Re: Immortal processes [was: mc not loading and not dying (sid)]

2006-01-22 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2006-01-08 19:41:34, schrieb Hal Vaughan: > What are options to use in NFS to avoid that? I've had problems before where I do not know, because since 03/1999 (since I use Linux) I have never had a lock. I export with: __( '/etc/exports' )__

Re: Immortal processes [was: mc not loading and not dying (sid)]

2006-01-09 Thread Jan C. Nordholz
>> [processes in kernel I/O] > > What are options to use in NFS to avoid that? I've had problems before where > I had to reboot the NFS server and NFS on the clients would not let me kill > it or remount the shares. I'd have to reboot the client to be able to > remount the shares. (And reboo

Re: Immortal processes [was: mc not loading and not dying (sid)]

2006-01-08 Thread Hal Vaughan
On Sunday 08 January 2006 07:19 pm, Jan C. Nordholz wrote: > On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 04:06:01PM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 15:32:11 +0200 > > > > Linas Zvirblis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > By the way, there is no such thing as unkillable, "killall -9 > > > mc"

Re: Immortal processes [was: mc not loading and not dying (sid)]

2006-01-08 Thread Jan C. Nordholz
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 04:06:01PM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 15:32:11 +0200 > Linas Zvirblis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > By the way, there is no such thing as unkillable, "killall -9 > > mc" and "killall -9 acroread" should get rid of them. > > I have lately