On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 09:23:22AM +0600, V.Suresh wrote:
> Somedays back somebody in the list told me that woody is the unstable
> version, and it will soon be stable version. If so, then what is the
> testing version? And what is sid? I am a bit confused about these names.
> Is Sid testin
on Thu, May 10, 2001 at 03:55:41PM -0500, Michael Janssen (CS/MATH stud.)
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> In Karsten M. Self's email, 10-05-2001:
> > on Thu, May 10, 2001 at 11:19:32AM -0500, Nathan E Norman ([EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 11:04:23PM -0500, ktb wrote:
>
In Karsten M. Self's email, 10-05-2001:
> on Thu, May 10, 2001 at 11:19:32AM -0500, Nathan E Norman ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 11:04:23PM -0500, ktb wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 02:01:42PM +1000, Craig Holyoak wrote:
> > > > potato => stable
> > > > woody =>
on Thu, May 10, 2001 at 11:19:32AM -0500, Nathan E Norman ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 11:04:23PM -0500, ktb wrote:
> > On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 02:01:42PM +1000, Craig Holyoak wrote:
> > > potato => stable
> > > woody => testing
> > > sid=> unstable
> > >
> > > I beli
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 11:04:23PM -0500, ktb wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 02:01:42PM +1000, Craig Holyoak wrote:
> > potato => stable
> > woody => testing
> > sid=> unstable
> >
> > I believe woody will soon(?) become stable.
>
> When was a debian release ever "soon";)
> kent
In geolog
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 07:26:28AM -0500, ktb wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 02:47:11AM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > on Wed, May 09, 2001 at 11:04:23PM -0500, ktb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 02:01:42PM +1000, Craig Holyoak wrote:
> > > > potato => stable
> > > >
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 02:47:11AM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Wed, May 09, 2001 at 11:04:23PM -0500, ktb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 02:01:42PM +1000, Craig Holyoak wrote:
> > > potato => stable
> > > woody => testing
> > > sid=> unstable
> > >
> > > I belie
on Wed, May 09, 2001 at 11:04:23PM -0500, ktb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 02:01:42PM +1000, Craig Holyoak wrote:
> > potato => stable
> > woody => testing
> > sid=> unstable
> >
> > I believe woody will soon(?) become stable.
>
> When was a debian release ever "soon"
:) But that's 'sposed to be secret!
On Wednesday 09 May 2001 21:04, ktb wrote:
> > I believe woody will soon(?) become stable.
>
> When was a debian release ever "soon";)
> kent
--
Jaye Inabnit\ARS ke6sls/TELE: USA-707-442-6579\/A GNU-Debian linux user
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WEB: http://www.
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 02:01:42PM +1000, Craig Holyoak wrote:
> potato => stable
> woody => testing
> sid=> unstable
>
> I believe woody will soon(?) become stable.
When was a debian release ever "soon";)
kent
--
From seeing and seeing the seeing has become so exhausted
First line o
potato = stable (current)
woody = testing (will be the next stable)
sid = unstable (bleeding edge stuff)
tatah
On Wednesday 09 May 2001 20:23, V.Suresh wrote:
> Somedays back somebody in the list told me that woody is the unstable
> version, and it will soon be stable version. If so, then wha
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 09:23:22AM +0600, V.Suresh wrote:
> Somedays back somebody in the list told me that woody is the unstable
> version, and it will soon be stable version. If so, then what is the
> testing version? And what is sid? I am a bit confused about these names.
> Is Sid testin
potato => stable
woody => testing
sid=> unstable
I believe woody will soon(?) become stable.
Craig
On Thu, 10 May 2001, V.Suresh wrote:
> Somedays back somebody in the list told me that woody is the unstable
> version, and it will soon be stable version. If so, then what is the
> tes
13 matches
Mail list logo