Ben Bettin wrote:
I'm running Sarge and have two 250 gb drives. One has my system
installed on it, the other is mounted as /backup. I intended to use
/backup to...well...back things up :)
How do I grant certain users access to /backup? Right now it's only
accessible to the root user. I've read
Ben Bettin wrote:
I'm running Sarge and have two 250 gb drives. One has my system
installed on it, the other is mounted as /backup. I intended to use
/backup to...well...back things up :)
How do I grant certain users access to /backup? Right now it's only
accessible to the root user. I've read
Hello
Ben Bettin (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I'm running Sarge and have two 250 gb drives. One has my system
> installed on it, the other is mounted as /backup. I intended to use
> /backup to...well...back things up :)
>
> How do I grant certain users access to /backup? Right now it's only
also sprach Haralambos Geortgilakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.11.19.1022 +0100]:
> haralambos@haralambos:~$ ld -ld / /Hellene
ls I meant sorry..
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things
Yo Madduck,
luv that handle! Donald Duck is one of my favz @ Disney!
Now, where was I? Debian Tux
haralambos@haralambos:~$ ld -ld / /Hellene
ld: cannot find -ld
haralambos@haralambos:~$ su
Password:
haralambos:/home/haralambos# ld -ld / /Hellene
ld: cannot find -ld
haralambos:/home/harala
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 12:51:05PM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> that brings up a question i've been wondering: is the FHS merely a
> guideline that debian packages follow, or is it something that debian
> users are also strongly recommended to follow as well?
Debian users can do what they like, al
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 12:51:05PM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> that brings up a question i've been wondering: is the FHS merely a
> guideline that debian packages follow, or is it something that debian
> users are also strongly recommended to follow as well? granted i might
> be a hypocrite for n
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 04:51:15PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> /windows? that's a direct violation of the FHS. just being picky as
> you were.
does it? i didn't think it did since the reason listed in the fhs for
not putting more stuff in / is to keep it small and thus less likely
to corrupt
> of time, i'd put it somewhere like /windows or /usr/local/win or
> something.
/windows? that's a direct violation of the FHS. just being picky as
you were.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have
hiya,
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 12:41:42PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>/dev/hda1 /mnt/win1 vfatdefaults,ro,user,noauto 0 0
not to be picky, but just to point it out, having sub-directories in
/mnt is non-standard (well, to most linuces/unices, redhat seems to
have oth
also sprach Haralambos Geortgilakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.11.18.1219 +0100]:
>
> haralambos:/Hellene# cd Stuff
> haralambos:/Hellene/Stuff# ls -ld
> drwxr-xr-x 38 root root24576 Aug 12 21:09 .
> haralambos:/Hellene/Stuff#
>
so /Hellene is a VFAT partition? can you give me
*
Hi Yall & Martin,
here is a wee screen dump
haralambos:/Hellene# cd Stuff
haralambos:/Hellene/Stuff# ls -ld
drwxr-xr-x 38 root root24576 Aug 12 21:09 .
haralambos:/Hellene/Stuff#
Must crash-it is late on this side of the planet. :-)
*BFN*
H :-)
Seen in a watch shop: PL
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 11:10:36PM +1300, Haralambos Geortgilakis wrote:
>
> So, I have a directory, on a Win-FAT-32 partition, with various
> sub-directories & I wanna access then as a plain user.
>
> Um, like what is the syntax dude/dudette?
Hello
I would first make some changes to /etc/fst
also sprach Haralambos Geortgilakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.11.18.1110 +0100]:
> So, I have a directory, on a Win-FAT-32 partition, with various
> sub-directories & I wanna access then as a plain user.
show me the `ls -ld ` on that directory.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rick Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The reason I opted for mc in the first place was for the ability to tag or
> untag directories to avoid copying /proc and the /mnt directories. Since
> it had the option to retain UID's and GID's I thought it was a safe
> option. I backfired on me which I
The reason I opted for mc in the first place was for the ability to tag or
untag directories to avoid copying /proc and the /mnt directories. Since
it had the option to retain UID's and GID's I thought it was a safe
option. I backfired on me which I think is a bug and will report it as
such.
I
On Tue, 29 Apr 1997 Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-snip--
> Using the correct tools is important. David gives you one such tool - I
> personally type the following command in the directory I wish to copy:
> "find . -prin
On 13:28:43 Nathan E Norman wrote:
>
>Using the correct tools is important. David gives you one such tool - I
>personally type the following command in the directory I wish to copy:
>"find . -print | cpio -p /target". This is of course a simplification;
>find and cpio have a lot of powerful opti
On Apr 29, Nathan E Norman wrote
>
> On Tue, 29 Apr 1997, David Wright wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 29 Apr 1997, Rick Jones wrote:
> >
> > > [ description of problem ]
> > >
> > > I did this to avoid a full install when I repartitioned since I have no
> > > backup system and have installed from ftp. S
Rick Jones wrote:
> 1. Is there an easy way to reset the permissions of my directories to
> what they should be? Such as a program that I can exicute that will set
> them or go through and prompt me for the changes.
I'd suggest using the dpkgcert package by Klee Dienes - it scans
all of the fi
On Tue, 29 Apr 1997, David Wright wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 1997, Rick Jones wrote:
>
> > [ description of problem ]
> >
> > I did this to avoid a full install when I repartitioned since I have no
> > backup system and have installed from ftp. Somebody out there must have a
> > good way to reset
On Tue, 29 Apr 1997, Rick Jones wrote:
> As some of you are aware, I recently transfered my file system from hda1
> to hda2. When I did it I used midnight commander.
>
> MC has an option to keep UID's and GID's when copying. Supprise! It only
> does this on the files. When it created the direc
22 matches
Mail list logo