-23 00:50:
OK, there are a couple of things to check. First of all, make sure
you have MODULES=most listed in /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf.
grep -v \#
Stephen Powell wrote, on 2010-03-24 01:29:
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 04:56:05 -0400 (EDT), Arthur Marsh wrote:
Stephen Powell wrote, on 2010-03-23 00:50:
OK, there are a couple of things to check. First of all, make sure
you have MODULES=most listed in /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf.
grep -v \
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 04:56:05 -0400 (EDT), Arthur Marsh wrote:
> Stephen Powell wrote, on 2010-03-23 00:50:
>>
>> OK, there are a couple of things to check. First of all, make sure
>> you have MODULES=most listed in /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf.
>
> grep -v \# /etc/initramfs-tools/initramf
Stephen Powell wrote, on 2010-03-23 00:50:
OK, there are a couple of things to check. First of all, make sure
you have MODULES=most listed in /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf.
grep -v \# /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf|uniq
MODULES=most
BUSYBOX=y
KEYMAP=n
BOOT=local
DEVICE=eth0
N
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 07:50:57 -0400 (EDT), Arthur Marsh wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 07:28:24 -0400 (EDT), Stephen Powell wrote:
>> On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:25:45 -0400 (EDT), Arthur Marsh wrote:
>>> Hi, I have a DPT 2044W SCSI adaptor in this pc for a non-boot disk ...
>> So what's the problem?
>
>
Stephen Powell wrote, on 21/03/10 21:58:
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:25:45 -0400 (EDT), Arthur Marsh wrote:
Hi, I have a DPT 2044W SCSI adaptor in this pc for a non-boot disk ...
Your post is quite long; and after reading it twice, I still don't
understand exactly what your question is or what prob
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:25:45 -0400 (EDT), Arthur Marsh wrote:
> Hi, I have a DPT 2044W SCSI adaptor in this pc for a non-boot disk ...
Your post is quite long; and after reading it twice, I still don't
understand exactly what your question is or what problem you are
trying to solve. I would norm
Bhasker C V writes:
> The native driver can directly do all the tasks and SCSI emulation
> is not needed anymore.
>
> For programs like growisofs, cdrecord in the option dev=
> instead of giving 0,0,0 etc., you can give /dev/hdc directly.
Thank you. That is great news. I figured it was
Hi,
The native driver can directly do all the tasks and SCSI emulation
is not needed anymore.
For programs like growisofs, cdrecord in the option dev=
instead of giving 0,0,0 etc., you can give /dev/hdc directly.
On Tue, 5 May 2009, Martin McCormick wrote:
I upgraded my kernel from an old
Paul Johnson wrote:
I have a Firewire external hard drive, and recently with the upgrade
to linux-image-2.6.22, my firewire block device has been detecting as
sda instead of sdc, causing my machine to hang at boot if it is turned
on. What can be done to resolve the detection order?
This is e
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 11:44:47AM +1200, Greg Trounson wrote:
> Kevin Mark wrote:
> >On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:45:28AM +1200, Greg Trounson wrote:
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>Is there a way to rebuild the initrd to tell it to load sata drivers
> >>first, or some flag to pass to the kernel to force the f
Kevin Mark wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:45:28AM +1200, Greg Trounson wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way to rebuild the initrd to tell it to load sata drivers first,
or some flag to pass to the kernel to force the first hard disk to sda?
instead of using /dev/sda or /dev/sde use UUID notation
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:45:28AM +1200, Greg Trounson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there a way to rebuild the initrd to tell it to load sata drivers first,
> or some flag to pass to the kernel to force the first hard disk to sda?
>
instead of using /dev/sda or /dev/sde use UUID notation.
--
| .''`
On Mon, Dec 25, 2006 at 11:06:26PM -0300, Alejandro wrote:
> People, I have a Debian PC with a hard disk with the following features:
> IDE interface
> ide: 1
> description: IDE interface
> product: 82801FB/FW (ICH6/ICH6W) SATA controller
This is a Serial ATA interface, not IDE.
> Disk:
> desc
On (14/04/06 23:32), Christopher Nelson wrote:
> >
> > Regarding the "Could not find USB device", run it as root.
>
> And if that works, add yourself to the 'camera' group rather than
> continuing to run it as root everytime you want it.
>
Thankyou, this works also.
James.
--
James Westby
On (14/04/06 23:44), Ron Johnson wrote:
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> From: Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 23:44:11 -0500
> Subject: Re: SCSI emulation of USB camera
>
> On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 02:45 +0100, James Westby wrote:
> > On
> Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:58:13 +0930
> > > Subject: Re: SCSI emulation of USB camera
> > > Mail-Followup-To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 05:42:52PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 21:52 +0100
On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 02:45 +0100, James Westby wrote:
> On (15/04/06 10:58), David Purton wrote:
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > From: David Purton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:58:13 +0930
> > Subject: Re: SCSI emulation of USB ca
On (15/04/06 10:58), David Purton wrote:
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> From: David Purton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:58:13 +0930
> Subject: Re: SCSI emulation of USB camera
> Mail-Followup-To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>
> On Fri, Apr 1
On (15/04/06 11:24), John O'Hagan wrote:
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> From: John O'Hagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 11:24:50 +1000
> Subject: Re: SCSI emulation of USB camera
>
> On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 06:52 am, James Westby wrote:
>
&g
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 05:42:52PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 21:52 +0100, James Westby wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am trying to get my Canon S1 IS to work under Debian. I am running a
> > mixed testing/unstable system (mostly testing, except for libc6,
> > X.org, udev and
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 06:52 am, James Westby wrote:
>
> I tried writing a udev rule for the camera
>
> BUS="usb", SYSFS{vendor}="Canon Inc.", SYSFS{product}="Canon Digital
> Camera", NAME="camera%n"
>
> but this has no effect. I have neither /dev/sd* nor /dev/camera* with
> or without this rule.
>
I
On (14/04/06 18:52), Ron Johnson wrote:
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> From: Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 18:52:17 -0500
> Subject: Re: SCSI emulation of USB camera
>
[snip]
>
> Hmmm. Which version of libusb-0.1-4, usbutils &
3.1.1
> > X-Spam-Level:
> > Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 17:42:52 -0500
> > Subject: Re: SCSI emulation of USB camera
> >
> > On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 21:52 +0100, James Westby wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I am trying to get my Canon S1 IS to wor
On (14/04/06 17:42), Ron Johnson wrote:
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> From: Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=7.0 tests=none autolearn=ham
> version=3.1.1
> X-Spam-Level:
> Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 17:42:52 -0500
> Sub
On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 21:52 +0100, James Westby wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to get my Canon S1 IS to work under Debian. I am running a
> mixed testing/unstable system (mostly testing, except for libc6,
> X.org, udev and linux-image and their dependencies).
>
[snip]
> snd_page_alloc
On Thursday 30 March 2006 08:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hello, have a sun workstation and decided to install debian etch on it,
> everything goes fine, i installed 2 different kernels
> linux-kernel-2.6.15-1-k7-smp and linux-kernel-2.6.15-1-686-smp, when
> any of that kernel boots it hangs up s
Hi,
On Monday 12 December 2005 23:28, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> But there is an alternative: compile the host-adapter with the rootfs disk
> _into_ the kernel. This way, it will always be the first host adapter.
> Then, compile the other host adapter driver as module. udev or hotplug will
> automat
Gebhardt Thomas wrote:
> On Monday 12 December 2005 14:52, L.V.Gandhi wrote:
>> There is a work out with udev See the article in
>> http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/126.
>> same principle can be applied for your USB hard drive.
> (should probably read
> ... can be applied for your SC
Hi,
On Monday 12 December 2005 14:52, L.V.Gandhi wrote:
> There is a work out with udev See the article in
> http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/126.
> same principle can be applied for your USB hard drive.
(should probably read
... can be applied for your SCSI hard drive)
Sorry, I fo
On 12/12/05, Gebhardt Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can someone please give me a hint/a pointer to docs
> on how to solve the following problem:
>
> A server has both an internal and an external raid controler
> (scsi driver gdth and aic7xxx, respectively). Unfortunately
> the externa
Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 26 November 2005 16:39, Ralph Alvy wrote:
>>Using Debian Testing. I find that the kernel keeps kicking out SCSI
>> phase change messages, filling my log full of them all the time. They
>> look like this:
>>
>>Nov 26 13:31:09 debian kernel: sd [...] phase change 6-
On Saturday 26 November 2005 16:39, Ralph Alvy wrote:
>Using Debian Testing. I find that the kernel keeps kicking out SCSI
> phase change messages, filling my log full of them all the time. They
> look like this:
>
>Nov 26 13:31:09 debian kernel: sd [...] phase change 6-7 [...]
>
>Also, during the
I have exactly the same problem. My kernel is
2.6.8-2-386 the one that comes
with the distribution. I also can not find
documentation on how to deal with
USB storage in kernels 2.6.*. The same happened me
with the audio ( I have an
old ISA soundblaster on a pentium II system, that
debian didn't det
On Friday 12 November 2004 12:21 pm, Greg Madden wrote:
> On Friday 12 November 2004 07:26 am, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> > I used the sarge debian-installer to install with a 2.6 kernel. My
> > My ISA adaptec scsi2 card was not found, of course, but I can't find
> > any adaptec drivers in the
On Friday 12 November 2004 07:26 am, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> I used the sarge debian-installer to install with a 2.6 kernel. My
> My ISA adaptec scsi2 card was not found, of course, but I can't find
> any adaptec drivers in the distribution, my superdisk is recognized
> twice, and my ISA cdr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 07:10:53AM -0500, Tim Kelley wrote:
On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 12:01:43AM +0100, Joao Clemente wrote:
Which are the tradeoffs of hard vs software raid1? What happens/How do
we proceed if 1 disk fails (how do we know it, how do we replace/resync
them?)
S
On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 07:10:53AM -0500, Tim Kelley wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 12:01:43AM +0100, Joao Clemente wrote:
> > Which are the tradeoffs of hard vs software raid1? What happens/How do
> > we proceed if 1 disk fails (how do we know it, how do we replace/resync
> > them?)
>
> Softwar
On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 00:49 +0800, Paolo Alexis Falcone wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 15:22:17 +0100, Frank Gevaerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 09:28:32AM +0800, Paolo Alexis Falcone wrote:
[snip]
> On an environment that's heavy on writes, RAID 5's overhead doesn't
> real
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 15:22:17 +0100, Frank Gevaerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 09:28:32AM +0800, Paolo Alexis Falcone wrote:
> > RAID 5 alleviates this by using parity information stored across the
> > disks - now it takes more than 1 disk failure for RAID 5 to fail.
>
> Ho
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 09:28:32AM +0800, Paolo Alexis Falcone wrote:
>
> Here's the case here - RAID 1 indeed does not mirror physical disk
> errors (else there's no real point in using RAID at all). However,
> should there be errors in the disks during reconstruction of the RAID
> array, RAID 1
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 15:31:03 +, Joao Clemente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Paolo, Alvin, Pigeon, Ron & Tim, thanks for all the replies...
>
> Paolo Alexis Falcone wrote:
>
> [snip]
> >>Which are the tradeoffs of hard vs software raid1? What happens/How do
> >>we proceed if 1 disk fails (ho
On Oct 30 2004, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Sat, 2004-10-30 at 00:33 -0700, Alvin Oga wrote:
> but people still think usb hd is what they want geez...
> ( it's their $$$ for time and hw )
That's why I voted with my $$$ for a firewire enclosure
That's what I did also: motivated by the good performanc
> >you could try higher RAID levels (RAID 5) for data integrity. RAID 1
> >will only mirror disks - and that would also mean should there be
> >errors in one disk it gets propagated to the mirror as well.
Indeed this is false. It also shows a complete lack of understanding the
very basic principl
Hi Paolo, Alvin, Pigeon, Ron & Tim, thanks for all the replies...
Paolo Alexis Falcone wrote:
[snip]
Which are the tradeoffs of hard vs software raid1? What happens/How do
we proceed if 1 disk fails (how do we know it, how do we replace/resync
them?)
[snip]
Do note though that RAID 1 won't help yo
On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 12:01:43AM +0100, Joao Clemente wrote:
> Hi.
> For the first time I'm gonna setup a server with SCSI disks (until now
> I've done it only with IDE - regular ATA or SATA)
>
> I'm getting a completly new server (P4 3Ghz, Dual-Channel DDR 400, MB
> with intel chipset) and, w
>
> hi ya
>
> On Sat, 30 Oct 2004, Joao Clemente wrote:
>
> > I'm getting a completly new server (P4 3Ghz, Dual-Channel DDR 400, MB
> > with intel chipset) and, while I have a good ideia on these components,
> > I would like to setup a RAID-1 system with SCSI disks...
>
> there is zero point ot se
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > and hopefully "security" is a non issue, when one is allowing usb
> > disks to be plugged in at any time
>
> That's goes for any external JBOD drive.
lot harder to hide a disk ... in ones shirt pocket and walk out :-)
- cell phones with camer
On Sat, 2004-10-30 at 00:33 -0700, Alvin Oga wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Oct 2004, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> > > i think firewire had its day and its dying ... usb is taking over
> >
> > Blech. USB2 HDDs are *SLOW*.
>
> yup... almost as fast as floppies .. :-)
>
> but people still think usb hd is what th
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > i think firewire had its day and its dying ... usb is taking over
>
> Blech. USB2 HDDs are *SLOW*.
yup... almost as fast as floppies .. :-)
but people still think usb hd is what they want geez...
( it's their $$$ for time and hw )
and hopefull
On Sat, 2004-10-30 at 00:18 -0700, Alvin Oga wrote:
> hi ya ron
>
> On Sat, 30 Oct 2004, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
[snip]
> > FireWire800 will be a big step in the right direction, since I
> > can already get 1/2 of IDE speeds with my FW400 drive (an "old"
> > Maxtor 60GB drive).
>
> i think firewire
hi ya ron
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Sounds like user error to me.
yes... and/or more likely, initial system config errors ..
> Never said I was the expert. Our SysAdmins are the experts.
:-)
> And they have to swap drives out of running systems on a reasonably
> frequent b
On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 21:25 -0700, Alvin Oga wrote:
> hi ya ron
>
> On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> > I've been using h/w RAID for 10 years, in everything from 60GB
> > (using scads of 4GB devices) to 15TB SANs using 147GB devices,
> > and have *never* *ever* seen what you suggest.
>
hi ya ron
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Ron Johnson wrote:
> I've been using h/w RAID for 10 years, in everything from 60GB
> (using scads of 4GB devices) to 15TB SANs using 147GB devices,
> and have *never* *ever* seen what you suggest.
>
> I would, literally, fall over dead if I ever saw that happen
On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 16:48 -0700, Alvin Oga wrote:
> hi ya
>
> On Sat, 30 Oct 2004, Joao Clemente wrote:
>
[snip]
> problem with raid1 ( aka mirror )
> - if one disk goes bad, the other disk will copy that bad info
> onto the good disk the whole point of mirror, both disk
>
On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 12:01:43AM +0100, Joao Clemente wrote:
> Hi.
> For the first time I'm gonna setup a server with SCSI disks (until now
> I've done it only with IDE - regular ATA or SATA)
>
> I'm getting a completly new server (P4 3Ghz, Dual-Channel DDR 400, MB
> with intel chipset) and, w
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 00:01:43 +0100, Joao Clemente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
> For the first time I'm gonna setup a server with SCSI disks (until now
> I've done it only with IDE - regular ATA or SATA)
>
> I'm getting a completly new server (P4 3Ghz, Dual-Channel DDR 400, MB
> with intel chi
hi ya
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004, Joao Clemente wrote:
>
> ?!? What if a drive fails while on those 12h/day where people are
> actually using them? This will be a fileserver where documents are
> constantly changed/added/removed during the work hours!
have 2 file servers ...
- your fans is more l
Hi Alvin, thanks for the quick reply. Some comments and questions, tough:
Alvin Oga wrote:
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004, Joao Clemente wrote:
I'm getting a completly new server (P4 3Ghz, Dual-Channel DDR 400, MB
with intel chipset) and, while I have a good ideia on these components,
I would like to setup
hi ya
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004, Joao Clemente wrote:
> I'm getting a completly new server (P4 3Ghz, Dual-Channel DDR 400, MB
> with intel chipset) and, while I have a good ideia on these components,
> I would like to setup a RAID-1 system with SCSI disks...
there is zero point ot setting up raid-1
steef van duin wrote:
Katipo wrote:
steef van duin wrote:
hi david, down here what I did before, but cdrecord does not react on
dev=1,0,0 (the aopen com4824 is the burner), so it seems i am stuck
any further suggestions?
thanks in advance,
regards,
steef
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cdrecord dev=ATAPI -sc
Katipo wrote:
steef van duin wrote:
hi david, down here what I did before, but cdrecord does not react on
dev=1,0,0 (the aopen com4824 is the burner), so it seems i am stuck
any further suggestions?
thanks in advance,
regards,
steef
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cdrecord dev=ATAPI -scanbus
Cdrecord-Clone 2
steef van duin wrote:
hi david, down here what I did before, but cdrecord does not react on
dev=1,0,0 (the aopen com4824 is the burner), so it seems i am stuck
any further suggestions?
thanks in advance,
regards,
steef
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cdrecord dev=ATAPI -scanbus
Cdrecord-Clone 2.01a27 (i686-p
Katipo wrote:
steef van duin wrote:
...it does not seem to be possible to download the man page
on grub for unstable (sarge) so i repeat my question:
i want to use scsi-emulation under unstable. sg and scsi emulation
modules loaded automatically. i am using kernel 2.4. like to work
fro
steef van duin wrote:
...it does not seem to be possible to download the man page on
grub for unstable (sarge) so i repeat my question:
i want to use scsi-emulation under unstable. sg and scsi emulation
modules loaded automatically. i am using kernel 2.4. like to work
from the concole,
steef van duin wrote:
Adam Aube wrote:
steef van duin wrote:
how do i get cdrecord to recognize my cd-writer under sarge?
What kernel - 2.4 or 2.6?
cdrecord dev=ATAPI recognizes my cdrom but not the writer.
scsi-emulation and sg are (automatically) installed as modprobe tells
me. guess i
Adam Aube wrote:
steef van duin wrote:
how do i get cdrecord to recognize my cd-writer under sarge?
What kernel - 2.4 or 2.6?
cdrecord dev=ATAPI recognizes my cdrom but not the writer.
scsi-emulation and sg are (automatically) installed as modprobe tells
me. guess i must grub tell someth
steef van duin wrote:
> how do i get cdrecord to recognize my cd-writer under sarge?
What kernel - 2.4 or 2.6?
> cdrecord dev=ATAPI recognizes my cdrom but not the writer.
> scsi-emulation and sg are (automatically) installed as modprobe tells
> me. guess i must grub tell something. lilo did not
On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 23:21, Joachim Förster wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> Is there a possibility to spin down a SCSI harddisk? hdparm -Y does not
> work on SCSI disks. I tried noflushd - but its the same. It says, one
> would have to use a kernel patch
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 12:19:52PM +1100, Campbell McLeay wrote:
>
> I am not really sure who to mail regarding this error.
You might want to report a bug, including the kernel panic exact text,
to the kernel package you are running. Probably kernel-image-Something.
--
"If you have an apple
Andreas Janssen wrote:
Hello
Gustavo Halperin (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
I'm using 'Grip' in order to encode cd music to mp3. The problem is
that I can do it only with the root user. With other user I get
problems with SCSI Device.
I'm using SCSI simulator. The '/dev/cdrom' is a soft
Hello
Gustavo Halperin (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I'm using 'Grip' in order to encode cd music to mp3. The problem is
> that I can do it only with the root user. With other user I get
> problems with SCSI Device.
> I'm using SCSI simulator. The '/dev/cdrom' is a soft link to
> '/dev/scd0'
On Saturday 17 January 2004 08:52 am, Thomas Sommer wrote:
> Am Sat, 17 Jan 2004 03:20:10 +0100 schrieb Roberto Sanchez:
>
> > Thomas Sommer wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> after reading a lot of howtos, newsgroups, etc. i constandly have the
> >> following problem with my cdrw-drive (when i try to mou
Am Sat, 17 Jan 2004 03:20:10 +0100 schrieb Roberto Sanchez:
> Thomas Sommer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> after reading a lot of howtos, newsgroups, etc. i constandly have the
>> following problem with my cdrw-drive (when i try to mount it):
>>
>> dusk:/# mount /dev/cdrw
>> mount: /dev/scd0 ist kein gülti
Am Sat, 17 Jan 2004 04:00:06 +0100 schrieb Alvin Oga:
>
>
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Thomas Sommer wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> after reading a lot of howtos, newsgroups, etc. i constandly have the
>> following problem with my cdrw-drive (when i try to mount it):
>>
>> dusk:/# mount /dev/cdrw
>> mount:
Am Sat, 17 Jan 2004 04:00:10 +0100 schrieb Kevin Mark:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 02:05:36AM +, Thomas Sommer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> after reading a lot of howtos, newsgroups, etc. i constandly have the
>> following problem with my cdrw-drive (when i try to mount it):
>>
>> dusk:/# mount /dev/cd
Am Sat, 17 Jan 2004 08:10:06 +0100 schrieb Andreas Janssen:
> Hello
>
> Thomas Sommer (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
>
>> after reading a lot of howtos, newsgroups, etc. i constandly have the
>> following problem with my cdrw-drive (when i try to mount it):
>>
>> dusk:/# mount /dev/cdrw
>> mount:
Hello
Thomas Sommer (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> after reading a lot of howtos, newsgroups, etc. i constandly have the
> following problem with my cdrw-drive (when i try to mount it):
>
> dusk:/# mount /dev/cdrw
> mount: /dev/scd0 ist kein gültiges blockorientiertes Gerät
> (english: is not a
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 02:05:36AM +, Thomas Sommer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after reading a lot of howtos, newsgroups, etc. i constandly have the
> following problem with my cdrw-drive (when i try to mount it):
>
> dusk:/# mount /dev/cdrw
> mount: /dev/scd0 ist kein gültiges blockorientiertes Gerät
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Thomas Sommer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after reading a lot of howtos, newsgroups, etc. i constandly have the
> following problem with my cdrw-drive (when i try to mount it):
>
> dusk:/# mount /dev/cdrw
> mount: /dev/scd0 ist kein gültiges blockorientiertes Gerät
> (english: is not
Thomas Sommer wrote:
Hi,
after reading a lot of howtos, newsgroups, etc. i constandly have the
following problem with my cdrw-drive (when i try to mount it):
dusk:/# mount /dev/cdrw
mount: /dev/scd0 ist kein gültiges blockorientiertes Gerät
(english: is not a valid block device)
scsi-ide-module is
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 07:35:01PM -0500, Andrew Vallon wrote:
> Has anybody installed and got to work an Adaptec SCSI model 29160 card
> with Debian kernel_2.4.18?
> The card says it will work under 'Linux' however...
> I need an ultra wide card to work with an Sony AIT drive that I have.
>
Gregory K. Johnson a écrit :
I got an error much like this a few days ago while updating my kernel.
I stayed up late looking into and found:
* It's a known bug, #213663.[1]
* The changelog for the upstream 2.4.23-rc2 kernel release says:
"Fix ide-scsi initialization lockup (kudos to Alan)
marcos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Lucas Bergman a écrit :
>
>>This could be a bug in your drive or in the ide-scsi kernel module.
>>If no one else chimes in with clever ideas, then this may be a
>>question for the Linux (kernel) hackers. [Ominous music begins
>>playing in the background.]
>>
1 - 100 of 488 matches
Mail list logo
