Re: OT: UML (Re: UML Modeling w/o Rational Rose)

2002-06-04 Thread prover
From: "Leandro GuimarĂ£es Faria Corsetti Dutra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Oleg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Debian Users" Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:02 AM Subject: Re: OT: UML (Re: UML Modeling w/o Rational Rose) > Oleg escreveu: > > > > What

Re: OT: UML (Re: UML Modeling w/o Rational Rose)

2002-06-04 Thread Leandro GuimarĂ£es Faria Corsetti Dutra
Oleg escreveu: What do you get from UML, that you don't get from class definitions (in header files) ? UML has a much bigger scope, since it tries to account for all the design phase, including data modelling. Unfortunately it's a fundamentally flawed approach, as shown in http://dbdebu

Re: OT: UML (Re: UML Modeling w/o Rational Rose)

2002-06-03 Thread Tommi Komulainen
On 2002-06-03 14:22 +, Oleg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 03 June 2002 02:01 pm, Tommi Komulainen wrote: > > > On the topic of free UML modeling software, I've tried ArgoUML and > > Poseidon, but unfortunately they aren't quite comparable to Rose. Are > > there some other UML tools I