Re: Haunted PPP daemon.....

1998-11-03 Thread john
Ryan Kirkpatrick writes: > As for the authentication protocal, I understand now. The ISP was > demanding an auth protocol and I was demanding one as well. Guess it does > not work even when both demand the same auth protocal... Actually, it would work fine as long as both sides are willing to auth

Re: Haunted PPP daemon.....

1998-11-03 Thread Ryan Kirkpatrick
On 1 Nov 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Ryan Kirkpatrick writes: > > They never specified what authentication protocal to be used (chap or > > pap), while I was. > > You need to understand that ppp is a peer to peer protocol. There is no > server and no client: it works exactly the same way whe

Re: Haunted PPP daemon.....

1998-11-02 Thread john
Ryan Kirkpatrick writes: > They never specified what authentication protocal to be used (chap or > pap), while I was. You need to understand that ppp is a peer to peer protocol. There is no server and no client: it works exactly the same way whether you are a user dialing in or an ISP. When you

Re: Haunted PPP daemon.....

1998-11-02 Thread Martin Bialasinski
>> "RK" == Ryan Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: RK> lcp debug messages I think I figured it out. DO NOT specify the RK> authentication method to use. Simply set in ppp options the username that If you used "+pap" or "require-pap", then you demended the other side to authenticate itself w

Re: Haunted PPP daemon.....

1998-11-01 Thread Ryan Kirkpatrick
On Sun, 1 Nov 1998, Klaus Lepschi wrote: > As far as I know there is a little bug in the example scripts > for insofar it does not mention a necessaray > parameter that is needed when is called. To connect you > to your service provider needs to know your . > This can be set via an entry in ("