On Tue, Mar 09, 1999 at 02:55:43PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
>
> No, banning is the way to get control of an otherwise unwieldy
> situation. Have you been on a channel that gets 10-20 clone/flood attacks
> per week? You can that a social problem but tell me, exactly how would
> *YOU* solve it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 9 Mar 1999 23:24:21 +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>Yeah, why should we try to improve our social life when a simple ban command
>makes us feel powerful.
>Banning and ignoring is the simplest way to deal with social problems.
No, banning
On Tue, Mar 09, 1999 at 02:06:18PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
>
> >The ability of some IRCers to blatantly ban entire countries because of the
> >acts of a few is why EfNet is in a decline. Too many little kids fighting
> >for "power" in a virtual medium. It's funny in a sad sort of way.
>
>
3 matches
Mail list logo
