Re: Module problems

1999-08-10 Thread Eric G . Miller
| > You forget to do a couple important steps if you're using modules. | > 1. After "make-kpkg -revision... kernel_image" do | > make-kpkg modules_image . | | Actually 'make-kpkg kernel-image' also compiles any modules you | configured. So it is not necessary to do this extra step. I never

Re: Module problems

1999-08-10 Thread Paul Miller
"Eric G . Miller" wrote: > > You forget to do a couple important steps if you're using modules. > 1. After "make-kpkg -revision... kernel_image" do > make-kpkg modules_image . Actually 'make-kpkg kernel-image' also compiles any modules you configured. So it is not necessary to do this ext

Re: Module problems

1999-08-10 Thread Eric G . Miller
You forget to do a couple important steps if you're using modules. 1. After "make-kpkg -revision... kernel_image" do make-kpkg modules_image . 2. Then either: a) mv /lib/modules/[kernel version] \ /lib/modules/[kernel version]-old or b) rm -rf /lib/modules/[kernel version] 3.

Re: Module problems!

1999-07-05 Thread David Wright
Quoting Ramakrishnan M ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > hello, > I had been reading the Linux Device Drivers,and tried running the > first program. > #define KERNEL > #include ... > ...init_module(...) > . That first line is wrong, but I guess you copied into the email wrongly. > when I do insmod

Re: Module problems!

1999-07-05 Thread Stephen Pitts
On Mon, Jul 05, 1999 at 09:06:23AM +0530, Ramakrishnan M wrote: > hello, > I had been reading the Linux Device Drivers,and tried running the > first program. > #define KERNEL > #include ... > ...init_module(...) > . > > when I do insmod prog.o it says the program has been compiled to run