On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 04:12:35PM +, Daniel Goldsmith wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 15:44:40 +, David Dorward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Daniel Goldsmith wrote:
>
[...]
> > > o Why were the dos/win filesystem supports removed from Sarge's
> > > kernels?
> >
> > They aren't, as far as
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 15:44:40 +, David Dorward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Goldsmith wrote:
> FAT32 is called vfat all though Linux world.
>
> mount -t vfat /dev/hdb1 /mnt/windows
I'm not being deliberately obtuse here, but I tried that and I got a
'not supported' message
> > o Why
Daniel Goldsmith wrote:
o Which module needs to be loaded? I have loaded msdos and vfat, but
the system still says that the fat32 is not supported by the kernel.
FAT32 is called vfat all though Linux world.
mount -t vfat /dev/hdb1 /mnt/windows
o Why were the dos/win filesystem supports removed from
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 01:22:29PM +, Daniel Goldsmith wrote:
> the Debian system refuses to mount the Windows FAT32 partition, although it
> does recognise it.
you need to load the "vfat" module:
modprobe vfat
I was a bit annoyed with Ubuntu, I would expect them to load the "vfat" module
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 13:22:29 +, Daniel Goldsmith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for re-awakening this fairly dead thread, but...
>
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 13:30:25 +0200, David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > There are, as posted, other alternatives as well. Ext3 is simplest, I think
Sorry for re-awakening this fairly dead thread, but...
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 13:30:25 +0200, David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are, as posted, other alternatives as well. Ext3 is simplest, I think.
> Linux can mount NTFS read-only but has full FAT32 support.
Is that the case with a de
6 matches
Mail list logo
