Must have been a pre-release then. The Slackware 3.5 CD has v2.0 and v2.1
directories, and
he was about to install the latest 2.1, until I explained that 2.1 series are
developmental,
so he went to the 2.0 directory and installed the newest one in there, which
was a 2.0.35,
because I told him it
On Fri, Jul 03, 1998 at 12:42:52AM -0700, Christopher Barry wrote:
> One of my friends just installed Slackware and had the same problem. He used
> the
> 2.0.35 kernel but I'm pretty certain you'll be fine with the 2.0.34. I don't
> know what
Must have been a 2.0.35 pre-release, or an error;
fi
One of my friends just installed Slackware and had the same problem. He used the
2.0.35 kernel but I'm pretty certain you'll be fine with the 2.0.34. I don't
know what
kernel the latest bo comes with, but you might want to consider hamm, since
upgrading
from bo to hamm is a considerable pain but
3 matches
Mail list logo
