On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 08:34:47PM +1100, Steve Kieu wrote:
>
> >
> > apt-get install libgpcl0
>
> Ok, I re-download the file, install libgpcl0 and
> I had no luck, nothing changed.
> Is it possible that the file I downloaded is
> corrupted? But run tar -xf is fine
FWIW, I just successfully in
> > hour downloads for me
> > (56k modem). I've discussed the issue with Brian
>
> apt-get install libgpcl0
Ok, I re-download the file, install libgpcl0 and
I had no luck, nothing changed.
Is it possible that the file I downloaded is
corrupted? But run tar -xf is fine
>
=
S.KIEU
http
> the people, then blame the OpenOffice.org!
I admit that I was a bit impatient :-)
I just delete the file and read the email containing
the solution :-). Ok I am going to do it again
> Yes OO is not documented as it has to be, but there
Sure it should be documented.
> are some nice tips on the
on Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 03:46:42AM -0800, Karsten M. Self
(kmself@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
> on Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 01:00:57PM +1100, Steve Kieu ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I can not install Openoffice build 641b , when I
> > extract the big file and run setup, it only says:
> libs the setup program uses.
>
> ldd setup
>
> then make sure you have them all installed in the
> right places, if not, find the packages they are
> bundled in and install. The setup should complete
> now.
My god, I have run ldd setup in the install dir before
deleting all, all libraries
--- Steve Kieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I don't know a solution, I can only confirm the
> > bug.
> > >
> > > OpenOffice is particularly poor at documenting
> > known
> > > issues with
> > > particular builds. Discouraging as these are 10
> > > hour downloads for me
> > > (56k modem). I'
> > I don't know a solution, I can only confirm the
> bug.
> >
> > OpenOffice is particularly poor at documenting
> known
> > issues with
> > particular builds. Discouraging as these are 10
> > hour downloads for me
> > (56k modem). I've discussed the issue with Brian
> > Behlendorf in the
Yes
--- "Karsten M. Self" wrote:
> on Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 01:00:57PM +1100, Steve Kieu
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I can not install Openoffice build 641b , when I
> > extract the big file and run setup, it only says:
> >
> > glibc 2.2.4
> > then exit
> >
> > Is there any w
on Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 01:00:57PM +1100, Steve Kieu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I can not install Openoffice build 641b , when I
> extract the big file and run setup, it only says:
>
> glibc 2.2.4
> then exit
>
> Is there any way to work around this bug?
Note it's similar to OO bu
on Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 01:00:57PM +1100, Steve Kieu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I can not install Openoffice build 641b , when I
> extract the big file and run setup, it only says:
>
> glibc 2.2.4
> then exit
>
> Is there any way to work around this bug?
I don't know a solution, I
It might be incompatible glibc ? I have to forget this
beast though, the setup is not script, it is ELF file,
not any informative message given, any way I delete
this big-stupid-useless file already.. :-)
There has been reports about glibc 2.2.4 and
openoffice but I found no answer for that yet,
>
> Hi,
>
> I can not install Openoffice build 641b , when I
> extract the big file and run setup, it only says:
>
> glibc 2.2.4
> then exit
>
> Is there any way to work around this bug?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> =
> S.KIEU
>
You might try searching in the debian-openoffice mailing list ar
12 matches
Mail list logo
