On Lu, 09 apr 12, 15:52:30, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> Learning is good! I am fully supportive of gaining experience with
> different configurations.
>
> In this case a configuration which might be more generally useful
> would be a router configuration. Instead of bridging (or bonding)
> different
>
> Seyyed Mohtadin Hashemi wrote:
>
> Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> > Is there some reason that you are choosing not to use a switch that
>
> > you haven't told us about?
>
>
>
> I have no reason other than I'm trying different network configurations to
>
> learn how to do different things. I already have
Seyyed Mohtadin Hashemi wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Is there some reason that you are choosing not to use a switch that
> > you haven't told us about?
>
> I have no reason other than I'm trying different network configurations to
> learn how to do different things. I already have established a
Seyyed Mohtadin Hashemi wrote:
> I have a question though: The server is connected to the internet via eth0
> (it gets IP from external DHCP server), will i be able to connect to the
> br0 from the eth0?
Yes. You didn't show that part of your configuration. I expect it
will have a default gatewa
To clarify what i want: I want to setup the connection so that server is
able to "speak" to both desktops (and vice versa) AND the desktops should
be able to "speak" with each other.
You may be right that it is a bridge i need, i'm not that experienced in
setting up networks. I will try the bridg
5 matches
Mail list logo
