Dne, 05. 11. 2010 23:30:19 je Kamaraju S Kusumanchi napisal(a):
Klistvud wrote:
> Dne, 05. 11. 2010 15:10:44 je Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. napisal(a):
>
>> No. That's NOT what those who know and love Debian stable want.
The
>> lack of
>> upstream changes is one of the main reasons I use stable
Klistvud wrote:
> Dne, 05. 11. 2010 15:10:44 je Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. napisal(a):
>
>> No. That's NOT what those who know and love Debian stable want. The
>> lack of
>> upstream changes is one of the main reasons I use stable on servers.
>
> +1
> You can say that again.
>
+2
Seriously! I d
Dne, 05. 11. 2010 15:10:44 je Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. napisal(a):
No. That's NOT what those who know and love Debian stable want. The
lack of
upstream changes is one of the main reasons I use stable on servers.
+1
You can say that again.
--
Cheerio,
Klistvud
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 09:10:44 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Friday 05 November 2010 08:13:41 Camaleón wrote:
>> > Thirdly, the policy of no new upstream versions after release isn't
>> > changed for volatile. (It is changed for volatile-sloppy.)
>>
>> And that is what people wants to
On Friday 05 November 2010 08:13:41 Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 07:54:29 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > In , Camaleón wrote:
> >>On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 00:30:11 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> >>> There is a third choice, I guess: Ship firefox / thunderbird in
> >>> non-free
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 07:54:29 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> In , Camaleón wrote:
>>On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 00:30:11 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>>> There is a third choice, I guess: Ship firefox / thunderbird in
>>> non-free. Support for non-free is best-effort, which basically means
In , Camaleón wrote:
>On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 00:30:11 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> There is a third choice, I guess: Ship firefox / thunderbird in
>> non-free. Support for non-free is best-effort, which basically means
>> that if upstream is willing to fix it then the security team /
>> mai
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 09:04:46 +, Chris wrote:
>> How about "volatile"? :-?
>>
>> ClamAV packages are there for that precisely reason (they need to be
>> updated -security fixes- very often).
>>
> Why not simply grab the package from mozilla and install under /opt Sent
It lacks system integrat
Why not simply grab the package from mozilla and install under /opt
Sent from my BlackBerry®
-Original Message-
From: Camaleón
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 08:38:21
To:
Subject: Mozilla products in Debian (was: A question for the list:)
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 00:30:11 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith J
9 matches
Mail list logo
