On Du, 27 mai 12, 08:54:16, Slavko wrote:
[snip great explanation]
> When new stable version is released, it simple mean that:
>
> * the actual stable is renamed as oldstable
> * the actual testing is renamed to stable
> * the actual unstable is copied as new testing.
Actually the new testing
On Sat, 26 May 2012 21:26:09 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
> I still do not fully understand the debian system of versioning at its
> relationship to the install isos.
It's simple: the first released ISO (6.0.0) is being updated on a regular
basis (now 6.0.5) to add all the patches that came out af
Ahoj,
Dňa Sat, 26 May 2012 21:26:09 -0400 Harry Putnam
napísal:
> I still do not fully understand the debian system of versioning at its
> relationship to the install isos.
Debian has three main "versions" (more precise: the Debian's distribution
or branch):
* stable - released after cca 2 yea
On Sb, 26 mai 12, 21:26:09, Harry Putnam wrote:
> I still do not fully understand the debian system of versioning at its
> relationship to the install isos.
Can you provide some examples?
> If I wanted a new system that was the stable released version, which
> install iso would I use?
The lates
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 09:26:09PM -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
> I still do not fully understand the debian system of versioning at its
> relationship to the install isos.
>
> If I wanted a new system that was the stable released version, which
> install iso would I use?
Is the documentation at "h
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 09:26:09PM -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
> I still do not fully understand the debian system of versioning at its
> relationship to the install isos.
>
> If I wanted a new system that was the stable released version, which
> install iso would I use?
>
See this link: http://w
6 matches
Mail list logo
