Le 26.11.2012 01:56, Zenaan Harkness a écrit :
On 11/26/12, Neal Murphy wrote:
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 12:54:33 PM Ralf Mardorf wrote:
... My humour is less good than Chaplin's ...
OK. Pointed, direct humor back at you. What was the shortest book
ever
published? "One Thousand Year
On 11/26/12, Neal Murphy wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 12:54:33 PM Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> ... My humour is less good than Chaplin's ...
>
> OK. Pointed, direct humor back at you. What was the shortest book ever
> published? "One Thousand Years of German Humor", which consisted of the
>
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 12:54:33 PM Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> ... My humour is less good than Chaplin's ...
OK. Pointed, direct humor back at you. What was the shortest book ever
published? "One Thousand Years of German Humor", which consisted of the
frontispiece, the preface, and the introd
On Mi, 21 nov 12, 14:40:58, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>
> Obviously, Debian is working so well, for everybody, that we need
> something to keep the list from becoming dead air :-)
It happens during the freeze.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://li
Le 22.11.2012 22:07, Beco a écrit :
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 7:28 PM, François TOURDE
wrote:
Le 15665ième jour après Epoch,
Lisi Reisz écrivait:
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 16:55:22 Beco wrote:
Use of smiley face should point this was just a joke. As we can
see in
this first use in 1982:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 7:28 PM, François TOURDE wrote:
> Le 15665ième jour après Epoch,
> Lisi Reisz écrivait:
>
>> On Wednesday 21 November 2012 16:55:22 Beco wrote:
>>> Use of smiley face should point this was just a joke. As we can see in
>>> this first use in 1982:
>>
>> That is what is so ve
Le Mer 21 novembre 2012 19:12, Brad Rogers a écrit :
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 18:41:08 +0100
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
>
> Hello Ralf,
>
>
>> I'm not sure, if it's really just the language barrier. Coarse humour
>>
>
> I picked up your intent, but clearly others didn't. At least one other
> person inv
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 00:11:08 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 23:28 +0100, François TOURDE wrote:
> > Le 15665ième jour après Epoch,
> > Lisi Reisz écrivait:
> >
> > > On Wednesday 21 November 2012 16:55:22 Beco wrote:
> > >> Use of smiley face should point this was just a joke.
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 23:28 +0100, François TOURDE wrote:
> Le 15665ième jour après Epoch,
> Lisi Reisz écrivait:
>
> > On Wednesday 21 November 2012 16:55:22 Beco wrote:
> >> Use of smiley face should point this was just a joke. As we can see in
> >> this first use in 1982:
> >
> > That is what i
Le 15665ième jour après Epoch,
Lisi Reisz écrivait:
> On Wednesday 21 November 2012 16:55:22 Beco wrote:
>> Use of smiley face should point this was just a joke. As we can see in
>> this first use in 1982:
>
> That is what is so very offensive. He thinks that being so rude about just
> over half
Florian Snow wrote:
Ok, I understand that you were offended by Ralf's original "joke", but
is it really necessary to make an already heated debate worse by
making statements like yours? Ralf already explained that he actually
meant to apologize and didn't ask for an apology and others already
Lisi Reisz :
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 17:13:18 Brad Rogers wrote:
"Apologize!" means you're demanding an apology from someone else.
He probably is!
Ok, I understand that you were offended by Ralf's original "joke", but
is it really necessary to make an already heated debate worse by ma
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 16:00 -0300, Beco wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 November 2012 16:55:22 Beco wrote:
> >> Use of smiley face should point this was just a joke. As we can see in
> >> this first use in 1982:
> >
> > That is what is so very offens
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 November 2012 16:55:22 Beco wrote:
>> Use of smiley face should point this was just a joke. As we can see in
>> this first use in 1982:
>
> That is what is so very offensive. He thinks that being so rude about just
> over half o
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 18:12 +, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 18:41:08 +0100
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> Hello Ralf,
>
> >I'm not sure, if it's really just the language barrier. Coarse humour
>
> I picked up your intent, but clearly others didn't. At least one other
> person involv
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 18:41:08 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Hello Ralf,
>I'm not sure, if it's really just the language barrier. Coarse humour
I picked up your intent, but clearly others didn't. At least one other
person involved in this rigmarole is not a native English speaker. As
such, it's ess
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 17:46 +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 November 2012 16:55:22 Beco wrote:
> > Use of smiley face should point this was just a joke. As we can see in
> > this first use in 1982:
>
> That is what is so very offensive. He thinks that being so rude about just
> over h
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 17:13:18 Brad Rogers wrote:
> >Since I'm kill-filed you can't read it any more. Apologize! But I
>
> You should say either "I apologise" or "My apologies".
>
> "Apologize!" means you're demanding an apology from someone else.
He probably is!
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 16:55:22 Beco wrote:
> Use of smiley face should point this was just a joke. As we can see in
> this first use in 1982:
That is what is so very offensive. He thinks that being so rude about just
over half of the population is _funny_. As apparently do you.
Lisi
-
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 17:13 +, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:47:20 +0100
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> Hello Ralf,
>
> >Since I'm kill-filed you can't read it any more. Apologize! But I
>
> You should say either "I apologise" or "My apologies".
>
> "Apologize!" means you're deman
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:47:20 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Hello Ralf,
>Since I'm kill-filed you can't read it any more. Apologize! But I
You should say either "I apologise" or "My apologies".
"Apologize!" means you're demanding an apology from someone else.
--
Regards _
/ )
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 16:34 +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>> On Wednesday 21 November 2012 15:51:24 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> > Or a woman. I hope this isn't too sexist.
>>
>> It is, extremely. My husband says do you not think a woman is humanum as
>
Lisi Reisz:
> On Wednesday 21 November 2012 15:51:24 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> Or a woman. I hope this isn't too sexist.
>
> It is, extremely. My husband says do you not think a woman is humanum as
> well?
I think you got Ralf wrong. He did not want to express that women are
not human but "to make
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 16:34 +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 November 2012 15:51:24 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > Or a woman. I hope this isn't too sexist.
>
> It is, extremely. My husband says do you not think a woman is humanum as
> well?
>
> I'm going to protect myself from you by kill-f
24 matches
Mail list logo
