Re: No aptitude download.

2013-02-10 Thread Weaver
On Sun, February 10, 2013 2:27 am, Weaver wrote: > > On Sun, February 10, 2013 1:51 am, Weaver wrote: >> >> On Sat, February 9, 2013 8:44 pm, Chris Bannister wrote: >>> On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 04:58:48AM -0800, Weaver wrote: I now have the original number of packages reinstalled and only

Re: No aptitude download.

2013-02-10 Thread Weaver
On Sun, February 10, 2013 1:51 am, Weaver wrote: > > On Sat, February 9, 2013 8:44 pm, Chris Bannister wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 04:58:48AM -0800, Weaver wrote: >>> >>> I now have the original number of packages reinstalled and only 35845 >>> new >>> packages to look through to find out wh

Re: No aptitude download.

2013-02-10 Thread Weaver
On Sat, February 9, 2013 8:44 pm, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 04:58:48AM -0800, Weaver wrote: >> >> I now have the original number of packages reinstalled and only 35845 >> new >> packages to look through to find out what I am missing. >> >> I think I'll just call it a night.

Re: No aptitude download.

2013-02-09 Thread Chris Bannister
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 04:58:48AM -0800, Weaver wrote: > > I now have the original number of packages reinstalled and only 35845 new > packages to look through to find out what I am missing. > > I think I'll just call it a night. What is the output from apt-get update, and apt-get upgrade, wrap

Re: No aptitude download.

2013-02-09 Thread Weaver
On Sat, February 9, 2013 4:53 am, Weaver wrote: > > On Sat, February 9, 2013 4:15 am, Weaver wrote: >> Greetings all. >> >> I can't seem to access the mirror and get a reading during the download >> of >> "Connection failed [IP: 202.158.214.106 80]" >> I only have 114 apps in `Installed' and the o

Re: No aptitude download.

2013-02-09 Thread Weaver
On Sat, February 9, 2013 4:15 am, Weaver wrote: > Greetings all. > > I can't seem to access the mirror and get a reading during the download of > "Connection failed [IP: 202.158.214.106 80]" > I only have 114 apps in `Installed' and the other 2000 odd have been > dumped in `Obsolete'. > > Is there